H2H data updated: 2026-09-08 00:00 UTC

Novak Djokovic vs Fernando Verdasco H2H: 11-4

Novak Djokovic holds an 11–4 lead over Fernando Verdasco in their ATP head-to-head. Across 15 main-draw meetings, Novak Djokovic leads 8–1 on hard courts, while they are tied 3–3 on clay. Most recently, Novak Djokovic won the 2018 Roland Garros fourth round 6-3 6-4 6-2.

Serbia Age 39 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
11 4
15 main-draw meetings
ESP Age 42 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Novak Djokovic #22 6-3 6-4 6-2 Fernando Verdasco #35 Match data Jun 5, 2018* R16 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Novak Djokovic #2 6-1 7-6(4) 6-2 Fernando Verdasco #40 Match data Jan 18, 2017* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Novak Djokovic #2 4-6 7-6(7) 6-3 Fernando Verdasco #42 Match data Jan 7, 2017* SF Qatar Open ATP 250 Hard
Novak Djokovic #1 6-2 6-2 Fernando Verdasco #49 Match data Jan 8, 2016* R16 Qatar Open ATP 250 Hard
Novak Djokovic #1 7-6(8) 6-3 6-4 Fernando Verdasco #33 Match data Jan 25, 2015* R32 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Novak Djokovic #1 7-5 2-6 6-2 Fernando Verdasco #31 Match data Oct 4, 2013* R16 China Open ATP 500 Hard
Fernando Verdasco #9 7-6(4) 3-6 6-4 Novak Djokovic #2 Match data May 1, 2010* QF Italian Open Masters 1000 Clay
Fernando Verdasco #12 6-2 6-2 Novak Djokovic #2 Match data Apr 17, 2010* SF Monte-Carlo Masters Masters 1000 Clay
Novak Djokovic #4 6-3 1-6 6-1 Fernando Verdasco #9 Match data Oct 10, 2009* QF China Open ATP 500 Hard
Novak Djokovic #4 7-6(2) 1-6 7-5 6-2 Fernando Verdasco #10 Match data Sep 10, 2009* QF US Open Grand Slam Hard
Novak Djokovic #3 6-2 4-6 6-3 Fernando Verdasco #8 Match data Apr 18, 2009* QF Monte-Carlo Masters Masters 1000 Clay
Novak Djokovic #3 6-7(7) 6-3 6-3 Fernando Verdasco #32 Match data Oct 18, 2007* R32 Madrid Open Masters 1000 Hard
Novak Djokovic #6 6-3 6-3 7-6(1) Fernando Verdasco #51 Match data Jun 5, 2007* R16 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Fernando Verdasco #34 6-4 6-3 Novak Djokovic #71 Match data May 18, 2006* R32 Hamburg Open Masters 1000 Clay
Fernando Verdasco #48 6-1 4-6 6-7(2) 6-4 6-4 Novak Djokovic #97 Match data Sep 4, 2005* R32 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS Olympics 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Novak Djokovic #5 #1 16,950 2,593 1,141 231 83.2% 24 1 40 7 15 14 101
Fernando Verdasco #893 #7 3,900 2,127 549 442 55.4% 0 0 0 0 1 6 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Novak Djokovic Fernando Verdasco
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2004 1–3 25.0% #186 1,490 0 0
18 2005 9–9 50.0% #78 1,733 0 0 2002 1–2 33.3% #173 1,502 0 0
19 2006 35–17 67.3% #16 1,884 0 2 2003 7–12 36.8% #109 1,591 0 0
20 2007 65–19 77.4% #3 2,068 0 7 2004 31–25 55.4% #36 1,730 0 1
21 2008 63–16 79.7% #3 2,130 1 11 2005 34–27 55.7% #32 1,790 0 1
22 2009 78–17 82.1% #3 2,273 1 16 2006 31–25 55.4% #35 1,726 0 1
23 2010 56–18 75.7% #3 2,163 1 18 2007 33–26 55.9% #26 1,864 0 1
24 2011 72–6 92.3% #1 2,382 4 28 2008 45–27 62.5% #16 1,875 0 2
25 2012 75–12 86.2% #1 2,425 5 34 2009 51–24 68.0% #9 2,003 0 3
26 2013 67–9 88.2% #2 2,471 6 41 2010 43–21 67.2% #9 1,927 0 5
27 2014 65–8 89.0% #1 2,450 7 48 2011 34–24 58.6% #24 1,931 0 5
28 2015 82–6 93.2% #1 2,554 10 59 2012 32–22 59.3% #24 1,901 0 5
29 2016 64–9 87.7% #2 2,429 12 66 2013 27–24 52.9% #30 1,896 0 5
30 2017 31–8 79.5% #12 2,281 12 68 2014 26–20 56.5% #33 1,879 0 6
31 2018 53–12 81.5% #1 2,332 14 72 2015 24–26 48.0% #49 1,822 0 6
32 2019 55–11 83.3% #2 2,262 16 77 2016 29–26 52.7% #42 1,823 0 7
33 2020 35–5 87.5% #1 2,277 17 81 2017 29–25 53.7% #35 1,895 0 7
34 2021 50–7 87.7% #1 2,339 20 86 2018 33–28 54.1% #28 1,914 0 7
35 2022 42–6 87.5% #5 2,353 21 91 2019 26–27 49.1% #49 1,810 0 7
36 2023 54–6 90.0% #1 2,402 24 98 2020 6–7 46.2% #65 1,768 0 7
37 2024 35–9 79.5% #7 2,273 24 99 2021 2–8 20.0% #154 1,627 0 7
38 2025 39–11 78.0% #4 2,191 24 101 2022 5–11 31.2% #124 1,603 0 7
39 2026 15–7 68.2% #5 2,094 24 101 2023 0–5 0.0% #651 1,535 0 7

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Novak Djokovic Fernando Verdasco
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2004 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
18 2005 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 2002 1 2 3 33.3%
19 2006 14 8 22 63.6% 14 5 19 73.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 2003 6 7 13 46.2% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2007 43 12 55 78.2% 16 5 21 76.2% 6 2 8 75.0% 2004 6 10 16 37.5% 20 11 31 64.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2008 42 11 53 79.2% 16 3 19 84.2% 5 2 7 71.4% 2005 14 12 26 53.8% 15 11 26 57.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 2 6 66.7%
22 2009 53 11 64 82.8% 17 4 21 81.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 2006 9 12 21 42.9% 17 9 26 65.4% 5 2 7 71.4% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 2010 40 12 52 76.9% 10 4 14 71.4% 6 2 8 75.0% 2007 18 14 32 56.3% 9 8 17 52.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
24 2011 46 5 51 90.2% 19 1 20 95.0% 7 0 7 100.0% 2008 20 16 36 55.6% 17 8 25 68.0% 8 3 11 72.7%
25 2012 50 5 55 90.9% 16 4 20 80.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 2009 35 15 50 70.0% 12 6 18 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1%
26 2013 49 5 54 90.7% 12 3 15 80.0% 6 1 7 85.7% 2010 21 13 34 61.8% 22 7 29 75.9% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2014 44 6 50 88.0% 14 2 16 87.5% 7 0 7 100.0% 2011 19 14 33 57.6% 12 8 20 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
28 2015 59 5 64 92.2% 16 1 17 94.1% 7 0 7 100.0% 2012 11 10 21 52.4% 19 10 29 65.5% 2 2 4 50.0%
29 2016 46 6 52 88.5% 16 2 18 88.9% 2 1 3 66.7% 2013 9 13 22 40.9% 12 9 21 57.1% 6 2 8 75.0%
30 2017 10 3 13 76.9% 13 4 17 76.5% 8 1 9 88.9% 2014 11 11 22 50.0% 13 7 20 65.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
31 2018 31 6 37 83.8% 11 5 16 68.8% 11 1 12 91.7% 2015 11 14 25 44.0% 9 9 18 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
32 2019 32 8 40 80.0% 16 3 19 84.2% 7 0 7 100.0% 2016 13 15 28 46.4% 14 8 22 63.6% 2 3 5 40.0%
33 2020 24 4 28 85.7% 11 1 12 91.7% 2017 18 15 33 54.5% 10 7 17 58.8% 1 3 4 25.0%
34 2021 25 4 29 86.2% 18 3 21 85.7% 7 0 7 100.0% 2018 18 14 32 56.3% 14 10 24 58.3% 1 4 5 20.0%
35 2022 20 2 22 90.9% 15 4 19 78.9% 7 0 7 100.0% 2019 13 14 27 48.1% 8 9 17 47.1% 5 4 9 55.6%
36 2023 36 2 38 94.7% 12 3 15 80.0% 6 1 7 85.7% 2020 6 5 11 54.5% 0 2 2 0.0%
37 2024 13 4 17 76.5% 16 4 20 80.0% 6 1 7 85.7% 2021 0 2 2 0.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0%
38 2025 25 7 32 78.1% 9 3 12 75.0% 5 1 6 83.3% 2022 1 6 7 14.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
39 2026 8 4 12 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 1 6 83.3% 2023 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
Career 712 134 846 84.2% 292 71 363 80.4% 131 22 153 85.6% 6 4 10 60.0% 259 235 494 52.4% 231 156 387 59.7% 51 44 95 53.7% 8 7 15 53.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 1,324/1,372 of Novak Djokovic's and 988/991 of Fernando Verdasco's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Novak Djokovic Fernando Verdasco
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2004 4/4 6.5 5.3 62.5% 59.7% 42.5% 44.3% 38.4% 53.1% 41.5% —/—
18 2005 18/18 4.9 3.2 63.1% 69.1% 48.2% 60.2% 44.6% 61.2% 37.8% 2002 3/3 1.7 6.3 71.8% 56.3% 32.1% 54.4% 39.3% 49.7% 37.0%
19 2006 52/52 5.5 3.0 63.0% 72.3% 53.1% 59.7% 49.3% 65.1% 40.0% 2003 18/19 5.0 4.3 64.8% 68.3% 55.7% 51.0% 42.6% 63.8% 34.4%
20 2007 83/84 6.2 2.3 64.2% 73.1% 54.5% 64.7% 44.4% 66.4% 41.0% 2004 56/56 4.8 3.2 66.0% 71.0% 56.3% 65.5% 40.6% 65.7% 37.3%
21 2008 73/79 6.3 2.0 64.7% 74.2% 58.0% 67.4% 50.9% 68.6% 42.6% 2005 61/61 6.6 3.7 65.1% 72.5% 51.7% 60.0% 44.5% 65.2% 38.9%
22 2009 95/95 5.3 2.8 63.1% 73.3% 54.3% 63.6% 43.6% 66.3% 42.5% 2006 56/56 3.9 3.8 72.5% 68.7% 49.7% 62.8% 43.6% 63.3% 38.3%
23 2010 72/74 4.2 3.9 64.0% 71.6% 54.0% 65.8% 48.0% 65.2% 42.4% 2007 59/59 4.6 3.4 72.4% 70.2% 52.2% 55.3% 38.6% 65.1% 38.2%
24 2011 75/78 4.6 1.9 65.5% 74.8% 57.2% 63.6% 51.1% 68.6% 46.2% 2008 72/72 3.8 4.1 72.6% 69.3% 53.0% 55.6% 47.6% 64.7% 40.8%
25 2012 81/87 5.6 1.8 64.5% 75.7% 56.9% 65.1% 50.8% 69.1% 44.0% 2009 75/75 6.1 3.7 69.1% 73.1% 54.3% 62.2% 46.5% 67.1% 41.1%
26 2013 76/76 6.3 1.6 65.8% 76.3% 62.2% 64.6% 45.0% 71.3% 44.6% 2010 64/64 5.4 4.8 67.1% 71.2% 49.4% 60.0% 44.6% 64.0% 40.3%
27 2014 69/73 6.2 1.5 67.0% 75.5% 57.5% 60.3% 47.7% 69.6% 44.3% 2011 58/58 5.5 3.9 68.8% 70.7% 51.3% 61.5% 44.9% 64.6% 38.1%
28 2015 87/88 5.4 1.6 66.7% 75.4% 61.4% 62.8% 48.1% 70.7% 44.3% 2012 53/54 4.6 3.8 69.7% 69.7% 51.4% 64.4% 42.1% 64.1% 38.3%
29 2016 71/73 3.8 2.4 64.8% 75.0% 57.4% 62.1% 49.2% 68.6% 44.5% 2013 50/51 5.9 5.0 61.7% 72.8% 54.0% 56.4% 36.3% 65.3% 37.4%
30 2017 38/39 4.1 1.9 66.8% 73.4% 53.8% 61.4% 47.9% 66.8% 41.1% 2014 46/46 5.7 4.7 66.3% 71.7% 51.8% 65.6% 43.2% 64.5% 37.3%
31 2018 65/65 5.3 2.3 66.4% 75.5% 58.1% 64.1% 45.1% 69.7% 42.5% 2015 50/50 7.7 4.1 64.6% 73.5% 52.3% 60.8% 35.2% 66.1% 35.3%
32 2019 65/66 5.7 2.6 66.1% 77.4% 59.4% 63.1% 53.6% 71.3% 42.4% 2016 55/55 6.3 3.9 64.0% 73.2% 51.4% 62.1% 38.4% 65.1% 37.8%
33 2020 40/40 6.1 2.8 64.1% 75.9% 53.8% 64.3% 43.4% 67.9% 44.1% 2017 54/54 4.0 3.4 69.0% 70.6% 51.0% 53.7% 45.7% 64.6% 39.5%
34 2021 50/57 8.3 2.7 64.8% 76.7% 54.6% 59.4% 48.3% 68.9% 44.8% 2018 61/61 6.7 4.2 63.1% 72.0% 48.7% 59.3% 42.9% 63.4% 39.0%
35 2022 47/48 6.0 1.9 65.8% 78.5% 58.2% 59.4% 46.9% 71.7% 41.9% 2019 53/53 7.7 3.7 63.8% 71.8% 49.4% 62.4% 40.0% 63.7% 36.0%
36 2023 60/60 7.2 2.9 63.5% 78.0% 57.9% 60.8% 45.3% 70.7% 41.6% 2020 13/13 6.3 2.6 67.5% 68.9% 49.5% 59.7% 29.5% 62.7% 36.4%
37 2024 36/44 7.3 2.7 63.8% 76.0% 56.7% 61.5% 43.5% 69.1% 41.9% 2021 10/10 3.9 3.2 66.9% 60.7% 48.4% 54.2% 28.3% 56.6% 35.0%
38 2025 46/50 8.2 2.1 67.2% 76.8% 55.8% 53.0% 47.1% 69.9% 39.0% 2022 16/16 4.3 2.9 63.4% 66.0% 48.6% 58.4% 37.6% 59.8% 36.2%
39 2026 21/22 8.8 3.5 68.2% 74.6% 54.0% 64.4% 39.0% 67.8% 36.2% 2023 5/5 1.0 4.0 62.6% 53.7% 32.4% 36.3% 45.3% 45.6% 34.0%
Career 1,324/1,372 5.8 2.3 65.1% 75.0% 56.7% 62.7% 47.4% 68.6% 42.8% 988/991 5.5 3.9 67.3% 70.9% 51.6% 59.9% 42.1% 64.4% 38.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Novak Djokovic Fernando Verdasco
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2004 1491 107.5 -0.98 -0.85 0.885 47.7% +57 36.4% -0.91 1–2 (33%) 0–1 +0.01
18 2005 1733 128.8 -0.13 +0.84 0.974 49.7% -92 -124 -27 51.0% -0.14 2–2 (50%) 8–2 (80%) 106.4 -0.77 2002 1502 102.0 -2.56 -2.05 0.736 44.2% +27 28.6% -1.72 1–0 +0.02
19 2006 1885 144.3 +2.58 +1.86 1.145 52.6% -115 -18 -101 63.6% +0.85 10–6 (63%) 14–5 (74%) 113.5 +0.06 2003 1592 125.8 +1.64 -0.91 0.950 48.7% +9 -89 39.6% -0.77 2–4 (33%) 7–7 (50%) 99.9 -0.48
20 2007 2069 168.7 +4.20 +4.63 1.219 53.6% -9 -83 -156 70.3% +1.30 18–6 (75%) 28–13 (68%) 114.0 -0.04 2004 1731 140.6 +2.76 +0.54 1.085 51.4% -84 +24 -92 53.2% +0.29 6–8 (43%) 11–12 (48%) 100.4 -1.34
21 2008 2130 172.3 +5.71 +7.08 1.355 55.3% +34 +15 -166 75.3% +1.68 8–6 (57%) 18–12 (60%) 99.3 -1.51 2005 1791 146.9 +2.51 +2.36 1.116 51.9% -27 +11 -149 55.1% +0.46 10–12 (45%) 12–11 (52%) 100.7 -2.07
22 2009 2274 175.6 +3.72 +6.70 1.260 54.2% +35 -48 -230 74.9% +1.62 18–4 (82%) 19–15 (56%) 109.4 +2.04 2006 1727 137.0 +0.96 +1.48 1.042 50.6% -72 +110 +30 56.5% +0.19 10–10 (50%) 14–10 (58%) 101.8 +0.48
23 2010 2163 172.7 +2.60 +6.48 1.220 53.7% +62 0 -55 71.1% +1.38 9–7 (56%) 11–8 (58%) 96.1 +0.94 2007 1864 150.9 +2.40 +2.23 1.097 51.3% -58 -13 -91 54.4% +0.38 11–10 (52%) 10–14 (42%) 101.0 -1.77
24 2011 2383 182.8 +6.53 +9.98 1.473 57.2% +13 -31 -72 82.9% +2.35 14–2 (88%) 8–7 (53%) 103.4 -1.11 2008 1876 151.0 +1.44 +3.82 1.154 52.4% -51 +93 +36 58.0% +0.69 13–9 (59%) 13–14 (48%) 101.8 +1.79
25 2012 2426 182.4 +6.77 +8.20 1.427 56.2% +70 -20 -80 77.8% +2.07 16–3 (84%) 17–12 (59%) 104.7 -2.53 2009 2004 172.3 +4.14 +5.15 1.247 53.9% +20 +44 -100 66.0% +1.22 11–12 (48%) 15–19 (44%) 96.0 -0.23
26 2013 2471 184.6 +8.33 +8.48 1.555 57.0% +86 -60 -72 79.4% +2.09 15–6 (71%) 19–9 (68%) 102.2 -1.97 2010 1928 161.5 +1.35 +3.83 1.119 52.0% +11 +172 59.1% +0.69 18–5 (78%) 17–17 (50%) 104.3 +1.41
27 2014 2451 184.1 +6.63 +9.04 1.457 56.5% +45 +29 +72 78.4% +2.05 15–2 (88%) 13–10 (57%) 103.8 -1.15 2011 1931 156.9 +1.76 +2.02 1.077 51.0% -19 +115 -49 55.4% +0.39 9–9 (50%) 9–10 (47%) 97.4 -0.03
