H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:16 UTC
Nikoloz Basilashvili vs Thiago Monteiro H2H: 1-2
Thiago Monteiro holds a 2–1 lead over Nikoloz Basilashvili in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Thiago Monteiro leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Thiago Monteiro won the 2022 Winston-Salem third round 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Georgia
Age 34
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
Brazil
Age 32
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 24, 2022* | Winston-Salem | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Thiago Monteiro | 6-4 6-1 | Nikoloz Basilashvili | Match data |
| Apr 29, 2021* | Munich | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Nikoloz Basilashvili | 6-2 6-3 | Thiago Monteiro | Match data |
| Sep 29, 2020* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Thiago Monteiro | 7-5 6-4 6-2 | Nikoloz Basilashvili | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nikoloz Basilashvili | #135 | #16 | 2,156 | 1,953 | 149 | 180 | 45.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 5 |
| Thiago Monteiro | #290 | #61 | 954 | 1,780 | 81 | 119 | 40.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nikoloz Basilashvili | Thiago Monteiro | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 22 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #178 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #82 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2015 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #113 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #124 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2016 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #94 | 1,701 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #120 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2017 | 21–27 | 43.8% | #59 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #89 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2018 | 29–26 | 52.7% | #21 | 1,925 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #84 | 1,686 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2019 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #26 | 1,847 | 0 | 3 | 2021 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #89 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2020 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #40 | 1,663 | 0 | 3 | 2022 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #71 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2021 | 32–26 | 55.2% | #22 | 1,865 | 0 | 5 | 2023 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #122 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2022 | 15–27 | 35.7% | #91 | 1,647 | 0 | 5 | 2024 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #109 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2023 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #596 | 1,519 | 0 | 5 | 2025 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #197 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #290 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2025 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #109 | 1,704 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2026 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #135 | 1,654 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |