H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Novak Djokovic vs Kyle Edmund H2H: 6-1

Novak Djokovic holds a 6–1 lead over Kyle Edmund in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Novak Djokovic leads 5–0 on hard courts, while Kyle Edmund leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Novak Djokovic won the 2020 US Open second round 6-7(5) 6-3 6-4 6-2.

Serbia Age 39 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
6 1
7 main draw meetings
Great Britain Age 31 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 3, 2020* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Novak Djokovic #4 6-7(5) 6-3 6-4 6-2 Kyle Edmund #44 Match data
Nov 1, 2019* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Novak Djokovic #1 7-6(7) 6-1 Kyle Edmund #75 Match data
Jul 8, 2018* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Novak Djokovic #21 4-6 6-3 6-2 6-4 Kyle Edmund #17 Match data
May 9, 2018* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Kyle Edmund #22 6-3 2-6 6-3 Novak Djokovic #12 Match data
Mar 12, 2017* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Novak Djokovic #2 6-4 7-6(5) Kyle Edmund #46 Match data
Sep 6, 2016* US Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Novak Djokovic #1 6-2 6-1 6-4 Kyle Edmund #84 Match data
Mar 26, 2016* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Novak Djokovic #1 6-3 6-3 Kyle Edmund #87 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Novak Djokovic #7 #1 16,950 2,593 1,122 223 83.4% 24 40 7 14 15 100
Kyle Edmund #703 #14 2,330 2,002 113 120 48.5% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Novak Djokovic Kyle Edmund
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2004 1–3 25.0% #186 1,490 0 0
18 2005 9–9 50.0% #78 1,732 0 0 2013 1–3 25.0% #376 1,509 0 0
19 2006 35–17 67.3% #16 1,884 0 2 2014 0–5 0.0% #194 1,473 0 0
20 2007 65–19 77.4% #3 2,067 0 7 2015 1–5 16.7% #102 1,580 0 0
21 2008 58–15 79.5% #3 2,120 1 11 2016 19–18 51.4% #45 1,891 0 0
22 2009 78–17 82.1% #3 2,267 1 16 2017 29–27 51.8% #50 1,877 0 0
23 2010 56–18 75.7% #3 2,166 1 18 2018 37–21 63.8% #14 1,958 0 1
24 2011 72–6 92.3% #1 2,357 4 28 2019 14–22 38.9% #69 1,772 0 1
25 2012 71–10 87.7% #1 2,429 5 34 2020 10–9 52.6% #48 1,765 0 2
26 2013 67–9 88.2% #2 2,469 6 41
27 2014 65–8 89.0% #1 2,463 7 48 2022 2–3 40.0% #581 1,736 0 2
28 2015 82–6 93.2% #1 2,554 10 59 2023 0–7 0.0% #538 1,654 0 2
29 2016 64–8 88.9% #2 2,450 12 66
30 2017 31–8 79.5% #12 2,293 12 68
31 2018 53–12 81.5% #1 2,332 14 72
32 2019 55–11 83.3% #2 2,264 16 77
33 2020 35–5 87.5% #1 2,275 17 81
34 2021 46–5 90.2% #1 2,372 20 86
35 2022 42–6 87.5% #5 2,368 21 91
36 2023 54–6 90.0% #1 2,405 24 98
37 2024 29–9 76.3% #7 2,226 24 98
38 2025 39–11 78.0% #4 2,174 24 100
39 2026 15–5 75.0% #7 2,155 24 100