H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:16 UTC
Novak Djokovic vs Fernando Verdasco H2H: 11-4
Novak Djokovic holds a 11–4 lead over Fernando Verdasco in their ATP head-to-head. Across 15 main-draw meetings, Novak Djokovic leads 8–1 on hard courts, while they are tied 3–3 on clay. Most recently, Novak Djokovic won the 2018 Roland Garros fourth round 6-3 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Serbia
Age 39
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
11
–
4
15 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 42
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 5, 2018* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R16 | Clay | Novak Djokovic | 6-3 6-4 6-2 | Fernando Verdasco | Match data |
| Jan 18, 2017* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 6-1 7-6(4) 6-2 | Fernando Verdasco | Match data |
| Jan 7, 2017* | Doha | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 4-6 7-6(7) 6-3 | Fernando Verdasco | Match data |
| Jan 8, 2016* | Doha | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 6-2 6-2 | Fernando Verdasco | Match data |
| Jan 25, 2015* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 7-6(8) 6-3 6-4 | Fernando Verdasco | Match data |
| Oct 4, 2013* | Beijing | ATP 500 | R16 | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 7-5 2-6 6-2 | Fernando Verdasco | Match data |
| May 1, 2010* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | QF | Clay | Fernando Verdasco | 7-6(4) 3-6 6-4 | Novak Djokovic | Match data |
| Apr 17, 2010* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | SF | Clay | Fernando Verdasco | 6-2 6-2 | Novak Djokovic | Match data |
| Oct 10, 2009* | Beijing | ATP 500 | QF | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 6-3 1-6 6-1 | Fernando Verdasco | Match data |
| Sep 10, 2009* | US Open | Grand Slam | QF | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 7-6(2) 1-6 7-5 6-2 | Fernando Verdasco | Match data |
| Apr 18, 2009* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | QF | Clay | Novak Djokovic | 6-2 4-6 6-3 | Fernando Verdasco | Match data |
| Oct 18, 2007* | Madrid Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 6-7(7) 6-3 6-3 | Fernando Verdasco | Match data |
| Jun 5, 2007* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R16 | Clay | Novak Djokovic | 6-3 6-3 7-6(1) | Fernando Verdasco | Match data |
| May 18, 2006* | Hamburg Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Fernando Verdasco | 6-4 6-3 | Novak Djokovic | Match data |
| Sep 4, 2005* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Fernando Verdasco | 6-1 4-6 6-7(2) 6-4 6-4 | Novak Djokovic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Novak Djokovic | #7 | #1 | 16,950 | 2,593 | 1,122 | 223 | 83.4% | 24 | 40 | 7 | 14 | 15 | 100 |
| Fernando Verdasco | #893 | #7 | 3,900 | 2,125 | 549 | 441 | 55.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Novak Djokovic | Fernando Verdasco | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2004 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #186 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2005 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #78 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #173 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2006 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #16 | 1,884 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #109 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2007 | 65–19 | 77.4% | #3 | 2,067 | 0 | 7 | 2004 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #36 | 1,732 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2008 | 58–15 | 79.5% | #3 | 2,120 | 1 | 11 | 2005 | 34–27 | 55.7% | #32 | 1,791 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2009 | 78–17 | 82.1% | #3 | 2,267 | 1 | 16 | 2006 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #35 | 1,726 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2010 | 56–18 | 75.7% | #3 | 2,166 | 1 | 18 | 2007 | 33–26 | 55.9% | #26 | 1,864 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2011 | 72–6 | 92.3% | #1 | 2,357 | 4 | 28 | 2008 | 45–27 | 62.5% | #16 | 1,876 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2012 | 71–10 | 87.7% | #1 | 2,429 | 5 | 34 | 2009 | 51–24 | 68.0% | #9 | 2,001 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2013 | 67–9 | 88.2% | #2 | 2,469 | 6 | 41 | 2010 | 43–21 | 67.2% | #9 | 1,926 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 2014 | 65–8 | 89.0% | #1 | 2,463 | 7 | 48 | 2011 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #24 | 1,930 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 2015 | 82–6 | 93.2% | #1 | 2,554 | 10 | 59 | 2012 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #24 | 1,915 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 2016 | 64–8 | 88.9% | #2 | 2,450 | 12 | 66 | 2013 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #30 | 1,891 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | 2017 | 31–8 | 79.5% | #12 | 2,293 | 12 | 68 | 2014 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #33 | 1,880 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | 2018 | 53–12 | 81.5% | #1 | 2,332 | 14 | 72 | 2015 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #49 | 1,822 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | 2019 | 55–11 | 83.3% | #2 | 2,264 | 16 | 77 | 2016 | 29–26 | 52.7% | #42 | 1,824 | 0 | 7 |
| 33 | 2020 | 35–5 | 87.5% | #1 | 2,275 | 17 | 81 | 2017 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #35 | 1,895 | 0 | 7 |
| 34 | 2021 | 46–5 | 90.2% | #1 | 2,372 | 20 | 86 | 2018 | 33–28 | 54.1% | #28 | 1,915 | 0 | 7 |
| 35 | 2022 | 42–6 | 87.5% | #5 | 2,368 | 21 | 91 | 2019 | 26–27 | 49.1% | #49 | 1,810 | 0 | 7 |
| 36 | 2023 | 54–6 | 90.0% | #1 | 2,405 | 24 | 98 | 2020 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #65 | 1,768 | 0 | 7 |
| 37 | 2024 | 29–9 | 76.3% | #7 | 2,226 | 24 | 98 | 2021 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #154 | 1,627 | 0 | 7 |
| 38 | 2025 | 39–11 | 78.0% | #4 | 2,174 | 24 | 100 | 2022 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #124 | 1,603 | 0 | 7 |
| 39 | 2026 | 15–5 | 75.0% | #7 | 2,155 | 24 | 100 | 2023 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #651 | 1,535 | 0 | 7 |