H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC

Nikolay Davydenko vs Nicolas Kiefer H2H: 1-3

Nicolas Kiefer holds a 3–1 lead over Nikolay Davydenko in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Nicolas Kiefer leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Nicolas Kiefer won the 2008 Canada Masters fourth round 4-6 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nikolay Davydenko
RUS Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 – 3
4 main draw meetings
Nicolas Kiefer
GER Age 49 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 25, 2008* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Nicolas Kiefer #37 4-6 6-4 6-4 Nikolay Davydenko #4 Match data
May 16, 2008* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 R16 Clay Nicolas Kiefer #41 7-5 6-3 Nikolay Davydenko #4 Match data
Aug 30, 2007* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Nikolay Davydenko #4 6-2 6-2 6-2 Nicolas Kiefer #187 Match data
Oct 29, 2005* St. Petersburg ATP 250 QF Carpet Nicolas Kiefer #29 6-1 6-1 Nikolay Davydenko #8 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nikolay Davydenko #248 #3 5,335 2,213 467 324 59.0% 0 3 1 1 16 21
Nicolas Kiefer #720 #4 2,447 1,984 343 252 57.6% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nikolay Davydenko Nicolas Kiefer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1994 0–1 0.0% #1198 1,489 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1995 3–3 50.0% #206 1,527 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1996 7–9 43.8% #128 1,562 0 0
19 2000 3–1 75.0% #133 1,544 0 0 1997 26–16 61.9% #32 1,798 0 1
20 2001 6–15 28.6% #79 1,568 0 0 1998 31–25 55.4% #35 1,790 0 1
21 2002 12–24 33.3% #81 1,601 0 0 1999 53–21 71.6% #6 1,921 0 4
22 2003 29–30 49.2% #44 1,595 0 2 2000 30–15 66.7% #20 1,921 0 6
23 2004 32–28 53.3% #28 1,758 0 4 2001 26–25 51.0% #42 1,766 0 6
24 2005 52–29 64.2% #5 1,868 0 5 2002 19–24 44.2% #72 1,718 0 6
25 2006 67–28 70.5% #3 1,971 0 10 2003 19–17 52.8% #58 1,727 0 6
26 2007 53–30 63.9% #4 1,935 0 11 2004 32–19 62.7% #21 1,897 0 6
27 2008 51–20 71.8% #5 1,974 0 14 2005 31–22 58.5% #22 1,854 0 6
28 2009 57–19 75.0% #6 2,142 0 19 2006 14–8 63.6% #48 1,843 0 6
29 2010 29–19 60.4% #22 1,897 0 20 2007 19–12 61.3% #49 1,893 0 6
30 2011 26–25 51.0% #41 1,848 0 21 2008 20–16 55.6% #38 1,876 0 6
31 2012 23–24 48.9% #44 1,824 0 21 2009 12–16 42.9% #116 1,757 0 6
32 2013 22–22 50.0% #53 1,824 0 21 2010 1–3 25.0% #722 1,717 0 6
33 2014 5–10 33.3% #250 1,730 0 21 — — — — — — —