H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Novak Djokovic vs Andreas Seppi H2H: 12-0
Novak Djokovic holds a 12–0 lead over Andreas Seppi in their ATP head-to-head. Across 12 main-draw meetings, Novak Djokovic leads 8–0 on hard courts and 4–0 on clay. Most recently, Novak Djokovic won the 2016 Australian Open third round 6-1 7-5 7-6(6).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Serbia
Age 39
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
12
–
0
12 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 42
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 24, 2016* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 6-1 7-5 7-6(6) | Andreas Seppi | Match data |
| Sep 6, 2015* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 6-3 7-5 7-5 | Andreas Seppi | Match data |
| Mar 1, 2013* | Dubai | ATP 500 | QF | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 6-0 6-3 | Andreas Seppi | Match data |
| Aug 15, 2012* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 7-6(4) 6-2 | Andreas Seppi | Match data |
| Jun 5, 2012* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R16 | Clay | Novak Djokovic | 4-6 6-7(5) 6-3 7-5 6-3 | Andreas Seppi | Match data |
| Apr 18, 2012* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Novak Djokovic | 6-1 6-4 | Andreas Seppi | Match data |
| May 15, 2009* | Madrid Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Clay | Novak Djokovic | 6-4 6-4 | Andreas Seppi | Match data |
| May 9, 2009* | Belgrade | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Novak Djokovic | 4-6 6-1 6-2 | Andreas Seppi | Match data |
| Aug 1, 2008* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 6-1 6-2 | Andreas Seppi | Match data |
| Mar 16, 2008* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 6-3 7-6(3) | Andreas Seppi | Match data |
| Oct 13, 2007* | Vienna | ATP 500 | SF | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 6-4 6-3 | Andreas Seppi | Match data |
| Feb 23, 2006* | Rotterdam | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 6-2 2-6 7-5 | Andreas Seppi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Novak Djokovic | #7 | #1 | 16,950 | 2,593 | 1,122 | 223 | 83.4% | 24 | 40 | 7 | 14 | 15 | 100 |
| Andreas Seppi | #1,188 | #18 | 1,895 | 1,977 | 363 | 397 | 47.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Novak Djokovic | Andreas Seppi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2004 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #186 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2005 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #78 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2006 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #16 | 1,884 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #240 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2007 | 65–19 | 77.4% | #3 | 2,067 | 0 | 7 | 2004 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #146 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2008 | 58–15 | 79.5% | #3 | 2,120 | 1 | 11 | 2005 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #68 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2009 | 78–17 | 82.1% | #3 | 2,267 | 1 | 16 | 2006 | 19–28 | 40.4% | #74 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2010 | 56–18 | 75.7% | #3 | 2,166 | 1 | 18 | 2007 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #50 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2011 | 72–6 | 92.3% | #1 | 2,357 | 4 | 28 | 2008 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #35 | 1,748 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2012 | 71–10 | 87.7% | #1 | 2,429 | 5 | 34 | 2009 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #49 | 1,754 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2013 | 67–9 | 88.2% | #2 | 2,469 | 6 | 41 | 2010 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #52 | 1,719 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2014 | 65–8 | 89.0% | #1 | 2,463 | 7 | 48 | 2011 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #38 | 1,806 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2015 | 82–6 | 93.2% | #1 | 2,554 | 10 | 59 | 2012 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #23 | 1,921 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2016 | 64–8 | 88.9% | #2 | 2,450 | 12 | 66 | 2013 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #25 | 1,831 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2017 | 31–8 | 79.5% | #12 | 2,293 | 12 | 68 | 2014 | 22–27 | 44.9% | #45 | 1,774 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2018 | 53–12 | 81.5% | #1 | 2,332 | 14 | 72 | 2015 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #29 | 1,870 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 2019 | 55–11 | 83.3% | #2 | 2,264 | 16 | 77 | 2016 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #87 | 1,794 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | 2020 | 35–5 | 87.5% | #1 | 2,275 | 17 | 81 | 2017 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #86 | 1,740 | 0 | 3 |
| 34 | 2021 | 46–5 | 90.2% | #1 | 2,372 | 20 | 86 | 2018 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #37 | 1,783 | 0 | 3 |
| 35 | 2022 | 42–6 | 87.5% | #5 | 2,368 | 21 | 91 | 2019 | 17–24 | 41.5% | #72 | 1,750 | 0 | 3 |
| 36 | 2023 | 54–6 | 90.0% | #1 | 2,405 | 24 | 98 | 2020 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #106 | 1,653 | 0 | 3 |
| 37 | 2024 | 29–9 | 76.3% | #7 | 2,226 | 24 | 98 | 2021 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #102 | 1,652 | 0 | 3 |
| 38 | 2025 | 39–11 | 78.0% | #4 | 2,174 | 24 | 100 | 2022 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #354 | 1,606 | 0 | 3 |
| 39 | 2026 | 15–5 | 75.0% | #7 | 2,155 | 24 | 100 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |