H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Nikoloz Basilashvili vs Thomas Fabbiano H2H: 2-0
Nikoloz Basilashvili holds a 2–0 lead over Thomas Fabbiano in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Nikoloz Basilashvili leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nikoloz Basilashvili won the 2018 Miami Masters first round 1-6 6-2 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Georgia
Age 34
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 37
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 23, 2018* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Nikoloz Basilashvili | 1-6 6-2 7-5 | Thomas Fabbiano | Match data |
| Jan 3, 2018* | Doha | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Nikoloz Basilashvili | 6-4 6-3 | Thomas Fabbiano | Match data |
| Sep 1, 2015* | US Open | Grand Slam | Q3 | Hard | Nikoloz Basilashvili | 6-4 4-6 6-1 | Thomas Fabbiano | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nikoloz Basilashvili | #135 | #16 | 2,156 | 1,953 | 149 | 180 | 45.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 5 |
| Thomas Fabbiano | #1,768 | #70 | 715 | 1,748 | 27 | 62 | 30.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nikoloz Basilashvili | Thomas Fabbiano | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #371 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #313 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #178 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2015 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #113 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2016 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #94 | 1,701 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #180 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2017 | 21–27 | 43.8% | #59 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2018 | 29–26 | 52.7% | #21 | 1,925 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #157 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2019 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #26 | 1,847 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #124 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2020 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #40 | 1,663 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #73 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2021 | 32–26 | 55.2% | #22 | 1,865 | 0 | 5 | 2018 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #101 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2022 | 15–27 | 35.7% | #91 | 1,647 | 0 | 5 | 2019 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #114 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2023 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #596 | 1,519 | 0 | 5 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #172 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #204 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2025 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #109 | 1,704 | 0 | 5 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #317 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | 2026 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #135 | 1,654 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |