H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Nikolay Davydenko vs Thomas Johansson H2H: 3-2

Nikolay Davydenko holds a 3–2 lead over Thomas Johansson in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Nikolay Davydenko leads 2–1 on clay, while Thomas Johansson leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Nikolay Davydenko won the 2008 Roland Garros first round 6-3 6-3 6-3.

RUS Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
3 2
5 main draw meetings
SWE Age 51 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 27, 2008* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Nikolay Davydenko #4 6-3 6-3 6-3 Thomas Johansson #67 Match data
Apr 22, 2005* Barcelona ATP 250 R16 Clay Nikolay Davydenko #16 6-3 6-7(3) 7-6(2) Thomas Johansson #17 Match data
Mar 23, 2004* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R128 Hard Nikolay Davydenko #54 6-2 2-6 6-3 Thomas Johansson #202 Match data
Feb 12, 2004* Milan ATP 250 R32 Carpet Thomas Johansson #466 6-3 6-4 Nikolay Davydenko #52 Match data
May 3, 2001* Munich ATP 250 R32 Clay Thomas Johansson #23 7-6(1) 6-3 Nikolay Davydenko #106 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nikolay Davydenko #248 #3 5,335 2,213 467 324 59.0% 0 3 1 1 16 21
Thomas Johansson #586 #7 2,365 1,969 336 277 54.8% 1 1 0 0 7 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nikolay Davydenko Thomas Johansson
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1993 2–1 66.7% #422 1,535 0 0
19 2000 3–1 75.0% #133 1,544 0 0 1994 0–2 0.0% #486 1,496 0 0
20 2001 6–15 28.6% #79 1,568 0 0 1995 1–3 25.0% #117 1,492 0 0
21 2002 12–24 33.3% #81 1,601 0 0 1996 28–21 57.1% #60 1,763 0 0
22 2003 29–30 49.2% #44 1,595 0 2 1997 32–27 54.2% #39 1,699 0 2
23 2004 32–28 53.3% #28 1,758 0 4 1998 46–30 60.5% #17 1,899 0 2
24 2005 52–29 64.2% #5 1,868 0 5 1999 21–23 47.7% #39 1,725 0 3
25 2006 67–28 70.5% #3 1,971 0 10 2000 22–25 46.8% #39 1,825 0 4
26 2007 53–30 63.9% #4 1,935 0 11 2001 42–23 64.6% #18 1,875 0 6
27 2008 51–20 71.8% #5 1,974 0 14 2002 26–22 54.2% #14 1,746 1 7
28 2009 57–19 75.0% #6 2,142 0 19
29 2010 29–19 60.4% #22 1,897 0 20 2004 29–20 59.2% #30 1,855 1 8
30 2011 26–25 51.0% #41 1,848 0 21 2005 42–24 63.6% #13 1,892 1 9
31 2012 23–24 48.9% #44 1,824 0 21 2006 11–16 40.7% #71 1,723 1 9
32 2013 22–22 50.0% #53 1,824 0 21 2007 23–23 50.0% #62 1,759 1 9
33 2014 5–10 33.3% #250 1,730 0 21 2008 11–17 39.3% #136 1,673 1 9