H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Nikolay Davydenko vs Nicolas Mahut H2H: 3-0

Nikolay Davydenko holds a 3–0 lead over Nicolas Mahut in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Nikolay Davydenko leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nikolay Davydenko won the 2011 Valencia fourth round W/O.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nikolay Davydenko
RUS Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main draw meetings
Nicolas Mahut
FRA Age 44 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Nov 4, 2011* Valencia ATP 250 R16 Hard Nikolay Davydenko #36 (w/o) Nicolas Mahut #103 Match data
Jan 17, 2008* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Nikolay Davydenko #4 6-4 6-0 6-3 Nicolas Mahut #44 Match data
Sep 1, 2006* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Nikolay Davydenko #6 6-0 (ret.) Nicolas Mahut #66 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nikolay Davydenko #248 #3 5,335 2,213 467 324 59.0% 0 3 1 1 16 21
Nicolas Mahut #1,433 #37 1,122 1,926 179 224 44.4% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nikolay Davydenko Nicolas Mahut
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 2000 0–2 0.0% #388 1,516 0 0
19 2000 3–1 75.0% #133 1,544 0 0 2001 1–4 20.0% #216 1,498 0 0
20 2001 6–15 28.6% #79 1,568 0 0 2002 0–1 0.0% #269 1,445 0 0
21 2002 12–24 33.3% #81 1,601 0 0 2003 3–6 33.3% #94 1,538 0 0
22 2003 29–30 49.2% #44 1,595 0 2 2004 3–10 23.1% #131 1,545 0 0
23 2004 32–28 53.3% #28 1,758 0 4 2005 1–5 16.7% #134 1,467 0 0
24 2005 52–29 64.2% #5 1,868 0 5 2006 11–19 36.7% #66 1,581 0 0
25 2006 67–28 70.5% #3 1,971 0 10 2007 22–20 52.4% #45 1,732 0 0
26 2007 53–30 63.9% #4 1,935 0 11 2008 16–26 38.1% #94 1,644 0 0
27 2008 51–20 71.8% #5 1,974 0 14 2009 4–4 50.0% #214 1,633 0 0
28 2009 57–19 75.0% #6 2,142 0 19 2010 3–7 30.0% #132 1,662 0 0
29 2010 29–19 60.4% #22 1,897 0 20 2011 11–12 47.8% #80 1,765 0 0
30 2011 26–25 51.0% #41 1,848 0 21 2012 16–18 47.1% #108 1,754 0 0
31 2012 23–24 48.9% #44 1,824 0 21 2013 17–7 70.8% #50 1,851 0 2
32 2013 22–22 50.0% #53 1,824 0 21 2014 14–23 37.8% #117 1,666 0 2
33 2014 5–10 33.3% #250 1,730 0 21 2015 11–10 52.4% #71 1,767 0 3
34 — — — — — — — 2016 23–20 53.5% #39 1,869 0 4
35 — — — — — — — 2017 14–19 42.4% #103 1,753 0 4
36 — — — — — — — 2018 5–8 38.5% #190 1,707 0 4
37 — — — — — — — 2019 4–3 57.1% #194 1,707 0 4