H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:16 UTC
Nikolay Davydenko vs Viktor Troicki H2H: 1-2
Viktor Troicki holds a 2–1 lead over Nikolay Davydenko in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Viktor Troicki leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Viktor Troicki won the 2011 Rome Masters second round 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 45
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
SRB
Age 40
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 10, 2011* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Viktor Troicki | 6-4 7-5 | Nikolay Davydenko | Match data |
| Mar 16, 2010* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Viktor Troicki | (w/o) | Nikolay Davydenko | Match data |
| May 12, 2009* | Madrid Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Nikolay Davydenko | 6-2 6-2 | Viktor Troicki | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nikolay Davydenko | #248 | #3 | 5,335 | 2,213 | 467 | 324 | 59.0% | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 16 | 21 |
| Viktor Troicki | #1,433 | #12 | 2,015 | 2,008 | 268 | 256 | 51.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nikolay Davydenko | Viktor Troicki | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2000 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #133 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2001 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #79 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #211 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2002 | 12–24 | 33.3% | #81 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #127 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2003 | 29–30 | 49.2% | #44 | 1,595 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,786 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2004 | 32–28 | 53.3% | #28 | 1,758 | 0 | 4 | 2009 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #29 | 1,803 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2005 | 52–29 | 64.2% | #5 | 1,868 | 0 | 5 | 2010 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #28 | 1,935 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2006 | 67–28 | 70.5% | #3 | 1,971 | 0 | 10 | 2011 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #22 | 1,846 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2007 | 53–30 | 63.9% | #4 | 1,935 | 0 | 11 | 2012 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #38 | 1,769 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2008 | 51–20 | 71.8% | #5 | 1,974 | 0 | 14 | 2013 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #75 | 1,823 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2009 | 57–19 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,142 | 0 | 19 | 2014 | 8–4 | 66.7% | #101 | 1,903 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2010 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #22 | 1,897 | 0 | 20 | 2015 | 33–27 | 55.0% | #22 | 1,844 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2011 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #41 | 1,848 | 0 | 21 | 2016 | 33–27 | 55.0% | #29 | 1,895 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2012 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #44 | 1,824 | 0 | 21 | 2017 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #55 | 1,814 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 2013 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #53 | 1,824 | 0 | 21 | 2018 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #205 | 1,647 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | 2014 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #250 | 1,730 | 0 | 21 | 2019 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #158 | 1,635 | 0 | 3 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #201 | 1,634 | 0 | 3 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #232 | 1,643 | 0 | 3 |