H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC
Novak Djokovic vs David Ferrer H2H: 16-4
Novak Djokovic holds a 16–4 lead over David Ferrer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 20 main-draw meetings, Novak Djokovic leads 13–2 on hard courts and 3–2 on clay. Most recently, Novak Djokovic won the 2015 Beijing semifinal 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Serbia
Age 39
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
16
–
4
20 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 44
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 10, 2015* | Beijing | ATP 500 | SF | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 6-2 6-3 | David Ferrer | Match data |
| May 16, 2015* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | SF | Clay | Novak Djokovic | 6-4 6-4 | David Ferrer | Match data |
| Apr 3, 2015* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | QF | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 7-5 7-5 | David Ferrer | Match data |
| Oct 11, 2014* | Shanghai Masters | Masters 1000 | QF | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 6-4 6-2 | David Ferrer | Match data |
| May 17, 2014* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | QF | Clay | Novak Djokovic | 7-5 4-6 6-3 | David Ferrer | Match data |
| Nov 3, 2013* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | F | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 7-5 7-5 | David Ferrer | Match data |
| Jan 26, 2013* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | SF | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 6-2 6-2 6-1 | David Ferrer | Match data |
| Sep 8, 2012* | US Open | Grand Slam | SF | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 2-6 6-1 6-4 6-2 | David Ferrer | Match data |
| Mar 30, 2012* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | QF | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 6-2 7-6(1) | David Ferrer | Match data |
| Jan 26, 2012* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | QF | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 6-4 7-6(4) 6-1 | David Ferrer | Match data |
| Nov 20, 2011 | Tour Finals | ATP Finals | RR | Hard | David Ferrer | 6-3 6-1 | Novak Djokovic | Match data |
| May 7, 2011* | Madrid Masters | Masters 1000 | QF | Clay | Novak Djokovic | 6-4 4-6 6-3 | David Ferrer | Match data |
| Oct 10, 2010* | Beijing | ATP 500 | F | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 6-2 6-4 | David Ferrer | Match data |
| Mar 1, 2009* | Dubai | ATP 500 | F | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 7-5 6-3 | David Ferrer | Match data |
| Jan 24, 2008* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | QF | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 6-0 6-3 7-5 | David Ferrer | Match data |
| Nov 12, 2007 | Masters Cup | ATP Finals | RR | Hard | David Ferrer | 6-4 6-4 | Novak Djokovic | Match data |
| Sep 8, 2007* | US Open | Grand Slam | SF | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 6-4 6-4 6-3 | David Ferrer | Match data |
| Apr 20, 2007* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Clay | David Ferrer | 7-5 6-4 | Novak Djokovic | Match data |
| Mar 15, 2007* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | QF | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 6-3 6-4 | David Ferrer | Match data |
| Sep 17, 2004* | Bucharest | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | David Ferrer | 4-6 6-4 6-4 | Novak Djokovic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Novak Djokovic | #7 | #1 | 16,950 | 2,593 | 1,122 | 223 | 83.4% | 24 | 40 | 7 | 14 | 15 | 100 |
| David Ferrer | #224 | #3 | 7,220 | 2,270 | 700 | 368 | 65.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 19 | 27 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Novak Djokovic | David Ferrer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2004 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #186 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2005 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #78 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2006 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #16 | 1,884 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2007 | 65–19 | 77.4% | #3 | 2,067 | 0 | 7 | 2002 | 10–6 | 62.5% | #59 | 1,610 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2008 | 58–15 | 79.5% | #3 | 2,120 | 1 | 11 | 2003 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #71 | 1,672 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2009 | 78–17 | 82.1% | #3 | 2,267 | 1 | 16 | 2004 | 29–31 | 48.3% | #49 | 1,651 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2010 | 56–18 | 75.7% | #3 | 2,166 | 1 | 18 | 2005 | 41–28 | 59.4% | #14 | 1,776 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2011 | 72–6 | 92.3% | #1 | 2,357 | 4 | 28 | 2006 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #14 | 1,815 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2012 | 71–10 | 87.7% | #1 | 2,429 | 5 | 34 | 2007 | 57–22 | 72.2% | #5 | 2,036 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2013 | 67–9 | 88.2% | #2 | 2,469 | 6 | 41 | 2008 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #12 | 1,856 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | 2014 | 65–8 | 89.0% | #1 | 2,463 | 7 | 48 | 2009 | 40–24 | 62.5% | #17 | 1,853 | 0 | 7 |
| 28 | 2015 | 82–6 | 93.2% | #1 | 2,554 | 10 | 59 | 2010 | 58–23 | 71.6% | #7 | 2,033 | 0 | 9 |
| 29 | 2016 | 64–8 | 88.9% | #2 | 2,450 | 12 | 66 | 2011 | 55–19 | 74.3% | #5 | 2,108 | 0 | 11 |
| 30 | 2017 | 31–8 | 79.5% | #12 | 2,293 | 12 | 68 | 2012 | 68–14 | 82.9% | #5 | 2,241 | 0 | 18 |
| 31 | 2018 | 53–12 | 81.5% | #1 | 2,332 | 14 | 72 | 2013 | 63–24 | 72.4% | #3 | 2,100 | 0 | 20 |
| 32 | 2019 | 55–11 | 83.3% | #2 | 2,264 | 16 | 77 | 2014 | 55–24 | 69.6% | #10 | 2,065 | 0 | 21 |
| 33 | 2020 | 35–5 | 87.5% | #1 | 2,275 | 17 | 81 | 2015 | 53–16 | 76.8% | #7 | 2,126 | 0 | 26 |
| 34 | 2021 | 46–5 | 90.2% | #1 | 2,372 | 20 | 86 | 2016 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #21 | 1,966 | 0 | 26 |
| 35 | 2022 | 42–6 | 87.5% | #5 | 2,368 | 21 | 91 | 2017 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #37 | 1,914 | 0 | 27 |
| 36 | 2023 | 54–6 | 90.0% | #1 | 2,405 | 24 | 98 | 2018 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #125 | 1,710 | 0 | 27 |
| 37 | 2024 | 29–9 | 76.3% | #7 | 2,226 | 24 | 98 | 2019 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #224 | 1,804 | 0 | 27 |
| 38 | 2025 | 39–11 | 78.0% | #4 | 2,174 | 24 | 100 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 2026 | 15–5 | 75.0% | #7 | 2,155 | 24 | 100 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |