H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 07:16 UTC
Nikolay Davydenko vs Todd Martin H2H: 0-1
Todd Martin holds a 1–0 lead over Nikolay Davydenko in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Todd Martin leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Todd Martin won the 2002 Houston fourth round 7-6(4) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 45
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 56
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 26, 2002* | Houston | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Todd Martin | 7-6(4) 6-3 | Nikolay Davydenko | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nikolay Davydenko | #248 | #3 | 5,335 | 2,213 | 467 | 324 | 59.0% | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 16 | 21 |
| Todd Martin | #145 | #4 | 2,969 | 2,063 | 398 | 222 | 64.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nikolay Davydenko | Todd Martin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2000 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #133 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #269 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2001 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #79 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #134 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2002 | 12–24 | 33.3% | #81 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #87 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2003 | 29–30 | 49.2% | #44 | 1,595 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 45–23 | 66.2% | #13 | 1,886 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2004 | 32–28 | 53.3% | #28 | 1,758 | 0 | 4 | 1994 | 50–19 | 72.5% | #10 | 1,943 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2005 | 52–29 | 64.2% | #5 | 1,868 | 0 | 5 | 1995 | 45–21 | 68.2% | #18 | 1,912 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2006 | 67–28 | 70.5% | #3 | 1,971 | 0 | 10 | 1996 | 49–20 | 71.0% | #12 | 1,926 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2007 | 53–30 | 63.9% | #4 | 1,935 | 0 | 11 | 1997 | 13–7 | 65.0% | #81 | 1,914 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 2008 | 51–20 | 71.8% | #5 | 1,974 | 0 | 14 | 1998 | 43–20 | 68.3% | #16 | 1,998 | 0 | 7 |
| 28 | 2009 | 57–19 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,142 | 0 | 19 | 1999 | 42–17 | 71.2% | #7 | 1,914 | 0 | 8 |
| 29 | 2010 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #22 | 1,897 | 0 | 20 | 2000 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #55 | 1,887 | 0 | 8 |
| 30 | 2011 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #41 | 1,848 | 0 | 21 | 2001 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #57 | 1,823 | 0 | 8 |
| 31 | 2012 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #44 | 1,824 | 0 | 21 | 2002 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #47 | 1,788 | 0 | 8 |
| 32 | 2013 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #53 | 1,824 | 0 | 21 | 2003 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #68 | 1,828 | 0 | 8 |
| 33 | 2014 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #250 | 1,730 | 0 | 21 | 2004 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #145 | 1,684 | 0 | 8 |