H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Nikolay Davydenko vs Juan Monaco H2H: 4-1

Nikolay Davydenko holds a 4–1 lead over Juan Monaco in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Nikolay Davydenko leads 2–1 on clay and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nikolay Davydenko won the 2010 Australian Open third round 6-0 6-3 6-4.

RUS Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
4 1
5 main draw meetings
ARG Age 42 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 24, 2010* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Nikolay Davydenko #6 6-0 6-3 6-4 Juan Monaco #33 Match data
Nov 6, 2009* Valencia ATP 250 R16 Hard Nikolay Davydenko #7 6-3 7-5 Juan Monaco #30 Match data
May 24, 2008* Poertschach ATP 250 F Clay Nikolay Davydenko #4 6-2 2-6 6-2 Juan Monaco #14 Match data
May 25, 2007* Poertschach ATP 250 QF Clay Juan Monaco #47 6-2 6-7(5) 6-4 Nikolay Davydenko #4 Match data
Aug 4, 2006* Sopot ATP 250 R16 Clay Nikolay Davydenko #6 7-5 6-7(7) 6-1 Juan Monaco #72 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nikolay Davydenko #248 #3 5,335 2,213 467 324 59.0% 0 3 1 1 16 21
Juan Monaco #226 #10 2,775 2,046 319 256 55.5% 0 0 0 1 7 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nikolay Davydenko Juan Monaco
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 2000 3–1 75.0% #133 1,544 0 0
20 2001 6–15 28.6% #79 1,568 0 0 2004 16–12 57.1% #73 1,661 0 0
21 2002 12–24 33.3% #81 1,601 0 0 2005 18–25 41.9% #85 1,587 0 0
22 2003 29–30 49.2% #44 1,595 0 2 2006 18–23 43.9% #69 1,641 0 0
23 2004 32–28 53.3% #28 1,758 0 4 2007 41–19 68.3% #23 1,864 0 3
24 2005 52–29 64.2% #5 1,868 0 5 2008 27–20 57.4% #46 1,768 0 3
25 2006 67–28 70.5% #3 1,971 0 10 2009 34–24 58.6% #30 1,850 0 3
26 2007 53–30 63.9% #4 1,935 0 11 2010 28–18 60.9% #26 1,838 0 3
27 2008 51–20 71.8% #5 1,974 0 14 2011 26–24 52.0% #26 1,932 0 3
28 2009 57–19 75.0% #6 2,142 0 19 2012 36–17 67.9% #12 1,944 0 7
29 2010 29–19 60.4% #22 1,897 0 20 2013 18–21 46.2% #42 1,809 0 7
30 2011 26–25 51.0% #41 1,848 0 21 2014 20–18 52.6% #62 1,856 0 7
31 2012 23–24 48.9% #44 1,824 0 21 2015 21–19 52.5% #53 1,811 0 7
32 2013 22–22 50.0% #53 1,824 0 21 2016 16–13 55.2% #65 1,864 0 8
33 2014 5–10 33.3% #250 1,730 0 21 2017 0–3 0.0% #226 1,805 0 8