H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Novak Djokovic vs Jarkko Nieminen H2H: 6-1

Novak Djokovic holds a 6–1 lead over Jarkko Nieminen in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Novak Djokovic leads 3–0 on clay and 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Novak Djokovic won the 2015 Wimbledon second round 6-4 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Novak Djokovic
Serbia Age 39 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
6 – 1
7 main draw meetings
Jarkko Nieminen
FIN Age 44 Left-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 2, 2015* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Novak Djokovic #4 6-4 6-2 6-3 Jarkko Nieminen #92 Match data
May 26, 2015* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Novak Djokovic #1 6-2 7-5 6-2 Jarkko Nieminen #87 Match data
Apr 20, 2013* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 QF Clay Novak Djokovic #1 6-4 6-3 Jarkko Nieminen #49 Match data
Nov 5, 2010* Basel ATP 500 R16 Hard Novak Djokovic #3 6-4 7-6(6) Jarkko Nieminen #41 Match data
Jan 17, 2009* Sydney ATP 250 SF Hard Jarkko Nieminen #40 6-4 7-6(3) Novak Djokovic #3 Match data
May 18, 2007* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 R16 Clay Novak Djokovic #6 7-5 4-6 6-4 Jarkko Nieminen #23 Match data
Aug 16, 2006* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Novak Djokovic #24 7-6(5) 6-4 Jarkko Nieminen #15 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Novak Djokovic #7 #1 16,950 2,593 1,122 223 83.4% 24 40 7 14 15 100
Jarkko Nieminen #1,029 #13 1,700 1,917 357 334 51.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Novak Djokovic Jarkko Nieminen
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2004 1–3 25.0% #186 1,490 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2005 9–9 50.0% #78 1,732 0 0 2000 0–1 0.0% #308 1,494 0 0
19 2006 35–17 67.3% #16 1,884 0 2 2001 4–1 80.0% #61 1,608 0 0
20 2007 65–19 77.4% #3 2,067 0 7 2002 25–26 49.0% #40 1,703 0 0
21 2008 58–15 79.5% #3 2,120 1 11 2003 37–29 56.1% #36 1,728 0 0
22 2009 78–17 82.1% #3 2,267 1 16 2004 17–16 51.5% #77 1,696 0 0
23 2010 56–18 75.7% #3 2,166 1 18 2005 29–22 56.9% #28 1,797 0 0
24 2011 72–6 92.3% #1 2,357 4 28 2006 49–27 64.5% #15 1,789 0 1
25 2012 71–10 87.7% #1 2,429 5 34 2007 31–26 54.4% #27 1,814 0 1
26 2013 67–9 88.2% #2 2,469 6 41 2008 24–26 48.0% #37 1,758 0 1
27 2014 65–8 89.0% #1 2,463 7 48 2009 11–14 44.0% #88 1,712 0 1
28 2015 82–6 93.2% #1 2,554 10 59 2010 28–27 50.9% #39 1,873 0 1
29 2016 64–8 88.9% #2 2,450 12 66 2011 20–25 44.4% #77 1,830 0 1
30 2017 31–8 79.5% #12 2,293 12 68 2012 23–26 46.9% #41 1,744 0 2
31 2018 53–12 81.5% #1 2,332 14 72 2013 27–26 50.9% #39 1,789 0 2
32 2019 55–11 83.3% #2 2,264 16 77 2014 23–25 47.9% #73 1,767 0 2
33 2020 35–5 87.5% #1 2,275 17 81 2015 9–17 34.6% #153 1,692 0 2
34 2021 46–5 90.2% #1 2,372 20 86 — — — — — — —
35 2022 42–6 87.5% #5 2,368 21 91 — — — — — — —
36 2023 54–6 90.0% #1 2,405 24 98 — — — — — — —
37 2024 29–9 76.3% #7 2,226 24 98 — — — — — — —
38 2025 39–11 78.0% #4 2,174 24 100 — — — — — — —
39 2026 15–5 75.0% #7 2,155 24 100 — — — — — — —