H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Nikolay Davydenko vs Radek Stepanek H2H: 5-4

Nikolay Davydenko holds a 5–4 lead over Radek Stepanek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while Nikolay Davydenko leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Nikolay Davydenko won the 2011 Munich semifinal 6-3 4-0 RET.

RUS Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
5 4
9 main draw meetings
CZE Age 47 Right-Handed 186 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 30, 2011* Munich ATP 250 SF Clay Nikolay Davydenko #40 6-3 4-0 (ret.) Radek Stepanek #67 Match data
Oct 17, 2009* Shanghai Masters Masters 1000 QF Hard Nikolay Davydenko #8 6-1 4-6 6-1 Radek Stepanek #16 Match data
Apr 25, 2009* Barcelona ATP 500 QF Clay Nikolay Davydenko #8 6-7(4) 6-2 6-2 Radek Stepanek #19 Match data
Aug 11, 2007* Canada Masters Masters 1000 QF Hard Radek Stepanek #60 6-4 7-5 Nikolay Davydenko #5 Match data
Feb 25, 2006* Rotterdam ATP 250 SF Hard Radek Stepanek #23 4-6 6-3 6-3 Nikolay Davydenko #6 Match data
Nov 6, 2005* Paris Masters Masters 1000 QF Carpet Radek Stepanek #14 7-5 6-4 Nikolay Davydenko #8 Match data
Oct 16, 2004* Moscow ATP 250 QF Carpet Nikolay Davydenko #43 7-6(2) 5-7 6-1 Radek Stepanek #70 Match data
Apr 15, 2004* Estoril ATP 250 R32 Clay Radek Stepanek #53 7-6(4) 6-3 Nikolay Davydenko #70 Match data
Oct 11, 2002* Vienna ATP 250 R16 Hard Nikolay Davydenko #80 6-1 5-7 7-5 Radek Stepanek #74 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nikolay Davydenko #248 #3 5,335 2,213 467 324 59.0% 0 3 1 1 16 21
Radek Stepanek #492 #8 2,700 2,034 366 283 56.4% 0 0 0 1 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nikolay Davydenko Radek Stepanek
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 2000 3–1 75.0% #133 1,544 0 0 1998 0–1 0.0% #165 1,488 0 0
20 2001 6–15 28.6% #79 1,568 0 0 1999 2–4 33.3% #169 1,501 0 0
21 2002 12–24 33.3% #81 1,601 0 0
22 2003 29–30 49.2% #44 1,595 0 2 2001 0–1 0.0% #542 1,464 0 0
23 2004 32–28 53.3% #28 1,758 0 4 2002 17–14 54.8% #63 1,659 0 0
24 2005 52–29 64.2% #5 1,868 0 5 2003 24–22 52.2% #46 1,716 0 0
25 2006 67–28 70.5% #3 1,971 0 10 2004 28–23 54.9% #33 1,790 0 0
26 2007 53–30 63.9% #4 1,935 0 11 2005 45–26 63.4% #20 1,840 0 0
27 2008 51–20 71.8% #5 1,974 0 14 2006 30–15 66.7% #19 1,865 0 1
28 2009 57–19 75.0% #6 2,142 0 19 2007 27–21 56.2% #30 1,863 0 2
29 2010 29–19 60.4% #22 1,897 0 20 2008 31–23 57.4% #27 1,837 0 2
30 2011 26–25 51.0% #41 1,848 0 21 2009 44–19 69.8% #12 2,010 0 4
31 2012 23–24 48.9% #44 1,824 0 21 2010 17–15 53.1% #62 1,872 0 4
32 2013 22–22 50.0% #53 1,824 0 21 2011 30–24 55.6% #28 1,880 0 5
33 2014 5–10 33.3% #250 1,730 0 21 2012 21–19 52.5% #31 1,930 0 5
34 2013 14–16 46.7% #44 1,828 0 5
35 2014 16–17 48.5% #68 1,801 0 5
36 2015 7–10 41.2% #197 1,766 0 5
37 2016 10–11 47.6% #107 1,866 0 5
38 2017 3–2 60.0% #354 1,900 0 5