H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:16 UTC
Novak Djokovic vs Daniil Medvedev H2H: 8-5
Novak Djokovic holds a 8–5 lead over Daniil Medvedev in their ATP head-to-head. Across 13 main-draw meetings, Novak Djokovic leads 7–4 on hard courts, while Daniil Medvedev leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Novak Djokovic won the 2023 US Open final 6-3 7-6(5) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Serbia
Age 39
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
8
–
5
13 main draw meetings
Russia
Age 30
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 10, 2023* | US Open | Grand Slam | F | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 6-3 7-6(5) 6-3 | Daniil Medvedev | Match data |
| Mar 4, 2023* | Dubai | ATP 500 | SF | Hard | Daniil Medvedev | 6-4 6-4 | Novak Djokovic | Match data |
| Jan 7, 2023* | Adelaide 1 | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 6-3 6-4 | Daniil Medvedev | Match data |
| Nov 14, 2022 | Tour Finals | ATP Finals | RR | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 6-3 6-7(5) 7-6(2) | Daniil Medvedev | Match data |
| Oct 8, 2022* | Astana | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 4-6 7-6(6) 0-0 (ret.) | Daniil Medvedev | Match data |
| Nov 7, 2021* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | F | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 4-6 6-3 6-3 | Daniil Medvedev | Match data |
| Sep 12, 2021* | US Open | Grand Slam | F | Hard | Daniil Medvedev | 6-4 6-4 6-4 | Novak Djokovic | Match data |
| Feb 21, 2021* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | F | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 7-5 6-2 6-2 | Daniil Medvedev | Match data |
| Nov 16, 2020 | Tour Finals | ATP Finals | RR | Hard | Daniil Medvedev | 6-3 6-3 | Novak Djokovic | Match data |
| Aug 17, 2019* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | SF | Hard | Daniil Medvedev | 3-6 6-3 6-3 | Novak Djokovic | Match data |
| Apr 20, 2019* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | QF | Clay | Daniil Medvedev | 6-3 4-6 6-2 | Novak Djokovic | Match data |
| Jan 22, 2019* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 6-4 6-7(5) 6-2 6-3 | Daniil Medvedev | Match data |
| Jul 1, 2017* | Eastbourne | ATP 250 | SF | Grass | Novak Djokovic | 6-4 6-4 | Daniil Medvedev | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Novak Djokovic | #7 | #1 | 16,950 | 2,593 | 1,122 | 223 | 83.4% | 24 | 40 | 7 | 14 | 15 | 100 |
| Daniil Medvedev | #8 | #1 | 10,780 | 2,285 | 427 | 182 | 70.1% | 1 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 10 | 23 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Novak Djokovic | Daniil Medvedev | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2004 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #186 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2005 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #78 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2006 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #16 | 1,884 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2007 | 65–19 | 77.4% | #3 | 2,067 | 0 | 7 | 2016 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #99 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2008 | 58–15 | 79.5% | #3 | 2,120 | 1 | 11 | 2017 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #65 | 1,739 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2009 | 78–17 | 82.1% | #3 | 2,267 | 1 | 16 | 2018 | 41–23 | 64.1% | #16 | 2,033 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2010 | 56–18 | 75.7% | #3 | 2,166 | 1 | 18 | 2019 | 58–21 | 73.4% | #5 | 2,126 | 0 | 7 |
| 24 | 2011 | 72–6 | 92.3% | #1 | 2,357 | 4 | 28 | 2020 | 24–9 | 72.7% | #4 | 2,177 | 0 | 9 |
| 25 | 2012 | 71–10 | 87.7% | #1 | 2,429 | 5 | 34 | 2021 | 50–12 | 80.6% | #2 | 2,244 | 1 | 13 |
| 26 | 2013 | 67–9 | 88.2% | #2 | 2,469 | 6 | 41 | 2022 | 42–18 | 70.0% | #7 | 2,064 | 1 | 15 |
| 27 | 2014 | 65–8 | 89.0% | #1 | 2,463 | 7 | 48 | 2023 | 67–18 | 78.8% | #3 | 2,160 | 1 | 20 |
| 28 | 2015 | 82–6 | 93.2% | #1 | 2,554 | 10 | 59 | 2024 | 44–18 | 71.0% | #5 | 2,099 | 1 | 20 |
| 29 | 2016 | 64–8 | 88.9% | #2 | 2,450 | 12 | 66 | 2025 | 43–23 | 65.2% | #13 | 1,950 | 1 | 21 |
| 30 | 2017 | 31–8 | 79.5% | #12 | 2,293 | 12 | 68 | 2026 | 31–12 | 72.1% | #8 | 1,936 | 1 | 23 |
| 31 | 2018 | 53–12 | 81.5% | #1 | 2,332 | 14 | 72 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2019 | 55–11 | 83.3% | #2 | 2,264 | 16 | 77 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2020 | 35–5 | 87.5% | #1 | 2,275 | 17 | 81 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2021 | 46–5 | 90.2% | #1 | 2,372 | 20 | 86 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2022 | 42–6 | 87.5% | #5 | 2,368 | 21 | 91 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2023 | 54–6 | 90.0% | #1 | 2,405 | 24 | 98 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2024 | 29–9 | 76.3% | #7 | 2,226 | 24 | 98 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2025 | 39–11 | 78.0% | #4 | 2,174 | 24 | 100 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 2026 | 15–5 | 75.0% | #7 | 2,155 | 24 | 100 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |