H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Nikolay Davydenko vs Marcos Baghdatis H2H: 2-2

Nikolay Davydenko and Marcos Baghdatis are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Nikolay Davydenko leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Marcos Baghdatis leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Nikolay Davydenko won the 2010 Rotterdam fourth round 6-3 6-2.

RUS Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2 2
4 main draw meetings
CYP Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 12, 2010* Rotterdam ATP 500 R16 Hard Nikolay Davydenko #6 6-3 6-2 Marcos Baghdatis #36 Match data
Nov 2, 2007* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Marcos Baghdatis #22 6-2 6-2 Nikolay Davydenko #4 Match data
Jul 3, 2007* Wimbledon Grand Slam R16 Grass Marcos Baghdatis #16 7-6(5) 7-6(5) 6-3 Nikolay Davydenko #4 Match data
Mar 23, 2006* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Nikolay Davydenko #5 2-6 6-2 7-5 Marcos Baghdatis #26 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nikolay Davydenko #248 #3 5,335 2,213 467 324 59.0% 0 3 1 1 16 21
Marcos Baghdatis #179 #8 2,111 1,952 324 272 54.4% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nikolay Davydenko Marcos Baghdatis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 2000 3–1 75.0% #133 1,544 0 0 2004 1–1 50.0% #159 1,559 0 0
20 2001 6–15 28.6% #79 1,568 0 0 2005 11–12 47.8% #55 1,694 0 0
21 2002 12–24 33.3% #81 1,601 0 0 2006 33–20 62.3% #12 1,842 0 1
22 2003 29–30 49.2% #44 1,595 0 2 2007 44–22 66.7% #16 1,937 0 2
23 2004 32–28 53.3% #28 1,758 0 4 2008 12–12 50.0% #98 1,815 0 2
24 2005 52–29 64.2% #5 1,868 0 5 2009 18–16 52.9% #42 1,810 0 3
25 2006 67–28 70.5% #3 1,971 0 10 2010 41–27 60.3% #20 1,852 0 4
26 2007 53–30 63.9% #4 1,935 0 11 2011 26–27 49.1% #44 1,844 0 4
27 2008 51–20 71.8% #5 1,974 0 14 2012 31–24 56.4% #36 1,897 0 4
28 2009 57–19 75.0% #6 2,142 0 19 2013 14–22 38.9% #87 1,804 0 4
29 2010 29–19 60.4% #22 1,897 0 20 2014 7–11 38.9% #85 1,703 0 4
30 2011 26–25 51.0% #41 1,848 0 21 2015 26–19 57.8% #46 1,869 0 4
31 2012 23–24 48.9% #44 1,824 0 21 2016 26–23 53.1% #36 1,884 0 4
32 2013 22–22 50.0% #53 1,824 0 21 2017 18–16 52.9% #102 1,839 0 4
33 2014 5–10 33.3% #250 1,730 0 21 2018 12–17 41.4% #124 1,723 0 4
34 2019 4–3 57.1% #179 1,740 0 4