H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Novak Djokovic vs Hyeon Chung H2H: 1-1
Novak Djokovic and Hyeon Chung are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Hyeon Chung won the 2018 Australian Open fourth round 7-6(4) 7-5 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Serbia
Age 39
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
South Korea
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 23, 2018* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Hard | Hyeon Chung | 7-6(4) 7-5 7-6(3) | Novak Djokovic | Match data |
| Jan 20, 2016* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 6-3 6-2 6-4 | Hyeon Chung | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Novak Djokovic | #7 | #1 | 16,950 | 2,593 | 1,122 | 223 | 83.4% | 24 | 40 | 7 | 14 | 15 | 100 |
| Hyeon Chung | #493 | #19 | 1,897 | 2,022 | 71 | 67 | 51.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Novak Djokovic | Hyeon Chung | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2004 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #186 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #550 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #78 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #51 | 1,703 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #16 | 1,884 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #104 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 65–19 | 77.4% | #3 | 2,067 | 0 | 7 | 2017 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #58 | 1,869 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 58–15 | 79.5% | #3 | 2,120 | 1 | 11 | 2018 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #25 | 1,871 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 78–17 | 82.1% | #3 | 2,267 | 1 | 16 | 2019 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #128 | 1,850 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 56–18 | 75.7% | #3 | 2,166 | 1 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 72–6 | 92.3% | #1 | 2,357 | 4 | 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 71–10 | 87.7% | #1 | 2,429 | 5 | 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 67–9 | 88.2% | #2 | 2,469 | 6 | 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 65–8 | 89.0% | #1 | 2,463 | 7 | 48 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 82–6 | 93.2% | #1 | 2,554 | 10 | 59 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 64–8 | 88.9% | #2 | 2,450 | 12 | 66 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 31–8 | 79.5% | #12 | 2,293 | 12 | 68 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 53–12 | 81.5% | #1 | 2,332 | 14 | 72 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 55–11 | 83.3% | #2 | 2,264 | 16 | 77 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 35–5 | 87.5% | #1 | 2,275 | 17 | 81 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 46–5 | 90.2% | #1 | 2,372 | 20 | 86 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 42–6 | 87.5% | #5 | 2,368 | 21 | 91 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 54–6 | 90.0% | #1 | 2,405 | 24 | 98 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 29–9 | 76.3% | #7 | 2,226 | 24 | 98 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 39–11 | 78.0% | #4 | 2,174 | 24 | 100 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 15–5 | 75.0% | #7 | 2,155 | 24 | 100 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |