H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Novak Djokovic vs Guillermo Garcia-Lopez H2H: 7-0

Novak Djokovic holds a 7–0 lead over Guillermo Garcia-Lopez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Novak Djokovic leads 3–0 on clay and 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Novak Djokovic won the 2014 Beijing third round 6-2 6-1.

Serbia Age 39 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
7 0
7 main draw meetings
ESP Age 43 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 2, 2014* Beijing ATP 500 R32 Hard Novak Djokovic #1 6-2 6-1 Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #38 Match data
Apr 19, 2014* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 QF Clay Novak Djokovic #2 4-6 6-3 6-1 Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #38 Match data
May 6, 2011* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 R16 Clay Novak Djokovic #2 6-1 6-2 Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #29 Match data
Oct 16, 2010* Shanghai Masters Masters 1000 QF Hard Novak Djokovic #2 6-2 6-3 Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #35 Match data
Feb 24, 2010* Dubai ATP 500 R32 Hard Novak Djokovic #2 6-4 6-4 Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #47 Match data
May 4, 2007* Estoril ATP 250 QF Clay Novak Djokovic #5 6-4 1-6 7-5 Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #62 Match data
Jun 24, 2005* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Novak Djokovic #128 3-6 3-6 7-6(5) 7-6(3) 6-4 Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #81 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Novak Djokovic #7 #1 16,950 2,593 1,122 223 83.4% 24 40 7 14 15 100
Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #1,009 #23 1,465 1,938 299 353 45.9% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Novak Djokovic Guillermo Garcia-Lopez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2004 1–3 25.0% #186 1,490 0 0
18 2005 9–9 50.0% #78 1,732 0 0
19 2006 35–17 67.3% #16 1,884 0 2
20 2007 65–19 77.4% #3 2,067 0 7 2003 0–1 0.0% #244 1,497 0 0
21 2008 58–15 79.5% #3 2,120 1 11 2004 5–7 41.7% #129 1,578 0 0
22 2009 78–17 82.1% #3 2,267 1 16 2005 19–26 42.2% #91 1,589 0 0
23 2010 56–18 75.7% #3 2,166 1 18 2006 15–20 42.9% #68 1,595 0 0
24 2011 72–6 92.3% #1 2,357 4 28 2007 13–22 37.1% #90 1,526 0 0
25 2012 71–10 87.7% #1 2,429 5 34 2008 22–22 50.0% #62 1,646 0 0
26 2013 67–9 88.2% #2 2,469 6 41 2009 28–27 50.9% #41 1,757 0 1
27 2014 65–8 89.0% #1 2,463 7 48 2010 31–23 57.4% #33 1,874 0 2
28 2015 82–6 93.2% #1 2,554 10 59 2011 20–29 40.8% #65 1,712 0 2
29 2016 64–8 88.9% #2 2,450 12 66 2012 20–25 44.4% #76 1,719 0 2
30 2017 31–8 79.5% #12 2,293 12 68 2013 20–21 48.8% #62 1,774 0 2
31 2018 53–12 81.5% #1 2,332 14 72 2014 25–26 49.0% #36 1,740 0 3
32 2019 55–11 83.3% #2 2,264 16 77 2015 32–25 56.1% #27 1,853 0 5
33 2020 35–5 87.5% #1 2,275 17 81 2016 22–31 41.5% #70 1,686 0 5
34 2021 46–5 90.2% #1 2,372 20 86 2017 5–15 25.0% #70 1,747 0 5
35 2022 42–6 87.5% #5 2,368 21 91 2018 16–23 41.0% #105 1,675 0 5
36 2023 54–6 90.0% #1 2,405 24 98 2019 6–10 37.5% #144 1,694 0 5
37 2024 29–9 76.3% #7 2,226 24 98
38 2025 39–11 78.0% #4 2,174 24 100
39 2026 15–5 75.0% #7 2,155 24 100