H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC

Novak Djokovic vs Albert Ramos-Vinolas H2H: 5-0

Novak Djokovic holds a 5–0 lead over Albert Ramos-Vinolas in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Novak Djokovic leads 3–0 on clay and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Novak Djokovic won the 2018 Rome Masters fourth round 6-1 7-5.

Serbia Age 39 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
5 0
5 main draw meetings
Spain Age 38 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 18, 2018* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R16 Clay Novak Djokovic #18 6-1 7-5 Albert Ramos-Vinolas #41 Match data
Jan 21, 2018* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Novak Djokovic #14 6-2 6-3 6-3 Albert Ramos-Vinolas #22 Match data
Jun 6, 2017* Roland Garros Grand Slam R16 Clay Novak Djokovic #2 7-6(5) 6-1 6-3 Albert Ramos-Vinolas #20 Match data
Apr 15, 2015* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Novak Djokovic #1 6-1 6-4 Albert Ramos-Vinolas #67 Match data
Mar 17, 2015* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Novak Djokovic #1 7-5 6-3 Albert Ramos-Vinolas #68 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Novak Djokovic #7 #1 16,950 2,593 1,122 223 83.4% 24 40 7 14 15 100
Albert Ramos-Vinolas #477 #17 2,180 1,966 276 327 45.8% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Novak Djokovic Albert Ramos-Vinolas
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2004 1–3 25.0% #186 1,490 0 0
18 2005 9–9 50.0% #78 1,732 0 0
19 2006 35–17 67.3% #16 1,884 0 2
20 2007 65–19 77.4% #3 2,067 0 7
21 2008 58–15 79.5% #3 2,120 1 11
22 2009 78–17 82.1% #3 2,267 1 16 2010 2–4 33.3% #123 1,554 0 0
23 2010 56–18 75.7% #3 2,166 1 18 2011 13–16 44.8% #66 1,722 0 0
24 2011 72–6 92.3% #1 2,357 4 28 2012 26–30 46.4% #50 1,732 0 0
25 2012 71–10 87.7% #1 2,429 5 34 2013 19–22 46.3% #83 1,647 0 0
26 2013 67–9 88.2% #2 2,469 6 41 2014 13–20 39.4% #63 1,725 0 0
27 2014 65–8 89.0% #1 2,463 7 48 2015 16–23 41.0% #54 1,768 0 0
28 2015 82–6 93.2% #1 2,554 10 59 2016 34–30 53.1% #27 1,886 0 1
29 2016 64–8 88.9% #2 2,450 12 66 2017 33–30 52.4% #23 1,813 0 1
30 2017 31–8 79.5% #12 2,293 12 68 2018 18–28 39.1% #65 1,700 0 1
31 2018 53–12 81.5% #1 2,332 14 72 2019 30–24 55.6% #41 1,854 0 2
32 2019 55–11 83.3% #2 2,264 16 77 2020 9–14 39.1% #46 1,704 0 2
33 2020 35–5 87.5% #1 2,275 17 81 2021 24–25 49.0% #45 1,730 0 3
34 2021 46–5 90.2% #1 2,372 20 86 2022 24–27 47.1% #39 1,741 0 4
35 2022 42–6 87.5% #5 2,368 21 91 2023 12–23 34.3% #89 1,660 0 4
36 2023 54–6 90.0% #1 2,405 24 98 2024 3–9 25.0% #165 1,570 0 4
37 2024 29–9 76.3% #7 2,226 24 98 2025 0–2 0.0% #403 1,570 0 4
38 2025 39–11 78.0% #4 2,174 24 100
39 2026 15–5 75.0% #7 2,155 24 100