H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Nikoloz Basilashvili vs Facundo Bagnis H2H: 2-0
Nikoloz Basilashvili holds a 2–0 lead over Facundo Bagnis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Nikoloz Basilashvili leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Nikoloz Basilashvili won the 2022 Geneva third round 6-4 0-0 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Georgia
Age 34
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
Argentina
Age 36
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 18, 2022* | Geneva | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Nikoloz Basilashvili | 6-4 0-0 (ret.) | Facundo Bagnis | Match data |
| Jul 1, 2015* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Nikoloz Basilashvili | 6-4 7-6(3) 6-2 | Facundo Bagnis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nikoloz Basilashvili | #135 | #16 | 2,156 | 1,953 | 149 | 180 | 45.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 5 |
| Facundo Bagnis | #431 | #55 | 985 | 1,760 | 45 | 87 | 34.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nikoloz Basilashvili | Facundo Bagnis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #157 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #178 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #237 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2015 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #113 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2016 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #94 | 1,701 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #125 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2017 | 21–27 | 43.8% | #59 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #140 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2018 | 29–26 | 52.7% | #21 | 1,925 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #56 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2019 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #26 | 1,847 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #181 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2020 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #40 | 1,663 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #153 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2021 | 32–26 | 55.2% | #22 | 1,865 | 0 | 5 | 2019 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #137 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2022 | 15–27 | 35.7% | #91 | 1,647 | 0 | 5 | 2020 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #125 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2023 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #596 | 1,519 | 0 | 5 | 2021 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #76 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #89 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2025 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #109 | 1,704 | 0 | 5 | 2023 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #242 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | 2026 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #135 | 1,654 | 0 | 5 | 2024 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #144 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #398 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |