Home
/
H2H
/
Novak Djokovic vs David Ferrer
H2H data updated: 2026-10-17 00:00 UTC
Novak Djokovic vs David Ferrer H2H: 16-4
Novak Djokovic holds a 16–4 lead over David Ferrer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 20 main-draw meetings, Novak Djokovic leads 13–2 on hard courts and 3–2 on clay. Most recently, Novak Djokovic won the 2015 China Open semifinal 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups?
Advanced rivalry search
lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Serbia
Age 39
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
16
–
4
20 main-draw meetings
ESP
Age 44
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
Player Score Player Match Data Date Round Tournament Category Surface
Novak Djokovic
#1
6-2 6-3
David Ferrer
#7
Match data
Oct 10, 2015*
SF
China Open
ATP 500
Hard
Novak Djokovic
#1
6-4 6-4
David Ferrer
#8
Match data
May 16, 2015*
SF
Italian Open
Masters 1000
Clay
Novak Djokovic
#1
7-5 7-5
David Ferrer
#7
Match data
Apr 3, 2015*
QF
Miami Open
Masters 1000
Hard
Novak Djokovic
#1
6-4 6-2
David Ferrer
#5
Match data
Oct 11, 2014*
QF
Shanghai Masters
Masters 1000
Hard
Novak Djokovic
#2
7-5 4-6 6-3
David Ferrer
#5
Match data
May 17, 2014*
QF
Italian Open
Masters 1000
Clay
Novak Djokovic
#2
7-5 7-5
David Ferrer
#3
Match data
Nov 3, 2013*
F
Paris Masters
Masters 1000
Hard
Novak Djokovic
#1
6-2 6-2 6-1
David Ferrer
#5
Match data
Jan 26, 2013*
SF
Australian Open
Grand Slam
Hard
Novak Djokovic
#2
2-6 6-1 6-4 6-2
David Ferrer
#5
Match data
Sep 8, 2012*
SF
US Open
Grand Slam
Hard
Novak Djokovic
#1
6-2 7-6(1)
David Ferrer
#5
Match data
Mar 30, 2012*
QF
Miami Open
Masters 1000
Hard
Novak Djokovic
#1
6-4 7-6(4) 6-1
David Ferrer
#5
Match data
Jan 26, 2012*
QF
Australian Open
Grand Slam
Hard
David Ferrer
#5
6-3 6-1
Novak Djokovic
#1
Match data
Nov 20, 2011
RR
ATP Finals
ATP Finals
Hard
Novak Djokovic
#2
6-4 4-6 6-3
David Ferrer
#6
Match data
May 7, 2011*
QF
Madrid Open
Masters 1000
Clay
Novak Djokovic
#2
6-2 6-4
David Ferrer
#11
Match data
Oct 10, 2010*
F
China Open
ATP 500
Hard
Novak Djokovic
#3
7-5 6-3
David Ferrer
#14
Match data
Mar 1, 2009*
F
Dubai Tennis Championships
ATP 500
Hard
Novak Djokovic
#3
6-0 6-3 7-5
David Ferrer
#5
Match data
Jan 24, 2008*
QF
Australian Open
Grand Slam
Hard
David Ferrer
#6
6-4 6-4
Novak Djokovic
#3
Match data
Nov 12, 2007
RR
ATP Finals
ATP Finals
Hard
Novak Djokovic
#3
6-4 6-4 6-3
David Ferrer
#15
Match data
Sep 8, 2007*
SF
US Open
Grand Slam
Hard
David Ferrer
#16
7-5 6-4
Novak Djokovic
#7
Match data
Apr 20, 2007*
R16
Monte-Carlo Masters
Masters 1000
Clay
Novak Djokovic
#13
6-3 6-4
David Ferrer
#15
Match data
Mar 15, 2007*
QF
Indian Wells Open
Masters 1000
Hard
David Ferrer
#54
4-6 6-4 6-4
Novak Djokovic
#272
Match data
Sep 17, 2004*
R16
Tiriac Open
International Series
→
modern equivalent
ATP 250
Clay
*
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category.
Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories.
Mapping details.
Career Comparison
Player
Current
Peak
Pts
Elo
W
L
Win %
GS
Olympics
1000* including documented historical predecessor categories
Finals
500* including documented historical predecessor categories
250* including documented historical predecessor categories
Titles
Novak Djokovic
#8
#1
16,950
2,593
1,146
232
83.2%
24
1
40
7
16
14
102
David Ferrer
#224
#3
7,220
2,263
703
371
65.5%
0
0
1
0
10
16
27
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
Yr W-L Win % Rank Elo GS Titles
Yr W-L Win % Rank Elo GS Titles
17
2004
1–3
25.0%
#186
1,490
0
0
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
18
2005
9–9
50.0%
#78
1,733
0
0
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
19
2006
35–17
67.3%
#16
1,884
0
2
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
20
2007
65–19
77.4%
#3
2,068
0
7
2002
10–6
62.5%
#59
1,610
0
1
21
2008
63–16
79.7%
#3
2,130
1
11
2003
20–27
42.6%
#71
1,671
0
1
22
2009
78–17
82.1%
#3
2,273
1
16
2004
29–31
48.3%
#49
1,654
0
1
23
2010
56–18
75.7%
#3
2,163
1
18
2005
41–28
59.4%
#14
1,777
0
1
24
2011
72–6
92.3%
#1
2,382
4
28
2006
37–24
60.7%
#14
1,816
0
2
25
2012
75–12
86.2%
#1
2,425
5
34
2007
57–22
72.2%
#5
2,038
0
5
26
2013
67–9
88.2%
#2
2,471
6
41
2008
40–21
65.6%
#12
1,837
0
7
27
2014
65–8
89.0%
#1
2,450
7
48
2009
40–24
62.5%
#17
1,871
0
7
28
2015
82–6
93.2%
#1
2,554
10
59
2010
58–23
71.6%
#7
2,035
0
9
29
2016
64–9
87.7%
#2
2,429
12
66
2011
55–19
74.3%
#5
2,109
0
11
30
2017
31–8
79.5%
#12
2,281
12
68
2012
70–15
82.4%
#5
2,228
0
18
31
2018
53–12
81.5%
#1
2,332
14
72
2013
63–24
72.4%
#3
2,092
0
20
32
2019
55–11
83.3%
#2
2,262
16
77
2014
55–24
69.6%
#10
2,060
0
21
33
2020
35–5
87.5%
#1
2,277
17
81
2015
53–16
76.8%
#7
2,127
0
26
34
2021
50–7
87.7%
#1
2,339
20
86
2016
34–23
59.6%
#21
1,961
0
26
35
2022
42–6
87.5%
#5
2,353
21
91
2017
25–21
54.3%
#37
1,907
0
27
36
2023
54–6
90.0%
#1
2,402
24
98
2018
8–17
32.0%
#125
1,708
0
27
37
2024
35–9
79.5%
#7
2,273
24
99
2019
8–6
57.1%
#224
1,803
0
27
38
2025
39–11
78.0%
#4
2,191
24
101
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
39
2026
20–8
71.4%
#8
2,114
24
102
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year.
Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
Yr
Yr
W
L
M
Win %
W
L
M
Win %
W
L
M
Win %
W
L
M
Win %
W
L
M
Win %
W
L
M
Win %
W
L
M
Win %
W
L
M
Win %
17
2004
0
1
1
0.0%
1
2
3
33.3%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
18
2005
2
3
5
40.0%
2
3
5
40.0%
2
1
3
66.7%
3
2
5
60.0%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
19
2006
14
8
22
63.6%
14
5
19
73.7%
4
2
6
66.7%
3
2
5
60.0%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
20
2007
43
12
55
78.2%
16
5
21
76.2%
6
2
8
75.0%
—
—
—
—
2002
0
1
1
0.0%
10
4
14
71.4%
—
—
—
—
0
1
1
0.0%
21
2008
42
11
53
79.2%
16
3
19
84.2%
5
2
7
71.4%
—
—
—
—
2003
6
10
16
37.5%
13
16
29
44.8%
1
1
2
50.0%
—
—
—
—
22
2009
53
11
64
82.8%
17
4
21
81.0%
8
2
10
80.0%
—
—
—
—
2004
3
10
13
23.1%
22
15
37
59.5%
1
3
4
25.0%
3
3
6
50.0%
23
2010
40
12
52
76.9%
10
4
14
71.4%
6
2
8
75.0%
—
—
—
—
2005
16
11
27
59.3%
23
14
37
62.2%
0
1
1
0.0%
2
2
4
50.0%
24
2011
46
5
51
90.2%
19
1
20
95.0%
7
0
7
100.0%
—
—
—
—
2006
17
13
30
56.7%
15
7
22
68.2%
3
1
4
75.0%
2
3
5
40.0%
25
2012
50
5
55
90.9%
16
4
20
80.0%
9
3
12
75.0%
—
—
—
—
2007
37
14
51
72.5%
19
7
26
73.1%
1
1
2
50.0%
—
—
—
—
26
2013
49
5
54
90.7%
12
3
15
80.0%
6
1
7
85.7%
—
—
—
—
2008
15
14
29
51.7%
18
6
24
75.0%
7
1
8
87.5%
—
—
—
—
27
2014
44
6
50
88.0%
14
2
16
87.5%
7
0
7
100.0%
—
—
—
—
2009
22
14
36
61.1%
14
8
22
63.6%
4
2
6
66.7%
—
—
—
—
28
2015
59
5
64
92.2%
16
1
17
94.1%
7
0
7
100.0%
—
—
—
—
2010
26
15
41
63.4%
29
7
36
80.6%
3
1
4
75.0%
—
—
—
—
29
2016
46
6
52
88.5%
16
2
18
88.9%
2
1
3
66.7%
—
—
—
—
2011
30
12
42
71.4%
22
6
28
78.6%
3
1
4
75.0%
—
—
—
—
30
2017
10
3
13
76.9%
13
4
17
76.5%
8
1
9
88.9%
—
—
—
—
2012
31
8
39
79.5%
28
5
33
84.8%
11
2
13
84.6%
—
—
—
—
31
2018
31
6
37
83.8%
11
5
16
68.8%
11
1
12
91.7%
—
—
—
—
2013
37
16
53
69.8%
22
6
28
78.6%
4
2
6
66.7%
—
—
—
—
32
2019
32
8
40
80.0%
16
3
19
84.2%
7
0
7
100.0%
—
—
—
—
2014
29
15
44
65.9%
25
8
33
75.8%
1
1
2
50.0%
—
—
—
—
33
2020
24
4
28
85.7%
11
1
12
91.7%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
2015
34
10
44
77.3%
19
5
24
79.2%
0
1
1
0.0%
—
—
—
—
34
2021
25
4
29
86.2%
18
3
21
85.7%
7
0
7
100.0%
—
—
—
—
2016
17
13
30
56.7%
15
7
22
68.2%
2
3
5
40.0%
—
—
—
—
35
2022
20
2
22
90.9%
15
4
19
78.9%
7
0
7
100.0%
—
—
—
—
2017
11
10
21
52.4%
12
8
20
60.0%
2
3
5
40.0%
—
—
—
—
36
2023
36
2
38
94.7%
12
3
15
80.0%
6
1
7
85.7%
—
—
—
—
2018
6
10
16
37.5%
1
5
6
16.7%
1
2
3
33.3%
—
—
—
—
37
2024
13
4
17
76.5%
16
4
20
80.0%
6
1
7
85.7%
—
—
—
—
2019
4
3
7
57.1%
4
3
7
57.1%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
38
2025
25
7
32
78.1%
9
3
12
75.0%
5
1
6
83.3%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
39
2026
13
5
18
72.2%
2
2
4
50.0%
5
1
6
83.3%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Career
—
717
135
852
84.2%
292
71
363
80.4%
131
22
153
85.6%
6
4
10
60.0%
—
341
199
540
63.1%
311
137
448
69.4%
44
26
70
62.9%
7
9
16
43.8%
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.