H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Noam Okun vs Mike Bryan H2H: 0-1

Mike Bryan holds a 1–0 lead over Noam Okun in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mike Bryan leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mike Bryan won the 2003 Washington Open round of 32 6-1 6-7(9) 7-6(4).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Noam Okun
ISR Age 48 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Mike Bryan
USA Age 48 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mike Bryan 6-1 6-7(9) 7-6(4) Noam Okun #175 Match data Jul 31, 2003* R32 Washington Open ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Noam Okun #1,046 #95 411 1,627 20 43 31.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mike Bryan #684 #246 138 1,528 5 9 35.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Noam Okun Mike Bryan
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 — — — — — — — 1997 0–1 0.0% #531 1,484 0 0
21 1999 0–1 0.0% #187 1,492 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2000 0–1 0.0% #532 1,534 0 0 2000 1–2 33.3% #299 1,450 0 0
23 2001 2–4 33.3% #117 1,571 0 0 2001 1–3 25.0% #337 1,485 0 0
24 2002 8–15 34.8% #128 1,587 0 0 2002 1–2 33.3% #609 1,494 0 0
25 2003 2–4 33.3% #168 1,552 0 0 2003 2–1 66.7% #678 1,520 0 0
26 2004 4–5 44.4% #141 1,544 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 2005 3–8 27.3% #194 1,594 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 2006 1–2 33.3% #178 1,596 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 2008 0–1 0.0% #431 1,526 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 2010 0–2 0.0% #355 1,563 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Noam Okun Mike Bryan
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1999 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2000 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2001 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2001 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 2002 6 11 17 35.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2002 — — — — — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
25 2003 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2004 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2005 2 6 8 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2006 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 16 33 49 32.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 60/63 of Noam Okun's and 13/14 of Mike Bryan's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Noam Okun Mike Bryan
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1997 1/1 5.0 4.0 63.6% 73.2% 50.0% 63.6% 50.0% 64.8% 32.5%
21 1999 1/1 1.0 3.0 55.0% 68.2% 41.7% 58.3% 42.9% 56.3% 36.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2000 1/1 8.0 8.0 62.1% 70.0% 41.8% 66.7% 33.3% 59.3% 40.7% 2000 3/3 2.7 2.0 68.5% 65.2% 49.1% 53.2% 57.8% 60.5% 33.3%
23 2001 6/6 3.3 2.3 62.9% 70.8% 45.5% 56.7% 33.8% 61.8% 32.5% 2001 4/4 3.3 3.3 59.3% 69.3% 44.9% 54.5% 51.8% 60.0% 33.9%
24 2002 20/23 6.1 3.7 58.7% 69.4% 53.1% 63.9% 38.1% 62.6% 34.3% 2002 2/3 4.5 3.0 50.4% 70.3% 51.4% 45.8% 26.8% 60.8% 39.6%
25 2003 6/6 4.8 3.2 62.0% 69.7% 53.4% 59.1% 45.9% 63.5% 33.2% 2003 3/3 2.7 1.7 65.9% 73.4% 44.0% 47.6% 56.3% 63.3% 37.0%
26 2004 9/9 5.0 2.6 62.1% 69.2% 52.7% 57.4% 46.2% 63.0% 35.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2005 11/11 4.5 2.6 65.0% 66.0% 49.1% 55.2% 27.1% 59.7% 36.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2006 3/3 11.3 4.0 60.3% 66.8% 54.7% 78.6% 53.3% 61.5% 39.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2008 1/1 7.0 2.0 64.2% 70.6% 63.2% 80.0% 33.3% 67.9% 33.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2010 2/2 4.5 4.0 60.7% 66.5% 45.1% 70.8% 66.7% 58.1% 26.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 60/63 5.4 3.2 61.3% 68.7% 51.2% 61.3% 39.3% 61.9% 34.7% — 13/14 3.3 2.6 61.9% 69.7% 47.1% 52.0% 50.2% 61.4% 35.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Noam Okun Mike Bryan
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1484 98.2 -0.78 -4.21 0.923 49.1% — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.12
21 1999 1493 103.1 +1.05 -1.21 0.841 46.1% — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — -0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2000 1534 113.1 -2.71 +5.66 1.001 50.4% — — — 40.0% -0.60 0–1 — — -0.20 2000 1451 95.4 +0.01 -1.57 0.843 47.2% +22 — — 37.5% -0.50 1–1 1–1 — +0.45
23 2001 1572 114.4 -0.77 +0.78 0.851 46.8% +24 — — 30.8% -1.00 1–0 1–2 (33%) — -0.53 2001 1485 109.6 -0.31 -0.74 0.848 47.7% +42 — — 22.2% -1.55 — — — -0.04
24 2002 1588 120.8 -0.03 -2.16 0.916 48.6% +34 — -85 41.4% -0.59 0–6 (0%) 8–9 (47%) — +0.96 2002 1494 108.8 -1.65 -0.69 1.009 49.3% — — +10 33.3% -1.33 — 0–1 — -0.30
25 2003 1552 110.2 -0.26 -1.04 0.909 48.5% +34 — — 43.8% -0.50 1–3 (25%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.36 2003 1521 107.7 -1.74 +1.45 1.008 51.0% +32 — — 57.1% +0.72 1–0 1–1 — +0.15
26 2004 1545 113.6 -1.16 -0.05 0.953 49.2% +40 — — 47.6% -0.33 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) — -0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2005 1595 110.9 -2.13 -0.23 0.915 48.1% -30 — — 35.7% -0.75 0–2 1–4 (20%) — -0.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2006 1596 107.7 -1.10 -2.34 1.027 51.0% -19 — — 45.5% +0.82 0–1 0–1 — +0.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2007 1520 96.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2008 1527 108.5 +0.07 -0.51 1.039 51.8% — — — 33.3% 0.00 0–1 0–1 — -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2009 1543 107.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2010 1563 110.6 -1.10 -2.71 0.625 44.8% — — — 0.0% -1.75 — 0–2 — +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1628 117.4 -0.80 -0.94 0.911 48.4% +20 — -85 39.5% -0.54 3–17 (15%) 14–22 (39%) 82.9 +0.94 — 1528 107.0 -0.81 -0.69 0.912 48.7% +32 — +10 36.4% -0.75 2–2 (50%) 2–3 (40%) 97.2 +2.71

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.