H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Nikolay Davydenko vs Robin Haase H2H: 1-3
Robin Haase holds a 3–1 lead over Nikolay Davydenko in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Robin Haase leads 2–0 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Robin Haase won the 2014 Roland Garros first round 7-5 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 45
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
NED
Age 39
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 2014* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Robin Haase | 7-5 6-4 6-2 | Nikolay Davydenko | Match data |
| Aug 21, 2012* | Winston-Salem | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Robin Haase | 6-2 6-3 | Nikolay Davydenko | Match data |
| Feb 16, 2012* | Rotterdam | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Nikolay Davydenko | 7-5 6-2 | Robin Haase | Match data |
| Apr 12, 2011* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Robin Haase | 7-5 4-6 6-4 | Nikolay Davydenko | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nikolay Davydenko | #248 | #3 | 5,335 | 2,213 | 467 | 324 | 59.0% | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 16 | 21 |
| Robin Haase | #1,206 | #33 | 1,220 | 1,860 | 202 | 255 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nikolay Davydenko | Robin Haase | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2000 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #133 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #167 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2001 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #79 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #114 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2002 | 12–24 | 33.3% | #81 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #116 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2003 | 29–30 | 49.2% | #44 | 1,595 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2004 | 32–28 | 53.3% | #28 | 1,758 | 0 | 4 | 2010 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #65 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2005 | 52–29 | 64.2% | #5 | 1,868 | 0 | 5 | 2011 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #45 | 1,778 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2006 | 67–28 | 70.5% | #3 | 1,971 | 0 | 10 | 2012 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #56 | 1,700 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2007 | 53–30 | 63.9% | #4 | 1,935 | 0 | 11 | 2013 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #43 | 1,852 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2008 | 51–20 | 71.8% | #5 | 1,974 | 0 | 14 | 2014 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #83 | 1,715 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2009 | 57–19 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,142 | 0 | 19 | 2015 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #66 | 1,767 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2010 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #22 | 1,897 | 0 | 20 | 2016 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #59 | 1,756 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2011 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #41 | 1,848 | 0 | 21 | 2017 | 25–29 | 46.3% | #42 | 1,811 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2012 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #44 | 1,824 | 0 | 21 | 2018 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #50 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2013 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #53 | 1,824 | 0 | 21 | 2019 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #162 | 1,685 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 2014 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #250 | 1,730 | 0 | 21 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #197 | 1,661 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #230 | 1,615 | 0 | 2 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #258 | 1,568 | 0 | 2 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #756 | 1,531 | 0 | 2 |