H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Nikolay Davydenko vs Jo-Wilfried Tsonga H2H: 2-6

Jo-Wilfried Tsonga holds a 6–2 lead over Nikolay Davydenko in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Jo-Wilfried Tsonga leads 5–2 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jo-Wilfried Tsonga won the 2014 Dubai fourth round W/O.

RUS Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2 6
8 main draw meetings
FRA Age 41 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 27, 2014* Dubai ATP 500 R16 Hard Jo-Wilfried Tsonga #10 (w/o) Nikolay Davydenko #63 Match data
Feb 21, 2014* Marseille ATP 250 R16 Hard Jo-Wilfried Tsonga #10 7-6(4) 7-6(8) Nikolay Davydenko #63 Match data
Apr 17, 2013* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Jo-Wilfried Tsonga #8 7-6(3) 6-2 Nikolay Davydenko #41 Match data
Feb 22, 2013* Marseille ATP 250 R16 Hard Jo-Wilfried Tsonga #8 7-6(1) 6-3 Nikolay Davydenko #43 Match data
Oct 5, 2012* Beijing ATP 500 R16 Hard Jo-Wilfried Tsonga #7 (w/o) Nikolay Davydenko #43 Match data
Sep 22, 2012* Metz ATP 250 SF Hard Jo-Wilfried Tsonga #7 6-0 3-6 6-4 Nikolay Davydenko #48 Match data
Nov 9, 2008 Masters Cup ATP Finals RR Hard Nikolay Davydenko #5 6-7(6) 6-4 7-6(0) Jo-Wilfried Tsonga #7 Match data
Oct 11, 2007* Moscow ATP 250 R32 Hard Nikolay Davydenko #4 7-6(0) 6-2 Jo-Wilfried Tsonga #53 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nikolay Davydenko #248 #3 5,335 2,213 467 324 59.0% 0 3 1 1 16 21
Jo-Wilfried Tsonga #296 #5 5,230 2,208 445 228 66.1% 0 2 0 3 13 18

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nikolay Davydenko Jo-Wilfried Tsonga
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 2000 3–1 75.0% #133 1,544 0 0 2004 2–2 50.0% #163 1,549 0 0
20 2001 6–15 28.6% #79 1,568 0 0 2005 0–1 0.0% #338 1,547 0 0
21 2002 12–24 33.3% #81 1,601 0 0
22 2003 29–30 49.2% #44 1,595 0 2 2007 14–10 58.3% #43 1,768 0 0
23 2004 32–28 53.3% #28 1,758 0 4 2008 33–15 68.8% #6 1,994 0 2
24 2005 52–29 64.2% #5 1,868 0 5 2009 48–20 70.6% #10 1,976 0 5
25 2006 67–28 70.5% #3 1,971 0 10 2010 30–15 66.7% #13 1,974 0 5
26 2007 53–30 63.9% #4 1,935 0 11 2011 56–23 70.9% #6 2,161 0 7
27 2008 51–20 71.8% #5 1,974 0 14 2012 51–23 68.9% #8 2,054 0 9
28 2009 57–19 75.0% #6 2,142 0 19 2013 36–16 69.2% #10 2,051 0 10
29 2010 29–19 60.4% #22 1,897 0 20 2014 34–17 66.7% #12 2,070 0 11
30 2011 26–25 51.0% #41 1,848 0 21 2015 32–15 68.1% #10 2,089 0 12
31 2012 23–24 48.9% #44 1,824 0 21 2016 34–15 69.4% #12 2,141 0 12
32 2013 22–22 50.0% #53 1,824 0 21 2017 35–15 70.0% #15 2,007 0 16
33 2014 5–10 33.3% #250 1,730 0 21 2018 5–6 45.5% #239 1,922 0 16
34 2019 32–18 64.0% #29 1,970 0 18
35 2020 0–2 0.0% #62 1,910 0 18
36 2021 1–8 11.1% #263 1,740 0 18
37 2022 2–7 22.2% #296 1,686 0 18