H2H data updated: 2026-09-08 00:00 UTC

Novak Djokovic vs Felix Auger-Aliassime H2H: 2-0

Novak Djokovic holds a 2–0 lead over Felix Auger-Aliassime in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Novak Djokovic leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Novak Djokovic won the 2026 Wimbledon quarterfinal 7-6(10) 3-6 6-3 6-7(4) 7-6(4).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Novak Djokovic
Serbia Age 39 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Felix Auger-Aliassime
Canada Age 26 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Novak Djokovic #8 7-6(10) 3-6 6-3 6-7(4) 7-6(4) Felix Auger-Aliassime #4 Match data Jul 7, 2026 QF Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Novak Djokovic #1 7-5 7-6(1) Felix Auger-Aliassime #9 Match data May 14, 2022* QF Italian Open Masters 1000 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS Olympics 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Novak Djokovic #5 #1 16,950 2,593 1,141 231 83.2% 24 1 40 7 15 14 101
Felix Auger-Aliassime #4 #4 4,740 2,097 284 176 61.7% 0 0 0 0 3 6 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Novak Djokovic Felix Auger-Aliassime
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2004 1–3 25.0% #186 1,490 0 0 2018 6–10 37.5% #108 1,606 0 0
18 2005 9–9 50.0% #78 1,733 0 0 2019 33–21 61.1% #21 1,850 0 0
19 2006 35–17 67.3% #16 1,884 0 2 2020 22–16 57.9% #21 1,856 0 0
20 2007 65–19 77.4% #3 2,068 0 7 2021 38–23 62.3% #11 1,971 0 0
21 2008 63–16 79.7% #3 2,130 1 11 2022 51–23 68.9% #6 2,050 0 4
22 2009 78–17 82.1% #3 2,273 1 16 2023 22–20 52.4% #29 1,869 0 5
23 2010 56–18 75.7% #3 2,163 1 18 2024 30–25 54.5% #29 1,813 0 5
24 2011 72–6 92.3% #1 2,382 4 28 2025 50–23 68.5% #5 2,035 0 8
25 2012 75–12 86.2% #1 2,425 5 34 2026 32–15 68.1% #4 1,954 0 9
26 2013 67–9 88.2% #2 2,471 6 41 — — — — — — —
27 2014 65–8 89.0% #1 2,450 7 48 — — — — — — —
28 2015 82–6 93.2% #1 2,554 10 59 — — — — — — —
29 2016 64–9 87.7% #2 2,429 12 66 — — — — — — —
30 2017 31–8 79.5% #12 2,281 12 68 — — — — — — —
31 2018 53–12 81.5% #1 2,332 14 72 — — — — — — —
32 2019 55–11 83.3% #2 2,262 16 77 — — — — — — —
33 2020 35–5 87.5% #1 2,277 17 81 — — — — — — —
34 2021 50–7 87.7% #1 2,339 20 86 — — — — — — —
35 2022 42–6 87.5% #5 2,353 21 91 — — — — — — —
36 2023 54–6 90.0% #1 2,402 24 98 — — — — — — —
37 2024 35–9 79.5% #7 2,273 24 99 — — — — — — —
38 2025 39–11 78.0% #4 2,191 24 101 — — — — — — —
39 2026 15–7 68.2% #5 2,094 24 101 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Novak Djokovic Felix Auger-Aliassime
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2004 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2018 4 7 11 36.4% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — —
18 2005 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 2019 12 10 22 54.5% 12 8 20 60.0% 9 3 12 75.0% — — — —
19 2006 14 8 22 63.6% 14 5 19 73.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 2020 21 13 34 61.8% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2007 43 12 55 78.2% 16 5 21 76.2% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2021 24 14 38 63.2% 4 6 10 40.0% 10 3 13 76.9% — — — —
21 2008 42 11 53 79.2% 16 3 19 84.2% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2022 36 12 48 75.0% 11 7 18 61.1% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — —
22 2009 53 11 64 82.8% 17 4 21 81.0% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — — 2023 21 15 36 58.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 2010 40 12 52 76.9% 10 4 14 71.4% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2024 12 15 27 44.4% 18 8 26 69.2% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
24 2011 46 5 51 90.2% 19 1 20 95.0% 7 0 7 100.0% — — — — 2025 41 14 55 74.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — —
25 2012 50 5 55 90.9% 16 4 20 80.0% 9 3 12 75.0% — — — — 2026 17 7 24 70.8% 8 5 13 61.5% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — —
26 2013 49 5 54 90.7% 12 3 15 80.0% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2014 44 6 50 88.0% 14 2 16 87.5% 7 0 7 100.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2015 59 5 64 92.2% 16 1 17 94.1% 7 0 7 100.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2016 46 6 52 88.5% 16 2 18 88.9% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2017 10 3 13 76.9% 13 4 17 76.5% 8 1 9 88.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2018 31 6 37 83.8% 11 5 16 68.8% 11 1 12 91.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2019 32 8 40 80.0% 16 3 19 84.2% 7 0 7 100.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2020 24 4 28 85.7% 11 1 12 91.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2021 25 4 29 86.2% 18 3 21 85.7% 7 0 7 100.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2022 20 2 22 90.9% 15 4 19 78.9% 7 0 7 100.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2023 36 2 38 94.7% 12 3 15 80.0% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2024 13 4 17 76.5% 16 4 20 80.0% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2025 25 7 32 78.1% 9 3 12 75.0% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2026 8 4 12 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 712 134 846 84.2% 292 71 363 80.4% 131 22 153 85.6% 6 4 10 60.0% — 188 107 295 63.7% 60 49 109 55.0% 36 20 56 64.3% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 1,324/1,372 of Novak Djokovic's and 445/461 of Felix Auger-Aliassime's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Novak Djokovic Felix Auger-Aliassime
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2004 4/4 6.5 5.3 62.5% 59.7% 42.5% 44.3% 38.4% 53.1% 41.5% 2018 16/16 6.3 4.4 60.6% 68.5% 51.1% 59.8% 37.0% 61.9% 37.0%
18 2005 18/18 4.9 3.2 63.1% 69.1% 48.2% 60.2% 44.6% 61.2% 37.8% 2019 53/54 9.0 4.7 65.4% 74.7% 48.4% 62.2% 46.6% 65.5% 35.1%
19 2006 52/52 5.5 3.0 63.0% 72.3% 53.1% 59.7% 49.3% 65.1% 40.0% 2020 38/38 8.8 4.3 63.5% 74.8% 51.5% 64.5% 35.7% 66.6% 36.5%
20 2007 83/84 6.2 2.3 64.2% 73.1% 54.5% 64.7% 44.4% 66.4% 41.0% 2021 60/61 9.2 4.2 62.9% 77.3% 51.2% 54.4% 43.0% 67.5% 37.4%
21 2008 73/79 6.3 2.0 64.7% 74.2% 58.0% 67.4% 50.9% 68.6% 42.6% 2022 74/74 11.2 3.4 65.0% 77.9% 51.5% 63.2% 40.4% 68.5% 38.1%
22 2009 95/95 5.3 2.8 63.1% 73.3% 54.3% 63.6% 43.6% 66.3% 42.5% 2023 41/42 9.1 4.9 60.2% 77.9% 48.0% 60.0% 36.2% 66.3% 34.8%
23 2010 72/74 4.2 3.9 64.0% 71.6% 54.0% 65.8% 48.0% 65.2% 42.4% 2024 48/55 8.1 4.3 62.1% 75.8% 51.8% 62.1% 42.2% 66.6% 36.8%
