H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:16 UTC

Nikolay Davydenko vs Juan Ignacio Chela H2H: 1-6

Juan Ignacio Chela holds a 6–1 lead over Nikolay Davydenko in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Juan Ignacio Chela leads 4–0 on clay and 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Nikolay Davydenko won the 2010 Valencia fourth round 7-6(0) 6-2.

RUS Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 6
7 main draw meetings
ARG Age 46 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Nov 4, 2010* Valencia ATP 250 R16 Hard Nikolay Davydenko #11 7-6(0) 6-2 Juan Ignacio Chela #40 Match data
Jul 31, 2010* Umag ATP 250 QF Clay Juan Ignacio Chela #56 6-2 6-1 Nikolay Davydenko #6 Match data
Aug 16, 2006* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Juan Ignacio Chela #35 6-4 2-6 6-2 Nikolay Davydenko #6 Match data
Aug 25, 2005* New Haven ATP 250 R32 Hard Juan Ignacio Chela #50 6-1 7-6(5) Nikolay Davydenko #6 Match data
Jul 26, 2002* Kitzbuhel ATP 250 R16 Clay Juan Ignacio Chela #25 6-0 6-1 Nikolay Davydenko #93 Match data
May 8, 2002* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Juan Ignacio Chela #26 6-1 2-6 6-1 Nikolay Davydenko #82 Match data
Jul 20, 2001* Amsterdam ATP 250 R16 Clay Juan Ignacio Chela #826 6-2 6-4 Nikolay Davydenko #91 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nikolay Davydenko #248 #3 5,335 2,213 467 324 59.0% 0 3 1 1 16 21
Juan Ignacio Chela #967 #15 1,510 1,909 306 268 53.3% 0 0 0 1 5 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nikolay Davydenko Juan Ignacio Chela
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 2000 3–1 75.0% #133 1,544 0 0 1999 0–3 0.0% #124 1,463 0 0
20 2001 6–15 28.6% #79 1,568 0 0 2000 13–15 46.4% #63 1,540 0 1
21 2002 12–24 33.3% #81 1,601 0 0 2001 10–10 50.0% #70 1,594 0 1
22 2003 29–30 49.2% #44 1,595 0 2 2002 44–27 62.0% #23 1,783 0 2
23 2004 32–28 53.3% #28 1,758 0 4 2003 35–27 56.5% #38 1,762 0 2
24 2005 52–29 64.2% #5 1,868 0 5 2004 33–25 56.9% #26 1,735 0 3
25 2006 67–28 70.5% #3 1,971 0 10 2005 28–26 51.9% #39 1,691 0 3
26 2007 53–30 63.9% #4 1,935 0 11 2006 27–26 50.9% #33 1,721 0 3
27 2008 51–20 71.8% #5 1,974 0 14 2007 39–23 62.9% #20 1,796 0 4
28 2009 57–19 75.0% #6 2,142 0 19 2008 11–12 47.8% #140 1,737 0 4
29 2010 29–19 60.4% #22 1,897 0 20 2009 9–14 39.1% #73 1,731 0 4
30 2011 26–25 51.0% #41 1,848 0 21 2010 28–24 53.8% #38 1,835 0 6
31 2012 23–24 48.9% #44 1,824 0 21 2011 24–24 50.0% #29 1,737 0 6
32 2013 22–22 50.0% #53 1,824 0 21 2012 5–12 29.4% #176 1,634 0 6
33 2014 5–10 33.3% #250 1,730 0 21