H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Novak Djokovic vs Fabio Fognini H2H: 8-0

Novak Djokovic holds a 8–0 lead over Fabio Fognini in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Novak Djokovic leads 5–0 on hard courts and 3–0 on clay. Most recently, Novak Djokovic won the 2016 Shanghai Masters third round 6-3 6-3.

Serbia Age 39 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
8 0
8 main draw meetings
ITA Age 39 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 12, 2016* Shanghai Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Novak Djokovic #1 6-3 6-3 Fabio Fognini #50 Match data
Jan 21, 2014* Australian Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Novak Djokovic #2 6-3 6-0 6-2 Fabio Fognini #16 Match data
Oct 11, 2013* Shanghai Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Novak Djokovic #2 6-3 6-3 Fabio Fognini #17 Match data
Apr 20, 2013* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 SF Clay Novak Djokovic #1 6-2 6-1 Fabio Fognini #32 Match data
Mar 10, 2013* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Novak Djokovic #1 6-0 5-7 6-2 Fabio Fognini #36 Match data
Jun 2, 2011* Roland Garros Grand Slam QF Clay Novak Djokovic #2 (w/o) Fabio Fognini #49 Match data
May 7, 2010* Belgrade ATP 250 R16 Clay Novak Djokovic #2 6-4 6-4 Fabio Fognini #80 Match data
Oct 14, 2009* Shanghai Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Novak Djokovic #4 6-3 6-1 Fabio Fognini #66 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Novak Djokovic #7 #1 16,950 2,593 1,122 223 83.4% 24 40 7 14 15 100
Fabio Fognini #188 #9 2,920 2,033 398 382 51.0% 0 1 0 1 7 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Novak Djokovic Fabio Fognini
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2004 1–3 25.0% #186 1,490 0 0
18 2005 9–9 50.0% #78 1,732 0 0 2005 0–1 0.0% #305 1,482 0 0
19 2006 35–17 67.3% #16 1,884 0 2 2006 2–5 28.6% #247 1,476 0 0
20 2007 65–19 77.4% #3 2,067 0 7 2007 5–7 41.7% #95 1,600 0 0
21 2008 58–15 79.5% #3 2,120 1 11 2008 16–17 48.5% #88 1,612 0 0
22 2009 78–17 82.1% #3 2,267 1 16 2009 17–26 39.5% #54 1,716 0 0
23 2010 56–18 75.7% #3 2,166 1 18 2010 14–25 35.9% #55 1,702 0 0
24 2011 72–6 92.3% #1 2,357 4 28 2011 22–28 44.0% #48 1,725 0 0
25 2012 71–10 87.7% #1 2,429 5 34 2012 21–23 47.7% #45 1,763 0 0
26 2013 67–9 88.2% #2 2,469 6 41 2013 41–26 61.2% #16 1,932 0 2
27 2014 65–8 89.0% #1 2,463 7 48 2014 36–24 60.0% #20 1,823 0 3
28 2015 82–6 93.2% #1 2,554 10 59 2015 30–25 54.5% #21 1,908 0 3
29 2016 64–8 88.9% #2 2,450 12 66 2016 23–21 52.3% #49 1,864 0 4
30 2017 31–8 79.5% #12 2,293 12 68 2017 35–23 60.3% #27 1,945 0 5
31 2018 53–12 81.5% #1 2,332 14 72 2018 44–22 66.7% #13 1,949 0 8
32 2019 55–11 83.3% #2 2,264 16 77 2019 30–22 57.7% #12 1,911 0 9
33 2020 35–5 87.5% #1 2,275 17 81 2020 4–8 33.3% #17 1,800 0 9
34 2021 46–5 90.2% #1 2,372 20 86 2021 18–21 46.2% #37 1,766 0 9
35 2022 42–6 87.5% #5 2,368 21 91 2022 19–24 44.2% #55 1,700 0 9
36 2023 54–6 90.0% #1 2,405 24 98 2023 9–13 40.9% #107 1,690 0 9
37 2024 29–9 76.3% #7 2,226 24 98 2024 12–14 46.2% #91 1,675 0 9
38 2025 39–11 78.0% #4 2,174 24 100 2025 0–7 0.0% #188 1,577 0 9
39 2026 15–5 75.0% #7 2,155 24 100