H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 22:32 UTC
Novak Djokovic vs Grigor Dimitrov H2H: 13-1
Novak Djokovic holds a 13–1 lead over Grigor Dimitrov in their ATP head-to-head. Across 14 main-draw meetings, Novak Djokovic leads 9–0 on hard courts and 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Novak Djokovic won the 2025 Miami Open Presented by Itau semifinal 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Serbia
Age 39
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
13
–
1
14 main draw meetings
Bulgaria
Age 35
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 29, 2025* | Miami Open Presented by Itau | Masters 1000 | SF | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 6-2 6-3 | Grigor Dimitrov | Match data |
| Nov 5, 2023* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | F | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 6-4 6-3 | Grigor Dimitrov | Match data |
| May 15, 2023* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Novak Djokovic | 6-3 4-6 6-1 | Grigor Dimitrov | Match data |
| Jan 22, 2023* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 7-6(7) 6-3 6-4 | Grigor Dimitrov | Match data |
| Nov 2, 2019* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | SF | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 7-6(5) 6-4 | Grigor Dimitrov | Match data |
| Aug 17, 2018* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 2-6 6-3 6-4 | Grigor Dimitrov | Match data |
| Jun 22, 2018* | Queen's Club | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | Novak Djokovic | 6-4 6-1 | Grigor Dimitrov | Match data |
| Nov 4, 2016* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 4-6 6-2 6-3 | Grigor Dimitrov | Match data |
| Oct 4, 2014* | Beijing | ATP 500 | QF | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 6-2 6-4 | Grigor Dimitrov | Match data |
| Jul 5, 2014* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | SF | Grass | Novak Djokovic | 6-4 3-6 7-6(2) 7-6(7) | Grigor Dimitrov | Match data |
| Jun 2, 2013* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Novak Djokovic | 6-2 6-2 6-3 | Grigor Dimitrov | Match data |
| May 8, 2013* | Madrid Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Grigor Dimitrov | 7-6(6) 6-7(8) 6-3 | Novak Djokovic | Match data |
| Mar 12, 2013* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 7-6(4) 6-1 | Grigor Dimitrov | Match data |
| Oct 10, 2012* | Shanghai Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 6-3 6-2 | Grigor Dimitrov | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Novak Djokovic | #7 | #1 | 16,950 | 2,593 | 1,122 | 223 | 83.4% | 24 | 40 | 7 | 14 | 15 | 100 |
| Grigor Dimitrov | #146 | #3 | 5,150 | 2,176 | 476 | 310 | 60.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Novak Djokovic | Grigor Dimitrov | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2004 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #186 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #493 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2005 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #78 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #288 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2006 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #16 | 1,884 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #106 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2007 | 65–19 | 77.4% | #3 | 2,067 | 0 | 7 | 2011 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #76 | 1,739 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2008 | 58–15 | 79.5% | #3 | 2,120 | 1 | 11 | 2012 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #48 | 1,846 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2009 | 78–17 | 82.1% | #3 | 2,267 | 1 | 16 | 2013 | 35–23 | 60.3% | #23 | 1,954 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2010 | 56–18 | 75.7% | #3 | 2,166 | 1 | 18 | 2014 | 50–18 | 73.5% | #11 | 2,095 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 2011 | 72–6 | 92.3% | #1 | 2,357 | 4 | 28 | 2015 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #28 | 1,950 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2012 | 71–10 | 87.7% | #1 | 2,429 | 5 | 34 | 2016 | 40–25 | 61.5% | #17 | 2,018 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2013 | 67–9 | 88.2% | #2 | 2,469 | 6 | 41 | 2017 | 49–19 | 72.1% | #3 | 2,134 | 0 | 8 |
| 27 | 2014 | 65–8 | 89.0% | #1 | 2,463 | 7 | 48 | 2018 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #19 | 1,933 | 0 | 8 |
| 28 | 2015 | 82–6 | 93.2% | #1 | 2,554 | 10 | 59 | 2019 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #20 | 1,944 | 0 | 8 |
| 29 | 2016 | 64–8 | 88.9% | #2 | 2,450 | 12 | 66 | 2020 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #19 | 1,957 | 0 | 8 |
| 30 | 2017 | 31–8 | 79.5% | #12 | 2,293 | 12 | 68 | 2021 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #28 | 1,935 | 0 | 8 |
| 31 | 2018 | 53–12 | 81.5% | #1 | 2,332 | 14 | 72 | 2022 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #28 | 1,864 | 0 | 8 |
| 32 | 2019 | 55–11 | 83.3% | #2 | 2,264 | 16 | 77 | 2023 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #14 | 2,095 | 0 | 8 |
| 33 | 2020 | 35–5 | 87.5% | #1 | 2,275 | 17 | 81 | 2024 | 45–18 | 71.4% | #10 | 2,008 | 0 | 9 |
| 34 | 2021 | 46–5 | 90.2% | #1 | 2,372 | 20 | 86 | 2025 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #44 | 1,956 | 0 | 9 |
| 35 | 2022 | 42–6 | 87.5% | #5 | 2,368 | 21 | 91 | 2026 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #146 | 1,810 | 0 | 9 |
| 36 | 2023 | 54–6 | 90.0% | #1 | 2,405 | 24 | 98 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2024 | 29–9 | 76.3% | #7 | 2,226 | 24 | 98 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2025 | 39–11 | 78.0% | #4 | 2,174 | 24 | 100 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 2026 | 15–5 | 75.0% | #7 | 2,155 | 24 | 100 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |