H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC

Nikolay Davydenko vs Lleyton Hewitt H2H: 0-4

Lleyton Hewitt holds a 4–0 lead over Nikolay Davydenko in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Lleyton Hewitt leads 3–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lleyton Hewitt won the 2007 Hamburg Masters fourth round 6-4 2-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nikolay Davydenko
RUS Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 – 4
4 main draw meetings
Lleyton Hewitt
AUS Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 18, 2007* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 R16 Clay Lleyton Hewitt #21 6-4 2-6 6-4 Nikolay Davydenko #3 Match data
Aug 21, 2005* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 QF Hard Lleyton Hewitt #3 6-2 6-3 Nikolay Davydenko #7 Match data
May 30, 2003* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Lleyton Hewitt #1 6-3 4-6 6-3 7-6(5) Nikolay Davydenko #33 Match data
Jun 1, 2001* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Lleyton Hewitt #6 6-0 6-1 6-3 Nikolay Davydenko #116 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nikolay Davydenko #248 #3 5,335 2,213 467 324 59.0% 0 3 1 1 16 21
Lleyton Hewitt #636 #1 5,205 2,159 564 241 70.1% 2 2 2 1 23 30

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nikolay Davydenko Lleyton Hewitt
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1997 0–1 0.0% #550 1,492 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1998 10–9 52.6% #100 1,614 0 1
18 — — — — — — — 1999 40–18 69.0% #25 1,853 0 2
19 2000 3–1 75.0% #133 1,544 0 0 2000 53–15 77.9% #7 1,993 0 6
20 2001 6–15 28.6% #79 1,568 0 0 2001 71–15 82.6% #1 2,116 1 12
21 2002 12–24 33.3% #81 1,601 0 0 2002 61–16 79.2% #1 2,062 2 17
22 2003 29–30 49.2% #44 1,595 0 2 2003 29–10 74.4% #17 1,939 2 19
23 2004 32–28 53.3% #28 1,758 0 4 2004 64–16 80.0% #3 2,076 2 23
24 2005 52–29 64.2% #5 1,868 0 5 2005 36–9 80.0% #4 2,092 2 24
25 2006 67–28 70.5% #3 1,971 0 10 2006 32–14 69.6% #20 1,964 2 25
26 2007 53–30 63.9% #4 1,935 0 11 2007 34–15 69.4% #21 1,925 2 26
27 2008 51–20 71.8% #5 1,974 0 14 2008 17–10 63.0% #67 1,936 2 26
28 2009 57–19 75.0% #6 2,142 0 19 2009 33–19 63.5% #22 1,956 2 27
29 2010 29–19 60.4% #22 1,897 0 20 2010 18–11 62.1% #54 1,907 2 28
30 2011 26–25 51.0% #41 1,848 0 21 2011 8–9 47.1% #186 1,817 2 28
31 2012 23–24 48.9% #44 1,824 0 21 2012 13–11 54.2% #83 1,867 2 28
32 2013 22–22 50.0% #53 1,824 0 21 2013 22–18 55.0% #60 1,884 2 28
33 2014 5–10 33.3% #250 1,730 0 21 2014 19–15 55.9% #50 1,841 2 30
34 — — — — — — — 2015 3–9 25.0% #307 1,715 2 30
35 — — — — — — — 2016 1–1 50.0% #633 1,727 2 30