H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Novak Djokovic vs Feliciano Lopez H2H: 9-1
Novak Djokovic holds a 9–1 lead over Feliciano Lopez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 10 main-draw meetings, Novak Djokovic leads 7–1 on hard courts and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Novak Djokovic won the 2017 Madrid Masters fourth round 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Serbia
Age 39
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
9
–
1
10 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 44
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 2017* | Madrid Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Clay | Novak Djokovic | 6-4 7-5 | Feliciano Lopez | Match data |
| Mar 17, 2016* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 6-3 6-3 | Feliciano Lopez | Match data |
| Feb 26, 2016* | Dubai | ATP 500 | QF | Hard | Feliciano Lopez | 6-3 0-0 (ret.) | Novak Djokovic | Match data |
| Oct 16, 2015* | Shanghai Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 6-2 6-3 | Feliciano Lopez | Match data |
| Sep 10, 2015* | US Open | Grand Slam | QF | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 6-1 3-6 6-3 7-6(2) | Feliciano Lopez | Match data |
| Oct 12, 2012* | Shanghai Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 6-3 6-3 | Feliciano Lopez | Match data |
| May 1, 2011* | Belgrade | ATP 250 | F | Clay | Novak Djokovic | 7-6(4) 6-2 | Feliciano Lopez | Match data |
| Feb 24, 2011* | Dubai | ATP 500 | R16 | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 6-3 2-6 6-4 | Feliciano Lopez | Match data |
| Mar 27, 2007* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 6-0 6-3 | Feliciano Lopez | Match data |
| Jan 18, 2007* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 6-2 7-5 6-1 | Feliciano Lopez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Novak Djokovic | #7 | #1 | 16,950 | 2,593 | 1,122 | 223 | 83.4% | 24 | 40 | 7 | 14 | 15 | 100 |
| Feliciano Lopez | #672 | #12 | 2,415 | 2,013 | 497 | 477 | 51.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Novak Djokovic | Feliciano Lopez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #546 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2004 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #186 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2005 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #78 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #271 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2006 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #16 | 1,884 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #159 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2007 | 65–19 | 77.4% | #3 | 2,067 | 0 | 7 | 2002 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #62 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2008 | 58–15 | 79.5% | #3 | 2,120 | 1 | 11 | 2003 | 34–31 | 52.3% | #28 | 1,841 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2009 | 78–17 | 82.1% | #3 | 2,267 | 1 | 16 | 2004 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #25 | 1,833 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2010 | 56–18 | 75.7% | #3 | 2,166 | 1 | 18 | 2005 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #33 | 1,759 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2011 | 72–6 | 92.3% | #1 | 2,357 | 4 | 28 | 2006 | 19–28 | 40.4% | #79 | 1,676 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2012 | 71–10 | 87.7% | #1 | 2,429 | 5 | 34 | 2007 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #35 | 1,804 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2013 | 67–9 | 88.2% | #2 | 2,469 | 6 | 41 | 2008 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #30 | 1,829 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2014 | 65–8 | 89.0% | #1 | 2,463 | 7 | 48 | 2009 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #47 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2015 | 82–6 | 93.2% | #1 | 2,554 | 10 | 59 | 2010 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #32 | 1,807 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2016 | 64–8 | 88.9% | #2 | 2,450 | 12 | 66 | 2011 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #20 | 1,968 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2017 | 31–8 | 79.5% | #12 | 2,293 | 12 | 68 | 2012 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #40 | 1,844 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2018 | 53–12 | 81.5% | #1 | 2,332 | 14 | 72 | 2013 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #28 | 1,914 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 2019 | 55–11 | 83.3% | #2 | 2,264 | 16 | 77 | 2014 | 40–25 | 61.5% | #14 | 1,950 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | 2020 | 35–5 | 87.5% | #1 | 2,275 | 17 | 81 | 2015 | 32–26 | 55.2% | #17 | 1,943 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | 2021 | 46–5 | 90.2% | #1 | 2,372 | 20 | 86 | 2016 | 29–24 | 54.7% | #28 | 1,890 | 0 | 5 |
| 35 | 2022 | 42–6 | 87.5% | #5 | 2,368 | 21 | 91 | 2017 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #36 | 1,900 | 0 | 6 |
| 36 | 2023 | 54–6 | 90.0% | #1 | 2,405 | 24 | 98 | 2018 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #64 | 1,817 | 0 | 6 |
| 37 | 2024 | 29–9 | 76.3% | #7 | 2,226 | 24 | 98 | 2019 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #62 | 1,824 | 0 | 7 |
| 38 | 2025 | 39–11 | 78.0% | #4 | 2,174 | 24 | 100 | 2020 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #64 | 1,763 | 0 | 7 |
| 39 | 2026 | 15–5 | 75.0% | #7 | 2,155 | 24 | 100 | 2021 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #106 | 1,595 | 0 | 7 |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 0–11 | 0.0% | #830 | 1,468 | 0 | 7 |
| 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #468 | 1,517 | 0 | 7 |