H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Nikolay Davydenko vs Mikhail Youzhny H2H: 4-2

Nikolay Davydenko holds a 4–2 lead over Mikhail Youzhny in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Nikolay Davydenko leads 3–2 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Nikolay Davydenko won the 2013 Doha fourth round 7-5 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nikolay Davydenko
RUS Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
4 – 2
6 main draw meetings
Mikhail Youzhny
RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 3, 2013* Doha ATP 250 R16 Hard Nikolay Davydenko #44 7-5 6-3 Mikhail Youzhny #25 Match data
Nov 7, 2009* Valencia ATP 250 SF Hard Mikhail Youzhny #23 3-6 6-4 6-3 Nikolay Davydenko #7 Match data
Jan 22, 2008* Australian Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Mikhail Youzhny #14 7-6(2) 6-3 6-1 Nikolay Davydenko #4 Match data
Aug 10, 2007* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Nikolay Davydenko #5 7-6(8) 6-3 Mikhail Youzhny #13 Match data
Oct 16, 2004* Moscow ATP 250 SF Carpet Nikolay Davydenko #43 7-5 6-7(5) 7-5 Mikhail Youzhny #33 Match data
Jan 3, 2002* Doha ATP 250 R32 Hard Nikolay Davydenko #79 6-4 6-2 Mikhail Youzhny #58 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nikolay Davydenko #248 #3 5,335 2,213 467 324 59.0% 0 3 1 1 16 21
Mikhail Youzhny #115 #8 3,500 2,069 477 405 54.1% 0 0 0 1 9 10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nikolay Davydenko Mikhail Youzhny
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1999 0–1 0.0% #286 1,493 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2000 5–8 38.5% #113 1,531 0 0
19 2000 3–1 75.0% #133 1,544 0 0 2001 20–18 52.6% #58 1,694 0 0
20 2001 6–15 28.6% #79 1,568 0 0 2002 30–22 57.7% #32 1,866 0 1
21 2002 12–24 33.3% #81 1,601 0 0 2003 28–26 51.9% #43 1,746 0 1
22 2003 29–30 49.2% #44 1,595 0 2 2004 38–25 60.3% #16 1,870 0 2
23 2004 32–28 53.3% #28 1,758 0 4 2005 23–21 52.3% #43 1,758 0 2
24 2005 52–29 64.2% #5 1,868 0 5 2006 23–22 51.1% #24 1,803 0 2
25 2006 67–28 70.5% #3 1,971 0 10 2007 48–24 66.7% #19 1,880 0 3
26 2007 53–30 63.9% #4 1,935 0 11 2008 24–19 55.8% #32 1,761 0 4
27 2008 51–20 71.8% #5 1,974 0 14 2009 41–27 60.3% #19 1,960 0 5
28 2009 57–19 75.0% #6 2,142 0 19 2010 40–19 67.8% #10 1,936 0 7
29 2010 29–19 60.4% #22 1,897 0 20 2011 24–22 52.2% #35 1,837 0 7
30 2011 26–25 51.0% #41 1,848 0 21 2012 33–21 61.1% #25 1,902 0 8
31 2012 23–24 48.9% #44 1,824 0 21 2013 39–24 61.9% #15 2,016 0 10
32 2013 22–22 50.0% #53 1,824 0 21 2014 18–24 42.9% #48 1,795 0 10
33 2014 5–10 33.3% #250 1,730 0 21 2015 9–24 27.3% #127 1,701 0 10
34 — — — — — — — 2016 17–20 45.9% #57 1,774 0 10
35 — — — — — — — 2017 10–20 33.3% #84 1,679 0 10
36 — — — — — — — 2018 7–18 28.0% #115 1,637 0 10