28 2015 2554 186.4 +7.05 +9.59 1.509 56.9% +60 +29 +50 83.8% +2.33 16–2 (89%) 17–9 (65%) 106.0 +0.06 2012 1902 158.3 +1.78 +1.64 1.068 50.9% -15 +110 -16 57.3% +0.45 7–6 (54%) 10–11 (48%) 96.5 +0.32
29 2016 2430 183.4 +5.55 +8.54 1.418 56.0% +83 +151 +115 81.8% +2.05 8–1 (89%) 19–7 (73%) 103.4 -0.65 2013 1897 150.8 +1.90 +1.27 1.077 50.9% -69 +47 +113 54.3% +0.20 11–12 (48%) 14–10 (58%) 102.3 -0.19
30 2017 2281 169.1 +3.30 +4.52 1.236 53.9% +127 +161 +137 73.4% +1.50 8–2 (80%) 10–5 (67%) 100.1 -0.74 2014 1880 147.7 +0.99 +0.74 1.048 50.8% -58 +69 +74 55.4% +0.36 11–12 (48%) 12–16 (43%) 94.8 +1.67
31 2018 2333 175.5 +5.76 +7.04 1.406 55.3% +44 +2 +149 76.3% +1.72 8–6 (57%) 15–9 (63%) 95.3 -1.21 2015 1822 158.0 +2.13 -0.07 1.043 50.6% -12 +53 +115 47.4% +0.18 12–11 (52%) 13–16 (45%) 97.0 -2.42
32 2019 2263 174.5 +6.82 +6.86 1.476 56.3% 0 +80 +290 80.5% +2.00 7–8 (47%) 15–5 (75%) 96.3 -0.39 2016 1823 157.6 +1.70 +1.52 1.083 51.2% -31 +108 +59 53.3% +0.30 6–12 (33%) 15–12 (56%) 97.7 -1.95
33 2020 2277 174.3 +4.76 +6.66 1.375 55.6% -19 +74 81.3% +1.93 6–1 (86%) 11–2 (85%) 108.6 -1.17 2017 1896 164.3 +0.98 +3.38 1.115 51.7% -12 +46 -99 55.4% +0.30 6–15 (29%) 18–9 (67%) 98.6 -2.48
34 2021 2339 175.3 +5.82 +8.26 1.443 56.3% +2 +113 +292 77.0% +1.99 9–5 (64%) 12–9 (57%) 97.5 -2.44 2018 1915 159.9 -0.10 +2.46 1.065 50.9% +25 +13 -172 51.9% +0.27 15–11 (58%) 8–17 (32%) 94.6 -1.33
35 2022 2354 170.3 +7.26 +6.21 1.481 56.1% +24 +57 +322 80.0% +1.83 6–4 (60%) 18–4 (82%) 101.6 -0.84 2019 1810 151.6 -0.18 +0.45 0.990 50.1% +22 +37 +5 51.4% +0.28 13–13 (50%) 8–11 (42%) 96.5 -0.47
36 2023 2402 174.8 +7.28 +6.22 1.422 55.5% +78 +9 +271 82.1% +1.97 11–4 (73%) 31–8 (79%) 104.3 -1.78 2020 1768 132.5 -0.34 -1.01 0.975 49.0% +72 48.5% -0.27 1–2 (33%) 2–0 -0.38
37 2024 2273 164.2 +4.66 +5.21 1.354 54.9% +76 +122 +363 74.1% +1.59 4–3 (57%) 13–5 (72%) 98.1 -0.71 2021 1627 114.6 -2.83 -1.10 0.807 46.0% +81 25.0% -1.25 1–2 (33%) -0.25
38 2025 2192 161.5 +5.25 +3.10 1.297 54.3% +52 +120 +371 72.3% +1.53 5–1 (83%) 11–13 (46%) 94.1 -1.44 2022 1604 122.9 -3.29 -0.30 0.900 48.1% +74 +90 36.6% -0.81 2–4 (33%) 5–5 (50%) 98.8 +0.75
39 2026 2095 144.5 +2.77 +1.66 1.124 51.9% +65 +137 +378 61.0% +0.65 4–5 (44%) 5–4 (56%) 92.0 -1.86 2023 1536 96.8 -6.12 -1.90 0.625 40.2% +105 9.1% -3.27 0–1 0–3 (0%) +0.03
Career 2594 180.7 +5.47 +6.81 1.362 55.3% +38 +32 +76 76.2% +1.76 218–88 (71%) 332–174 (66%) 107.4 -1.42 2128 158.8 +1.50 +2.00 1.077 51.2% -17 +67 -9 54.3% +0.35 175–178 (50%) 214–226 (49%) 97.0 -0.90

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.