H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Nikolay Davydenko vs Michael Llodra H2H: 4-3

Nikolay Davydenko holds a 4–3 lead over Michael Llodra in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Michael Llodra leads 3–2 on hard courts, while Nikolay Davydenko leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Michael Llodra won the 2011 Rotterdam third round 6-3 7-6(4).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nikolay Davydenko
RUS Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
4 – 3
7 main draw meetings
Michael Llodra
FRA Age 46 Left-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 10, 2011* Rotterdam ATP 500 R32 Hard Michael Llodra #22 6-3 7-6(4) Nikolay Davydenko #34 Match data
Nov 13, 2010* Paris Masters Masters 1000 QF Hard Michael Llodra #34 7-5 6-1 Nikolay Davydenko #11 Match data
Feb 22, 2008* Rotterdam ATP 500 R16 Hard Michael Llodra #58 6-3 7-5 Nikolay Davydenko #4 Match data
Jan 16, 2008* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Nikolay Davydenko #4 7-5 7-5 6-3 Michael Llodra #50 Match data
Jun 3, 2007* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Nikolay Davydenko #4 6-4 6-2 6-4 Michael Llodra #87 Match data
Oct 7, 2005* Metz ATP 250 R16 Hard Nikolay Davydenko #7 6-4 6-4 Michael Llodra #111 Match data
May 11, 2005* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Nikolay Davydenko #20 6-1 6-1 Michael Llodra #51 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nikolay Davydenko #248 #3 5,335 2,213 467 324 59.0% 0 3 1 1 16 21
Michael Llodra #631 #21 1,575 1,901 182 215 45.8% 0 0 0 1 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nikolay Davydenko Michael Llodra
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 2000 3–1 75.0% #133 1,544 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2001 6–15 28.6% #79 1,568 0 0 2000 5–7 41.7% #159 1,598 0 0
21 2002 12–24 33.3% #81 1,601 0 0 2001 6–11 35.3% #89 1,602 0 0
22 2003 29–30 49.2% #44 1,595 0 2 2002 12–17 41.4% #104 1,620 0 0
23 2004 32–28 53.3% #28 1,758 0 4 2003 2–10 16.7% #173 1,590 0 0
24 2005 52–29 64.2% #5 1,868 0 5 2004 20–12 62.5% #41 1,734 0 1
25 2006 67–28 70.5% #3 1,971 0 10 2005 10–20 33.3% #136 1,625 0 1
26 2007 53–30 63.9% #4 1,935 0 11 2006 4–8 33.3% #96 1,608 0 1
27 2008 51–20 71.8% #5 1,974 0 14 2007 13–18 41.9% #93 1,640 0 1
28 2009 57–19 75.0% #6 2,142 0 19 2008 21–19 52.5% #40 1,725 0 3
29 2010 29–19 60.4% #22 1,897 0 20 2009 17–16 51.5% #67 1,738 0 3
30 2011 26–25 51.0% #41 1,848 0 21 2010 27–21 56.2% #23 1,879 0 5
31 2012 23–24 48.9% #44 1,824 0 21 2011 17–21 44.7% #47 1,776 0 5
32 2013 22–22 50.0% #53 1,824 0 21 2012 12–14 46.2% #53 1,842 0 5
33 2014 5–10 33.3% #250 1,730 0 21 2013 12–15 44.4% #105 1,787 0 5
34 — — — — — — — 2014 4–6 40.0% #269 1,688 0 5