H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Nikolay Davydenko vs Nicolas Lapentti H2H: 2-3

Nicolas Lapentti holds a 3–2 lead over Nikolay Davydenko in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Nicolas Lapentti leads 2–1 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Nikolay Davydenko won the 2007 Moscow fourth round 6-4 6-4.

RUS Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2 3
5 main draw meetings
ECU Age 49 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 12, 2007* Moscow ATP 250 R16 Hard Nikolay Davydenko #4 6-4 6-4 Nicolas Lapentti #113 Match data
May 24, 2007* Poertschach ATP 250 R16 Clay Nikolay Davydenko #4 6-4 6-2 Nicolas Lapentti #65 Match data
Jul 27, 2006* Kitzbuhel ATP 250 R32 Clay Nicolas Lapentti #116 6-3 6-3 Nikolay Davydenko #6 Match data
Jul 25, 2003* Kitzbuhel ATP 250 R16 Clay Nicolas Lapentti #64 6-3 6-3 Nikolay Davydenko #33 Match data
Mar 20, 2002* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Nicolas Lapentti #22 6-2 6-4 Nikolay Davydenko #86 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nikolay Davydenko #248 #3 5,335 2,213 467 324 59.0% 0 3 1 1 16 21
Nicolas Lapentti #885 #6 2,293 1,935 282 280 50.2% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nikolay Davydenko Nicolas Lapentti
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1995 5–0 100.0% #109 1,594 0 1
19 2000 3–1 75.0% #133 1,544 0 0 1996 11–19 36.7% #121 1,576 0 1
20 2001 6–15 28.6% #79 1,568 0 0 1997 17–18 48.6% #63 1,660 0 1
21 2002 12–24 33.3% #81 1,601 0 0 1998 16–29 35.6% #90 1,596 0 1
22 2003 29–30 49.2% #44 1,595 0 2 1999 52–24 68.4% #8 1,883 0 3
23 2004 32–28 53.3% #28 1,758 0 4 2000 40–28 58.8% #24 1,755 0 3
24 2005 52–29 64.2% #5 1,868 0 5 2001 30–22 57.7% #23 1,837 0 4
25 2006 67–28 70.5% #3 1,971 0 10 2002 32–27 54.2% #29 1,714 0 5
26 2007 53–30 63.9% #4 1,935 0 11 2003 20–22 47.6% #57 1,697 0 5
27 2008 51–20 71.8% #5 1,974 0 14 2004 7–14 33.3% #122 1,600 0 5
28 2009 57–19 75.0% #6 2,142 0 19 2005 9–16 36.0% #95 1,579 0 5
29 2010 29–19 60.4% #22 1,897 0 20 2006 12–9 57.1% #67 1,682 0 5
30 2011 26–25 51.0% #41 1,848 0 21 2007 10–14 41.7% #109 1,611 0 5
31 2012 23–24 48.9% #44 1,824 0 21 2008 14–17 45.2% #86 1,658 0 5
32 2013 22–22 50.0% #53 1,824 0 21 2009 6–14 30.0% #97 1,668 0 5
33 2014 5–10 33.3% #250 1,730 0 21 2010 1–7 12.5% #447 1,582 0 5