H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Nikoloz Basilashvili vs Kyle Edmund H2H: 1-2
Kyle Edmund holds a 2–1 lead over Nikoloz Basilashvili in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Kyle Edmund leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Nikoloz Basilashvili won the 2018 Beijing semifinal 7-6(6) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Georgia
Age 34
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
Great Britain
Age 31
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 6, 2018* | Beijing | ATP 500 | SF | Hard | Nikoloz Basilashvili | 7-6(6) 6-4 | Kyle Edmund | Match data |
| Jan 21, 2018* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Kyle Edmund | 7-6(0) 3-6 4-6 6-0 7-5 | Nikoloz Basilashvili | Match data |
| May 24, 2016* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Kyle Edmund | 7-6(4) 6-7(7) 7-5 6-1 | Nikoloz Basilashvili | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nikoloz Basilashvili | #135 | #16 | 2,156 | 1,953 | 149 | 180 | 45.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 5 |
| Kyle Edmund | #703 | #14 | 2,330 | 2,002 | 113 | 120 | 48.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nikoloz Basilashvili | Kyle Edmund | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #376 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #194 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #102 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #45 | 1,891 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #178 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #50 | 1,877 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2015 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #113 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #14 | 1,958 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2016 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #94 | 1,701 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #69 | 1,772 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2017 | 21–27 | 43.8% | #59 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #48 | 1,765 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2018 | 29–26 | 52.7% | #21 | 1,925 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2019 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #26 | 1,847 | 0 | 3 | 2022 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #581 | 1,736 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2020 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #40 | 1,663 | 0 | 3 | 2023 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #538 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2021 | 32–26 | 55.2% | #22 | 1,865 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2022 | 15–27 | 35.7% | #91 | 1,647 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2023 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #596 | 1,519 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2025 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #109 | 1,704 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2026 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #135 | 1,654 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |