H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Nikolay Davydenko vs Taylor Dent H2H: 1-1
Nikolay Davydenko and Taylor Dent are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Nikolay Davydenko won the 2009 Kuala Lumpur fourth round 6-3 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 45
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 45
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2, 2009* | Kuala Lumpur | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Nikolay Davydenko | 6-3 7-6(4) | Taylor Dent | Match data |
| Aug 29, 2003* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Taylor Dent | 6-3 6-4 7-6(7) | Nikolay Davydenko | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nikolay Davydenko | #248 | #3 | 5,335 | 2,213 | 467 | 324 | 59.0% | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 16 | 21 |
| Taylor Dent | #979 | #21 | 1,345 | 1,905 | 148 | 138 | 51.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nikolay Davydenko | Taylor Dent | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #410 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2000 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #133 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #181 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2001 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #79 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #124 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2002 | 12–24 | 33.3% | #81 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #57 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2003 | 29–30 | 49.2% | #44 | 1,595 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 28–12 | 70.0% | #33 | 1,883 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 2004 | 32–28 | 53.3% | #28 | 1,758 | 0 | 4 | 2004 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #32 | 1,744 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 2005 | 52–29 | 64.2% | #5 | 1,868 | 0 | 5 | 2005 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #29 | 1,783 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2006 | 67–28 | 70.5% | #3 | 1,971 | 0 | 10 | 2006 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #574 | 1,712 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2007 | 53–30 | 63.9% | #4 | 1,935 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2008 | 51–20 | 71.8% | #5 | 1,974 | 0 | 14 | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #865 | 1,671 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2009 | 57–19 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,142 | 0 | 19 | 2009 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #76 | 1,730 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2010 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #22 | 1,897 | 0 | 20 | 2010 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #118 | 1,776 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2011 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #41 | 1,848 | 0 | 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2012 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #44 | 1,824 | 0 | 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2013 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #53 | 1,824 | 0 | 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2014 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #250 | 1,730 | 0 | 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |