H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Nikoloz Basilashvili vs Aljaz Bedene H2H: 1-0
Nikoloz Basilashvili holds a 1–0 lead over Aljaz Bedene in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nikoloz Basilashvili leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nikoloz Basilashvili won the 2018 US Open first round 6-2 4-6 6-2 2-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Georgia
Age 34
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
SLO
Age 37
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29, 2018* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Nikoloz Basilashvili | 6-2 4-6 6-2 2-6 6-4 | Aljaz Bedene | Match data |
| Aug 26, 2014* | US Open | Grand Slam | Q2 | Hard | Aljaz Bedene | 6-3 6-3 | Nikoloz Basilashvili | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nikoloz Basilashvili | #135 | #16 | 2,156 | 1,953 | 149 | 180 | 45.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 5 |
| Aljaz Bedene | #1,030 | #43 | 1,169 | 1,893 | 130 | 159 | 45.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nikoloz Basilashvili | Aljaz Bedene | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #165 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #178 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #86 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2015 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #113 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #95 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2016 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #94 | 1,701 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #145 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2017 | 21–27 | 43.8% | #59 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,775 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2018 | 29–26 | 52.7% | #21 | 1,925 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #101 | 1,740 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2019 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #26 | 1,847 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #49 | 1,816 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2020 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #40 | 1,663 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #67 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2021 | 32–26 | 55.2% | #22 | 1,865 | 0 | 5 | 2019 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,838 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2022 | 15–27 | 35.7% | #91 | 1,647 | 0 | 5 | 2020 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #58 | 1,796 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2023 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #596 | 1,519 | 0 | 5 | 2021 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #109 | 1,773 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #347 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2025 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #109 | 1,704 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2026 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #135 | 1,654 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |