H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Nikolay Davydenko vs Julien Benneteau H2H: 1-1
Nikolay Davydenko and Julien Benneteau are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Nikolay Davydenko won the 2014 Montpellier third round 7-6(6) 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 45
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 44
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 6, 2014* | Montpellier | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Nikolay Davydenko | 7-6(6) 7-5 | Julien Benneteau | Match data |
| Feb 13, 2009* | Rotterdam | ATP 500 | R16 | Hard | Julien Benneteau | 6-3 6-2 | Nikolay Davydenko | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nikolay Davydenko | #248 | #3 | 5,335 | 2,213 | 467 | 324 | 59.0% | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 16 | 21 |
| Julien Benneteau | #140 | #25 | 1,608 | 1,955 | 269 | 292 | 48.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nikolay Davydenko | Julien Benneteau | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2000 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #133 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #271 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2001 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #79 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #253 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2002 | 12–24 | 33.3% | #81 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #138 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2003 | 29–30 | 49.2% | #44 | 1,595 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #65 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2004 | 32–28 | 53.3% | #28 | 1,758 | 0 | 4 | 2005 | 5–18 | 21.7% | #165 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2005 | 52–29 | 64.2% | #5 | 1,868 | 0 | 5 | 2006 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #40 | 1,706 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2006 | 67–28 | 70.5% | #3 | 1,971 | 0 | 10 | 2007 | 22–28 | 44.0% | #68 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2007 | 53–30 | 63.9% | #4 | 1,935 | 0 | 11 | 2008 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #43 | 1,786 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2008 | 51–20 | 71.8% | #5 | 1,974 | 0 | 14 | 2009 | 26–28 | 48.1% | #46 | 1,793 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2009 | 57–19 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,142 | 0 | 19 | 2010 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #44 | 1,853 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2010 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #22 | 1,897 | 0 | 20 | 2011 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #52 | 1,871 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2011 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #41 | 1,848 | 0 | 21 | 2012 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #35 | 1,874 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2012 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #44 | 1,824 | 0 | 21 | 2013 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #35 | 1,861 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2013 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #53 | 1,824 | 0 | 21 | 2014 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #25 | 1,895 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2014 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #250 | 1,730 | 0 | 21 | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #527 | 1,801 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #130 | 1,807 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #56 | 1,862 | 0 | 0 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #140 | 1,806 | 0 | 0 |