H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Novak Djokovic vs Ivan Ljubicic H2H: 6-2

Novak Djokovic holds a 6–2 lead over Ivan Ljubicic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Novak Djokovic leads 4–1 on hard courts and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Novak Djokovic won the 2010 Shanghai Masters third round 6-3 6-3.

Serbia Age 39 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
6 2
8 main draw meetings
CRO Age 47 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 13, 2010* Shanghai Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Novak Djokovic #2 6-3 6-3 Ivan Ljubicic #17 Match data
Mar 18, 2010* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Ivan Ljubicic #26 7-5 6-3 Novak Djokovic #2 Match data
Feb 26, 2010* Dubai ATP 500 QF Hard Novak Djokovic #2 2-6 6-4 6-0 Ivan Ljubicic #26 Match data
Sep 2, 2009* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Novak Djokovic #4 6-3 6-1 6-3 Ivan Ljubicic #51 Match data
Aug 19, 2009* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Novak Djokovic #4 7-6(5) 6-4 Ivan Ljubicic #54 Match data
May 16, 2009* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 QF Clay Novak Djokovic #4 6-4 6-4 Ivan Ljubicic #54 Match data
Apr 23, 2008* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Novak Djokovic #3 6-3 6-3 Ivan Ljubicic #29 Match data
Feb 4, 2006* Zagreb ATP 250 SF Carpet Ivan Ljubicic #5 6-7(6) 6-3 6-4 Novak Djokovic #81 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Novak Djokovic #7 #1 16,950 2,593 1,122 223 83.4% 24 40 7 14 15 100
Ivan Ljubicic #53 #3 3,315 2,052 400 282 58.7% 0 1 0 0 9 10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Novak Djokovic Ivan Ljubicic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2004 1–3 25.0% #186 1,490 0 0 1996 1–1 50.0% #576 1,509 0 0
18 2005 9–9 50.0% #78 1,732 0 0 1997 1–4 20.0% #289 1,489 0 0
19 2006 35–17 67.3% #16 1,884 0 2 1998 0–1 0.0% #293 1,482 0 0
20 2007 65–19 77.4% #3 2,067 0 7 1999 11–12 47.8% #77 1,587 0 0
21 2008 58–15 79.5% #3 2,120 1 11 2000 19–21 47.5% #91 1,654 0 0
22 2009 78–17 82.1% #3 2,267 1 16 2001 27–21 56.2% #37 1,824 0 1
23 2010 56–18 75.7% #3 2,166 1 18 2002 27–27 50.0% #49 1,741 0 1
24 2011 72–6 92.3% #1 2,357 4 28 2003 27–23 54.0% #42 1,791 0 1
25 2012 71–10 87.7% #1 2,429 5 34 2004 33–22 60.0% #22 1,809 0 1
26 2013 67–9 88.2% #2 2,469 6 41 2005 50–23 68.5% #9 1,951 0 3
27 2014 65–8 89.0% #1 2,463 7 48 2006 55–19 74.3% #5 1,944 0 6
28 2015 82–6 93.2% #1 2,554 10 59 2007 43–22 66.2% #18 1,807 0 8
29 2016 64–8 88.9% #2 2,450 12 66 2008 20–19 51.3% #44 1,724 0 8
30 2017 31–8 79.5% #12 2,293 12 68 2009 32–23 58.2% #24 1,894 0 9
31 2018 53–12 81.5% #1 2,332 14 72 2010 26–19 57.8% #17 1,884 0 10
32 2019 55–11 83.3% #2 2,264 16 77 2011 25–19 56.8% #30 1,909 0 10
33 2020 35–5 87.5% #1 2,275 17 81 2012 3–6 33.3% #53 1,794 0 10
34 2021 46–5 90.2% #1 2,372 20 86
35 2022 42–6 87.5% #5 2,368 21 91
36 2023 54–6 90.0% #1 2,405 24 98
37 2024 29–9 76.3% #7 2,226 24 98
38 2025 39–11 78.0% #4 2,174 24 100
39 2026 15–5 75.0% #7 2,155 24 100