H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Nikoloz Basilashvili vs Radu Albot H2H: 1-1
Nikoloz Basilashvili and Radu Albot are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Radu Albot won the 2019 Paris Masters second round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Georgia
Age 34
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
Moldova
Age 36
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 30, 2019* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Radu Albot | 6-3 6-2 | Nikoloz Basilashvili | Match data |
| Oct 8, 2019* | Shanghai Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Nikoloz Basilashvili | 4-6 6-1 6-3 | Radu Albot | Match data |
| Oct 24, 2016 | Vienna | ATP 500 | Q2 | Hard | Nikoloz Basilashvili | 6-3 0-6 6-3 | Radu Albot | Match data |
| Oct 15, 2012 | Moscow | ATP 250 | Q1 | Hard | Nikoloz Basilashvili | 6-3 1-6 7-5 | Radu Albot | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nikoloz Basilashvili | #135 | #16 | 2,156 | 1,953 | 149 | 180 | 45.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 5 |
| Radu Albot | #490 | #39 | 1,137 | 1,899 | 89 | 139 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nikoloz Basilashvili | Radu Albot | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 22 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #178 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2015 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #113 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2016 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #94 | 1,701 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #168 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2017 | 21–27 | 43.8% | #59 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #121 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2018 | 29–26 | 52.7% | #21 | 1,925 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #97 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2019 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #26 | 1,847 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #87 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2020 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #40 | 1,663 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #98 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2021 | 32–26 | 55.2% | #22 | 1,865 | 0 | 5 | 2019 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #46 | 1,817 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2022 | 15–27 | 35.7% | #91 | 1,647 | 0 | 5 | 2020 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #93 | 1,723 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2023 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #596 | 1,519 | 0 | 5 | 2021 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #123 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #103 | 1,662 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 2025 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #109 | 1,704 | 0 | 5 | 2023 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #131 | 1,648 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | 2026 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #135 | 1,654 | 0 | 5 | 2024 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #163 | 1,673 | 0 | 1 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #434 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 |