H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC
Novak Djokovic vs Gael Monfils H2H: 18-0
Novak Djokovic holds a 18–0 lead over Gael Monfils in their ATP head-to-head. Across 18 main-draw meetings, Novak Djokovic leads 15–0 on hard courts and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Novak Djokovic won the 2025 Brisbane International Presented by ANZ fourth round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Serbia
Age 39
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
18
–
0
18 main draw meetings
France
Age 39
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 3, 2025* | Brisbane International Presented by ANZ | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 6-3 6-3 | Gael Monfils | Match data |
| Aug 18, 2023* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 6-3 6-2 | Gael Monfils | Match data |
| May 4, 2022* | Madrid Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Novak Djokovic | 6-3 6-2 | Gael Monfils | Match data |
| Nov 5, 2021* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Novak Djokovic | (w/o) | Gael Monfils | Match data |
| Feb 29, 2020* | Dubai | ATP 500 | SF | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 2-6 7-6(8) 6-1 | Gael Monfils | Match data |
| Jan 18, 2018* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 4-6 6-3 6-1 6-3 | Gael Monfils | Match data |
| Jul 1, 2017* | Eastbourne | ATP 250 | F | Grass | Novak Djokovic | 6-3 6-4 | Gael Monfils | Match data |
| Sep 10, 2016* | US Open | Grand Slam | SF | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 6-3 6-2 3-6 6-2 | Gael Monfils | Match data |
| Jul 30, 2016* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | SF | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 6-3 6-2 | Gael Monfils | Match data |
| Oct 31, 2014* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 6-3 7-6(2) | Gael Monfils | Match data |
| Aug 7, 2014* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 6-2 6-7(4) 7-6(2) | Gael Monfils | Match data |
| Oct 12, 2013* | Shanghai Masters | Masters 1000 | QF | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 6-7(4) 6-2 6-4 | Gael Monfils | Match data |
| Aug 20, 2011* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | QF | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 3-6 6-4 6-3 | Gael Monfils | Match data |
| Aug 13, 2011* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | QF | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 6-2 6-1 | Gael Monfils | Match data |
| Sep 9, 2010* | US Open | Grand Slam | QF | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 7-6(2) 6-1 6-2 | Gael Monfils | Match data |
| Nov 15, 2009* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | F | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 6-2 5-7 7-6(3) | Gael Monfils | Match data |
| Jun 7, 2006* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R16 | Clay | Novak Djokovic | 7-6(5) 7-6(5) 6-3 | Gael Monfils | Match data |
| Aug 31, 2005* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 7-5 4-6 7-6(5) 0-6 7-5 | Gael Monfils | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Novak Djokovic | #7 | #1 | 16,950 | 2,593 | 1,122 | 223 | 83.4% | 24 | 40 | 7 | 14 | 15 | 100 |
| Gael Monfils | #325 | #6 | 3,815 | 2,151 | 569 | 356 | 61.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 10 | 13 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Novak Djokovic | Gael Monfils | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2004 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #186 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #239 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2005 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #78 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #30 | 1,753 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2006 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #16 | 1,884 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #46 | 1,721 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2007 | 65–19 | 77.4% | #3 | 2,067 | 0 | 7 | 2007 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #38 | 1,781 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2008 | 58–15 | 79.5% | #3 | 2,120 | 1 | 11 | 2008 | 27–16 | 62.8% | #14 | 1,933 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2009 | 78–17 | 82.1% | #3 | 2,267 | 1 | 16 | 2009 | 42–19 | 68.9% | #13 | 1,994 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2010 | 56–18 | 75.7% | #3 | 2,166 | 1 | 18 | 2010 | 42–19 | 68.9% | #12 | 2,062 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2011 | 72–6 | 92.3% | #1 | 2,357 | 4 | 28 | 2011 | 37–17 | 68.5% | #16 | 1,996 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2012 | 71–10 | 87.7% | #1 | 2,429 | 5 | 34 | 2012 | 18–10 | 64.3% | #77 | 1,936 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2013 | 67–9 | 88.2% | #2 | 2,469 | 6 | 41 | 2013 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #31 | 1,929 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 2014 | 65–8 | 89.0% | #1 | 2,463 | 7 | 48 | 2014 | 32–15 | 68.1% | #18 | 2,054 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 2015 | 82–6 | 93.2% | #1 | 2,554 | 10 | 59 | 2015 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #24 | 1,951 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 2016 | 64–8 | 88.9% | #2 | 2,450 | 12 | 66 | 2016 | 40–17 | 70.2% | #7 | 2,052 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 2017 | 31–8 | 79.5% | #12 | 2,293 | 12 | 68 | 2017 | 20–14 | 58.8% | #46 | 1,966 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | 2018 | 53–12 | 81.5% | #1 | 2,332 | 14 | 72 | 2018 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #29 | 1,921 | 0 | 7 |
| 32 | 2019 | 55–11 | 83.3% | #2 | 2,264 | 16 | 77 | 2019 | 37–20 | 64.9% | #10 | 1,920 | 0 | 8 |
| 33 | 2020 | 35–5 | 87.5% | #1 | 2,275 | 17 | 81 | 2020 | 15–6 | 71.4% | #11 | 1,934 | 0 | 10 |
| 34 | 2021 | 46–5 | 90.2% | #1 | 2,372 | 20 | 86 | 2021 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #21 | 1,910 | 0 | 10 |
| 35 | 2022 | 42–6 | 87.5% | #5 | 2,368 | 21 | 91 | 2022 | 14–7 | 66.7% | #52 | 1,934 | 0 | 11 |
| 36 | 2023 | 54–6 | 90.0% | #1 | 2,405 | 24 | 98 | 2023 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #74 | 1,925 | 0 | 12 |
| 37 | 2024 | 29–9 | 76.3% | #7 | 2,226 | 24 | 98 | 2024 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #55 | 1,895 | 0 | 12 |
| 38 | 2025 | 39–11 | 78.0% | #4 | 2,174 | 24 | 100 | 2025 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #68 | 1,771 | 0 | 13 |
| 39 | 2026 | 15–5 | 75.0% | #7 | 2,155 | 24 | 100 | 2026 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #325 | 1,685 | 0 | 13 |