H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Novak Djokovic vs Daniil Medvedev H2H: 8-5

Novak Djokovic holds an 8–5 lead over Daniil Medvedev in their ATP head-to-head. Across 13 main-draw meetings, Novak Djokovic leads 7–4 on hard courts, while Daniil Medvedev leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Novak Djokovic won the 2023 US Open final 6-3 7-6(5) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Novak Djokovic
Serbia Age 39 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
8 – 5
13 main draw meetings
Daniil Medvedev
Russia Age 30 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Novak Djokovic #2 6-3 7-6(5) 6-3 Daniil Medvedev #3 Match data Sep 10, 2023* F US Open Grand Slam Hard
Daniil Medvedev #7 6-4 6-4 Novak Djokovic #1 Match data Mar 4, 2023* SF Dubai Tennis Championships ATP 500 Hard
Novak Djokovic #5 6-3 6-4 Daniil Medvedev #7 Match data Jan 7, 2023* SF Adelaide 1 ATP 250 Hard
Novak Djokovic #8 6-3 6-7(5) 7-6(2) Daniil Medvedev #5 Match data Nov 14, 2022 RR ATP Finals ATP Finals Hard
Novak Djokovic #7 4-6 7-6(6) 0-0 (ret.) Daniil Medvedev #4 Match data Oct 8, 2022* SF Almaty Open ATP 500 Hard
Novak Djokovic #1 4-6 6-3 6-3 Daniil Medvedev #2 Match data Nov 7, 2021* F Paris Masters Masters 1000 Hard
Daniil Medvedev #2 6-4 6-4 6-4 Novak Djokovic #1 Match data Sep 12, 2021* F US Open Grand Slam Hard
Novak Djokovic #1 7-5 6-2 6-2 Daniil Medvedev #4 Match data Feb 21, 2021* F Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Daniil Medvedev #4 6-3 6-3 Novak Djokovic #1 Match data Nov 16, 2020 RR ATP Finals ATP Finals Hard
Daniil Medvedev #8 3-6 6-3 6-3 Novak Djokovic #1 Match data Aug 17, 2019* SF Cincinnati Open Masters 1000 Hard
Daniil Medvedev #14 6-3 4-6 6-2 Novak Djokovic #1 Match data Apr 20, 2019* QF Monte-Carlo Masters Masters 1000 Clay
Novak Djokovic #1 6-4 6-7(5) 6-2 6-3 Daniil Medvedev #19 Match data Jan 22, 2019* R16 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Novak Djokovic #4 6-4 6-4 Daniil Medvedev #52 Match data Jul 1, 2017* SF Eastbourne Open ATP 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS Olympics 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Novak Djokovic #5 #1 16,950 2,593 1,141 231 83.2% 24 1 40 7 15 14 101
Daniil Medvedev #8 #1 10,780 2,280 434 187 69.9% 1 0 6 1 5 10 23

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Novak Djokovic Daniil Medvedev
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2004 1–3 25.0% #186 1,490 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2005 9–9 50.0% #78 1,733 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2006 35–17 67.3% #16 1,884 0 2 — — — — — — —
20 2007 65–19 77.4% #3 2,068 0 7 2016 5–5 50.0% #99 1,685 0 0
21 2008 63–16 79.7% #3 2,130 1 11 2017 22–23 48.9% #65 1,739 0 0
22 2009 78–17 82.1% #3 2,273 1 16 2018 41–23 64.1% #16 2,033 0 3
23 2010 56–18 75.7% #3 2,163 1 18 2019 58–21 73.4% #5 2,126 0 7
24 2011 72–6 92.3% #1 2,382 4 28 2020 24–9 72.7% #4 2,180 0 9
25 2012 75–12 86.2% #1 2,425 5 34 2021 53–13 80.3% #2 2,239 1 13
26 2013 67–9 88.2% #2 2,471 6 41 2022 42–18 70.0% #7 2,060 1 15
27 2014 65–8 89.0% #1 2,450 7 48 2023 67–18 78.8% #3 2,161 1 20
28 2015 82–6 93.2% #1 2,554 10 59 2024 46–19 70.8% #5 2,090 1 20
29 2016 64–9 87.7% #2 2,429 12 66 2025 43–23 65.2% #13 1,950 1 21
30 2017 31–8 79.5% #12 2,281 12 68 2026 33–15 68.8% #8 1,885 1 23
31 2018 53–12 81.5% #1 2,332 14 72 — — — — — — —
32 2019 55–11 83.3% #2 2,262 16 77 — — — — — — —
33 2020 35–5 87.5% #1 2,277 17 81 — — — — — — —
34 2021 50–7 87.7% #1 2,339 20 86 — — — — — — —
35 2022 42–6 87.5% #5 2,353 21 91 — — — — — — —
36 2023 54–6 90.0% #1 2,402 24 98 — — — — — — —
37 2024 35–9 79.5% #7 2,273 24 99 — — — — — — —
38 2025 39–11 78.0% #4 2,191 24 101 — — — — — — —
39 2026 15–7 68.2% #5 2,094 24 101 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Novak Djokovic Daniil Medvedev
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2004 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2005 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2006 14 8 22 63.6% 14 5 19 73.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2007 43 12 55 78.2% 16 5 21 76.2% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2016 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
21 2008 42 11 53 79.2% 16 3 19 84.2% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2017 14 15 29 48.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 8 4 12 66.7% — — — —
22 2009 53 11 64 82.8% 17 4 21 81.0% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — — 2018 36 14 50 72.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — —
23 2010 40 12 52 76.9% 10 4 14 71.4% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2019 45 13 58 77.6% 8 5 13 61.5% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
24 2011 46 5 51 90.2% 19 1 20 95.0% 7 0 7 100.0% — — — — 2020 24 7 31 77.4% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2012 50 5 55 90.9% 16 4 20 80.0% 9 3 12 75.0% — — — — 2021 41 8 49 83.7% 5 3 8 62.5% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — —
26 2013 49 5 54 90.7% 12 3 15 80.0% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — — 2022 31 13 44 70.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 8 3 11 72.7% — — — —
27 2014 44 6 50 88.0% 14 2 16 87.5% 7 0 7 100.0% — — — — 2023 50 12 62 80.6% 10 3 13 76.9% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — —
28 2015 59 5 64 92.2% 16 1 17 94.1% 7 0 7 100.0% — — — — 2024 29 12 41 70.7% 11 5 16 68.8% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
29 2016 46 6 52 88.5% 16 2 18 88.9% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2025 31 16 47 66.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
30 2017 10 3 13 76.9% 13 4 17 76.5% 8 1 9 88.9% — — — — 2026 22 8 30 73.3% 5 4 9 55.6% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
31 2018 31 6 37 83.8% 11 5 16 68.8% 11 1 12 91.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2019 32 8 40 80.0% 16 3 19 84.2% 7 0 7 100.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2020 24 4 28 85.7% 11 1 12 91.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2021 25 4 29 86.2% 18 3 21 85.7% 7 0 7 100.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2022 20 2 22 90.9% 15 4 19 78.9% 7 0 7 100.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2023 36 2 38 94.7% 12 3 15 80.0% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2024 13 4 17 76.5% 16 4 20 80.0% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2025 25 7 32 78.1% 9 3 12 75.0% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2026 8 4 12 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 712 134 846 84.2% 292 71 363 80.4% 131 22 153 85.6% 6 4 10 60.0% — 326 120 446 73.1% 51 39 90 56.7% 57 28 85 67.1% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 1,324/1,372 of Novak Djokovic's and 609/622 of Daniil Medvedev's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Novak Djokovic Daniil Medvedev