24 2011 75/78 4.6 1.9 65.5% 74.8% 57.2% 63.6% 51.1% 68.6% 46.2% 2025 68/73 10.5 3.3 66.6% 77.8% 52.9% 60.9% 35.5% 69.4% 36.2%
25 2012 81/87 5.6 1.8 64.5% 75.7% 56.9% 65.1% 50.8% 69.1% 44.0% 2026 47/48 10.8 2.9 67.3% 78.6% 52.7% 59.9% 43.3% 70.0% 36.1%
26 2013 76/76 6.3 1.6 65.8% 76.3% 62.2% 64.6% 45.0% 71.3% 44.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2014 69/73 6.2 1.5 67.0% 75.5% 57.5% 60.3% 47.7% 69.6% 44.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2015 87/88 5.4 1.6 66.7% 75.4% 61.4% 62.8% 48.1% 70.7% 44.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2016 71/73 3.8 2.4 64.8% 75.0% 57.4% 62.1% 49.2% 68.6% 44.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2017 38/39 4.1 1.9 66.8% 73.4% 53.8% 61.4% 47.9% 66.8% 41.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2018 65/65 5.3 2.3 66.4% 75.5% 58.1% 64.1% 45.1% 69.7% 42.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2019 65/66 5.7 2.6 66.1% 77.4% 59.4% 63.1% 53.6% 71.3% 42.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2020 40/40 6.1 2.8 64.1% 75.9% 53.8% 64.3% 43.4% 67.9% 44.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2021 50/57 8.3 2.7 64.8% 76.7% 54.6% 59.4% 48.3% 68.9% 44.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2022 47/48 6.0 1.9 65.8% 78.5% 58.2% 59.4% 46.9% 71.7% 41.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2023 60/60 7.2 2.9 63.5% 78.0% 57.9% 60.8% 45.3% 70.7% 41.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2024 36/44 7.3 2.7 63.8% 76.0% 56.7% 61.5% 43.5% 69.1% 41.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2025 46/50 8.2 2.1 67.2% 76.8% 55.8% 53.0% 47.1% 69.9% 39.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
39 2026 21/22 8.8 3.5 68.2% 74.6% 54.0% 64.4% 39.0% 67.8% 36.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1,324/1,372 5.8 2.3 65.1% 75.0% 56.7% 62.7% 47.4% 68.6% 42.8% — 445/461 9.6 3.9 64.2% 76.7% 51.1% 60.8% 40.3% 67.5% 36.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Novak Djokovic Felix Auger-Aliassime
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1489 101.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1496 107.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2004 1491 107.5 -0.98 -0.85 0.885 47.7% — +57 — 36.4% -0.91 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — +0.01 2018 1607 125.7 -0.91 +0.36 0.971 49.5% +9 -49 — 47.4% -0.24 2–6 (25%) 5–2 (71%) 100.7 +0.96
18 2005 1733 128.8 -0.13 +0.84 0.974 49.7% -92 -124 -27 51.0% -0.14 2–2 (50%) 8–2 (80%) 106.4 -0.77 2019 1851 153.2 +1.05 +0.29 1.018 50.5% -61 -75 -62 55.2% +0.14 10–7 (59%) 19–9 (68%) 113.4 +0.28
19 2006 1885 144.3 +2.58 +1.86 1.145 52.6% -115 -18 -101 63.6% +0.85 10–6 (63%) 14–5 (74%) 113.5 +0.06 2020 1856 156.8 +2.50 +0.03 1.091 51.4% +26 -150 — 55.3% +0.39 6–4 (60%) 14–9 (61%) 104.1 +0.03
20 2007 2069 168.7 +4.20 +4.63 1.219 53.6% -9 -83 -156 70.3% +1.30 18–6 (75%) 28–13 (68%) 114.0 -0.04 2021 1971 158.3 +3.83 +1.61 1.149 52.0% -26 -258 +17 57.8% +0.51 10–6 (63%) 14–12 (54%) 105.6 -0.33
21 2008 2130 172.3 +5.71 +7.08 1.355 55.3% +34 +15 -166 75.3% +1.68 8–6 (57%) 18–12 (60%) 99.3 -1.51 2022 2050 167.2 +5.11 +2.30 1.211 52.9% +39 -163 -141 64.2% +0.87 13–9 (59%) 27–20 (57%) 105.1 +1.47