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2004 4/4 6.5 5.3 62.5% 59.7% 42.5% 44.3% 38.4% 53.1% 41.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2005 18/18 4.9 3.2 63.1% 69.1% 48.2% 60.2% 44.6% 61.2% 37.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2006 52/52 5.5 3.0 63.0% 72.3% 53.1% 59.7% 49.3% 65.1% 40.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2007 83/84 6.2 2.3 64.2% 73.1% 54.5% 64.7% 44.4% 66.4% 41.0% 2016 10/10 5.4 2.0 59.9% 71.2% 46.0% 52.1% 43.8% 61.5% 42.0%
21 2008 73/79 6.3 2.0 64.7% 74.2% 58.0% 67.4% 50.9% 68.6% 42.6% 2017 45/45 7.3 4.0 60.6% 71.5% 49.0% 59.7% 42.9% 62.9% 35.4%
22 2009 95/95 5.3 2.8 63.1% 73.3% 54.3% 63.6% 43.6% 66.3% 42.5% 2018 63/64 6.8 3.8 57.6% 74.4% 51.1% 63.9% 41.2% 64.7% 36.9%
23 2010 72/74 4.2 3.9 64.0% 71.6% 54.0% 65.8% 48.0% 65.2% 42.4% 2019 79/79 8.7 3.2 59.8% 76.4% 55.9% 54.9% 45.9% 68.2% 41.2%
24 2011 75/78 4.6 1.9 65.5% 74.8% 57.2% 63.6% 51.1% 68.6% 46.2% 2020 33/33 9.4 2.6 61.6% 79.0% 55.4% 66.1% 44.5% 70.3% 40.1%
25 2012 81/87 5.6 1.8 64.5% 75.7% 56.9% 65.1% 50.8% 69.1% 44.0% 2021 62/66 9.5 3.0 62.7% 79.2% 54.1% 59.7% 46.6% 69.7% 41.8%
26 2013 76/76 6.3 1.6 65.8% 76.3% 62.2% 64.6% 45.0% 71.3% 44.6% 2022 60/60 9.2 4.0 64.6% 76.5% 51.3% 67.8% 47.6% 67.6% 40.6%
27 2014 69/73 6.2 1.5 67.0% 75.5% 57.5% 60.3% 47.7% 69.6% 44.3% 2023 84/85 7.0 4.1 64.5% 76.2% 50.8% 62.5% 46.8% 67.0% 41.5%
28 2015 87/88 5.4 1.6 66.7% 75.4% 61.4% 62.8% 48.1% 70.7% 44.3% 2024 62/65 6.9 4.8 61.2% 73.1% 49.9% 57.7% 46.1% 64.3% 39.9%
29 2016 71/73 3.8 2.4 64.8% 75.0% 57.4% 62.1% 49.2% 68.6% 44.5% 2025 64/66 8.3 4.3 62.3% 76.2% 51.4% 52.7% 38.3% 66.6% 40.6%
30 2017 38/39 4.1 1.9 66.8% 73.4% 53.8% 61.4% 47.9% 66.8% 41.1% 2026 47/49 7.7 4.1 65.3% 73.8% 48.4% 61.4% 43.2% 65.1% 40.9%
31 2018 65/65 5.3 2.3 66.4% 75.5% 58.1% 64.1% 45.1% 69.7% 42.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2019 65/66 5.7 2.6 66.1% 77.4% 59.4% 63.1% 53.6% 71.3% 42.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2020 40/40 6.1 2.8 64.1% 75.9% 53.8% 64.3% 43.4% 67.9% 44.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2021 50/57 8.3 2.7 64.8% 76.7% 54.6% 59.4% 48.3% 68.9% 44.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2022 47/48 6.0 1.9 65.8% 78.5% 58.2% 59.4% 46.9% 71.7% 41.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2023 60/60 7.2 2.9 63.5% 78.0% 57.9% 60.8% 45.3% 70.7% 41.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2024 36/44 7.3 2.7 63.8% 76.0% 56.7% 61.5% 43.5% 69.1% 41.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2025 46/50 8.2 2.1 67.2% 76.8% 55.8% 53.0% 47.1% 69.9% 39.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
39 2026 21/22 8.8 3.5 68.2% 74.6% 54.0% 64.4% 39.0% 67.8% 36.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1,324/1,372 5.8 2.3 65.1% 75.0% 56.7% 62.7% 47.4% 68.6% 42.8% — 609/622 8.0 3.8 62.0% 75.6% 51.7% 60.1% 44.5% 66.6% 40.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Novak Djokovic Daniil Medvedev
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2004 1491 107.5 -0.98 -0.85 0.885 47.7% — +57 — 36.4% -0.91 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — +0.01 2013 1484 95.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2005 1733 128.8 -0.13 +0.84 0.974 49.7% -92 -124 -27 51.0% -0.14 2–2 (50%) 8–2 (80%) — -0.77 2014 1487 101.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2006 1885 144.3 +2.58 +1.86 1.145 52.6% -115 -18 -101 63.6% +0.85 10–6 (63%) 14–5 (74%) — +0.06 2015 1508 108.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2007 2069 168.7 +4.20 +4.63 1.219 53.6% -9 -83 -156 70.3% +1.30 18–6 (75%) 28–13 (68%) — -0.04 2016 1686 125.7 -0.92 +1.52 1.091 51.8% -58 -63 — 47.8% +0.39 2–3 (40%) 1–3 (25%) — +0.68
21 2008 2130 172.3 +5.71 +7.08 1.355 55.3% +34 +15 -166 75.3% +1.68 8–6 (57%) 18–12 (60%) — -1.51 2017 1740 146.3 -0.73 +0.04 0.954 49.5% -69 -182 +107 48.6% -0.11 10–6 (63%) 10–7 (59%) — +0.25
22 2009 2274 175.6 +3.72 +6.70 1.260 54.2% +35 -48 -230 74.9% +1.62 18–4 (82%) 19–15 (56%) — +2.04 2018 2034 157.6 +1.04 +1.47 1.046 50.9% +11 -502 -192 59.6% +0.40 13–8 (62%) 11–9 (55%) — -1.36
23 2010 2163 172.7 +2.60 +6.48 1.220 53.7% +62 0 -55 71.1% +1.38 9–7 (56%) 11–8 (58%) — +0.94 2019 2127 174.7 +4.17 +5.57 1.295 54.1% +39 -430 -272 70.3% +1.22 9–11 (45%) 23–10 (70%) — -0.18
24 2011 2383 182.8 +6.53 +9.98 1.473 57.2% +13 -31 -72 82.9% +2.35 14–2 (88%) 8–7 (53%) — -1.11 2020 2180 169.6 +6.03 +3.69 1.347 54.2% +45 — — 67.0% +1.30 7–3 (70%) 5–5 (50%) — -0.98
25 2012 2426 182.4 +6.77 +8.20 1.427 56.2% +70 -20 -80 77.8% +2.07 16–3 (84%) 17–12 (59%) — -2.53 2021 2239 172.8 +6.07 +5.71 1.378 55.1% +60 -456 -284 73.4% +1.60 13–5 (72%) 10–11 (48%) — -1.39
26 2013 2471 184.6 +8.33 +8.48 1.555 57.0% +86 -60 -72 79.4% +2.09 15–6 (71%) 19–9 (68%) — -1.97 2022 2061 170.2 +3.94 +4.83 1.253 54.0% +76 -213 -40 70.9% +1.29 3–9 (25%) 16–9 (64%) — -0.62
27 2014 2451 184.1 +6.63 +9.04 1.457 56.5% +45 +29 +72 78.4% +2.05 15–2 (88%) 13–10 (57%) — -1.15 2023 2162 177.0 +4.02 +6.16 1.258 54.0% +62 -194 -88 71.4% +1.44 14–6 (70%) 16–15 (52%) — -3.49
28 2015 2554 186.4 +7.05 +9.59 1.509 56.9% +60 +29 +50 83.8% +2.33 16–2 (89%) 17–9 (65%) — +0.06 2024 2091 167.2 +1.18 +4.88 1.118 52.0% +49 -130 +43 64.1% +0.74 11–4 (73%) 20–8 (71%) — -1.43
29 2016 2430 183.4 +5.55 +8.54 1.418 56.0% +83 +151 +115 81.8% +2.05 8–1 (89%) 19–7 (73%) — -0.65 2025 1951 157.6 +2.07 +4.31 1.216 53.1% +40 -8 +114 60.6% +0.85 14–12 (54%) 14–16 (47%) — +3.07
30 2017 2281 169.1 +3.30 +4.52 1.236 53.9% +127 +161 +137 73.4% +1.50 8–2 (80%) 10–5 (67%) — -0.74 2026 1885 156.4 +0.78 +4.95 1.172 52.8% +120 +15 +122 63.9% +1.01 8–7 (53%) 6–13 (32%) — +1.68
31 2018 2333 175.5 +5.76 +7.04 1.406 55.3% +44 +2 +149 76.3% +1.72 8–6 (57%) 15–9 (63%) — -1.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2019 2263 174.5 +6.82 +6.86 1.476 56.3% 0 +80 +290 80.5% +2.00 7–8 (47%) 15–5 (75%) — -0.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2020 2277 174.3 +4.76 +6.66 1.375 55.6% -19 +74 — 81.3% +1.93 6–1 (86%) 11–2 (85%) — -1.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2021 2339 175.3 +5.82 +8.26 1.443 56.3% +2 +113 +292 77.0% +1.99 9–5 (64%) 12–9 (57%) — -2.44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2022 2354 170.3 +7.26 +6.21 1.481 56.1% +24 +57 +322 80.0% +1.83 6–4 (60%) 18–4 (82%) — -0.84 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2023 2402 174.8 +7.28 +6.22 1.422 55.5% +78 +9 +271 82.1% +1.97 11–4 (73%) 31–8 (79%) — -1.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2024 2273 164.2 +4.66 +5.21 1.354 54.9% +76 +122 +363 74.1% +1.59 4–3 (57%) 13–5 (72%) — -0.71 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2025 2192 161.5 +5.25 +3.10 1.297 54.3% +52 +120 +371 72.3% +1.53 5–1 (83%) 11–13 (46%) — -1.44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2026 2095 144.5 +2.72 +1.72 1.124 51.9% +65 +134 +377 61.0% +0.65 4–5 (44%) 5–4 (56%) — -1.84 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2594 180.7 +5.47 +6.81 1.362 55.3% +38 +32 +76 76.2% +1.76 218–88 (71%) 332–174 (66%) 107.4 -1.42 — 2280 170.5 +2.86 +4.34 1.200 53.1% +44 -213 -48 65.6% +1.01 104–74 (58%) 132–106 (55%) 101.1 -0.61

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.