22 2009 2274 175.6 +3.72 +6.70 1.260 54.2% +35 -48 -230 74.9% +1.62 18–4 (82%) 19–15 (56%) 109.4 +2.04 2023 1869 149.2 +2.15 -0.90 1.032 50.5% +60 -54 — 50.5% +0.15 7–3 (70%) 15–14 (52%) 99.7 +2.16
23 2010 2163 172.7 +2.60 +6.48 1.220 53.7% +62 0 -55 71.1% +1.38 9–7 (56%) 11–8 (58%) 96.1 +0.94 2024 1814 152.2 +2.11 +1.03 1.100 51.5% -49 +146 — 53.4% +0.47 6–10 (38%) 9–13 (41%) 91.2 +0.26
24 2011 2383 182.8 +6.53 +9.98 1.473 57.2% +13 -31 -72 82.9% +2.35 14–2 (88%) 8–7 (53%) 103.4 -1.11 2025 2036 158.9 +4.52 +1.48 1.186 52.1% +23 -186 -218 62.1% +0.53 19–6 (76%) 32–14 (70%) 115.9 +2.60
25 2012 2426 182.4 +6.77 +8.20 1.427 56.2% +70 -20 -80 77.8% +2.07 16–3 (84%) 17–12 (59%) 104.7 -2.53 2026 1955 152.2 +4.51 +0.73 1.201 52.6% +21 -53 -47 64.0% +0.94 7–4 (64%) 16–13 (55%) 101.6 +0.49
26 2013 2471 184.6 +8.33 +8.48 1.555 57.0% +86 -60 -72 79.4% +2.09 15–6 (71%) 19–9 (68%) 102.2 -1.97 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2014 2451 184.1 +6.63 +9.04 1.457 56.5% +45 +29 +72 78.4% +2.05 15–2 (88%) 13–10 (57%) 103.8 -1.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2015 2554 186.4 +7.05 +9.59 1.509 56.9% +60 +29 +50 83.8% +2.33 16–2 (89%) 17–9 (65%) 106.0 +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2016 2430 183.4 +5.55 +8.54 1.418 56.0% +83 +151 +115 81.8% +2.05 8–1 (89%) 19–7 (73%) 103.4 -0.65 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2017 2281 169.1 +3.30 +4.52 1.236 53.9% +127 +161 +137 73.4% +1.50 8–2 (80%) 10–5 (67%) 100.1 -0.74 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2018 2333 175.5 +5.76 +7.04 1.406 55.3% +44 +2 +149 76.3% +1.72 8–6 (57%) 15–9 (63%) 95.3 -1.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2019 2263 174.5 +6.82 +6.86 1.476 56.3% 0 +80 +290 80.5% +2.00 7–8 (47%) 15–5 (75%) 96.3 -0.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2020 2277 174.3 +4.76 +6.66 1.375 55.6% -19 +74 — 81.3% +1.93 6–1 (86%) 11–2 (85%) 108.6 -1.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2021 2339 175.3 +5.82 +8.26 1.443 56.3% +2 +113 +292 77.0% +1.99 9–5 (64%) 12–9 (57%) 97.5 -2.44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2022 2354 170.3 +7.26 +6.21 1.481 56.1% +24 +57 +322 80.0% +1.83 6–4 (60%) 18–4 (82%) 101.6 -0.84 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2023 2402 174.8 +7.28 +6.22 1.422 55.5% +78 +9 +271 82.1% +1.97 11–4 (73%) 31–8 (79%) 104.3 -1.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2024 2273 164.2 +4.66 +5.21 1.354 54.9% +76 +122 +363 74.1% +1.59 4–3 (57%) 13–5 (72%) 98.1 -0.71 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2025 2192 161.5 +5.25 +3.10 1.297 54.3% +52 +120 +371 72.3% +1.53 5–1 (83%) 11–13 (46%) 94.1 -1.44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2026 2095 144.5 +2.77 +1.66 1.124 51.9% +65 +137 +379 61.0% +0.65 4–5 (44%) 5–4 (56%) 92.0 -1.86 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2594 180.7 +5.47 +6.81 1.362 55.3% +38 +32 +76 76.2% +1.76 218–88 (71%) 332–174 (66%) 107.4 -1.42 — 2098 161.0 +3.26 +0.98 1.124 51.7% +11 -60 -81 58.2% +0.51 80–55 (59%) 151–106 (59%) 111.2 +1.73

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.