H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Novak Djokovic vs Kyle Edmund H2H: 6-1

Novak Djokovic holds a 6–1 lead over Kyle Edmund in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Novak Djokovic leads 5–0 on hard courts, while Kyle Edmund leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Novak Djokovic won the 2020 US Open second round 6-7(5) 6-3 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Novak Djokovic
Serbia Age 39 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
6 – 1
7 main draw meetings
Kyle Edmund
Great Britain Age 31 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Novak Djokovic #1 6-7(5) 6-3 6-4 6-2 Kyle Edmund #44 Match data Sep 3, 2020* R64 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Novak Djokovic #1 7-6(7) 6-1 Kyle Edmund #75 Match data Nov 1, 2019* R16 Paris Masters Masters 1000 Hard
Novak Djokovic #21 4-6 6-3 6-2 6-4 Kyle Edmund #17 Match data Jul 8, 2018* R32 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Kyle Edmund #22 6-3 2-6 6-3 Novak Djokovic #12 Match data May 9, 2018* R32 Madrid Open Masters 1000 Clay
Novak Djokovic #2 6-4 7-6(5) Kyle Edmund #46 Match data Mar 12, 2017* R64 Indian Wells Open Masters 1000 Hard
Novak Djokovic #1 6-2 6-1 6-4 Kyle Edmund #84 Match data Sep 6, 2016* R16 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Novak Djokovic #1 6-3 6-3 Kyle Edmund #87 Match data Mar 26, 2016* R64 Miami Open Masters 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS Olympics 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Novak Djokovic #5 #1 16,950 2,593 1,141 231 83.2% 24 1 40 7 15 14 101
Kyle Edmund #703 #14 2,330 2,001 114 121 48.5% 0 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Novak Djokovic Kyle Edmund
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2004 1–3 25.0% #186 1,490 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2005 9–9 50.0% #78 1,733 0 0 2013 1–3 25.0% #376 1,509 0 0
19 2006 35–17 67.3% #16 1,884 0 2 2014 0–5 0.0% #194 1,473 0 0
20 2007 65–19 77.4% #3 2,068 0 7 2015 1–5 16.7% #102 1,587 0 0
21 2008 63–16 79.7% #3 2,130 1 11 2016 20–19 51.3% #45 1,882 0 0
22 2009 78–17 82.1% #3 2,273 1 16 2017 29–27 51.8% #50 1,875 0 0
23 2010 56–18 75.7% #3 2,163 1 18 2018 37–21 63.8% #14 1,952 0 1
24 2011 72–6 92.3% #1 2,382 4 28 2019 14–22 38.9% #69 1,769 0 1
25 2012 75–12 86.2% #1 2,425 5 34 2020 10–9 52.6% #48 1,763 0 2
26 2013 67–9 88.2% #2 2,471 6 41 — — — — — — —
27 2014 65–8 89.0% #1 2,450 7 48 2022 2–3 40.0% #581 1,735 0 2
28 2015 82–6 93.2% #1 2,554 10 59 2023 0–7 0.0% #538 1,653 0 2
29 2016 64–9 87.7% #2 2,429 12 66 — — — — — — —
30 2017 31–8 79.5% #12 2,281 12 68 — — — — — — —
31 2018 53–12 81.5% #1 2,332 14 72 — — — — — — —
32 2019 55–11 83.3% #2 2,262 16 77 — — — — — — —
33 2020 35–5 87.5% #1 2,277 17 81 — — — — — — —
34 2021 50–7 87.7% #1 2,339 20 86 — — — — — — —
35 2022 42–6 87.5% #5 2,353 21 91 — — — — — — —
36 2023 54–6 90.0% #1 2,402 24 98 — — — — — — —
37 2024 35–9 79.5% #7 2,273 24 99 — — — — — — —
38 2025 39–11 78.0% #4 2,191 24 101 — — — — — — —
39 2026 15–7 68.2% #5 2,094 24 101 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Novak Djokovic Kyle Edmund
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2004 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2005 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 2013 — — — — — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
19 2006 14 8 22 63.6% 14 5 19 73.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 2014 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
20 2007 43 12 55 78.2% 16 5 21 76.2% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2015 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
21 2008 42 11 53 79.2% 16 3 19 84.2% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2016 14 12 26 53.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
22 2009 53 11 64 82.8% 17 4 21 81.0% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — — 2017 22 18 40 55.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
23 2010 40 12 52 76.9% 10 4 14 71.4% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2018 21 12 33 63.6% 12 6 18 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
24 2011 46 5 51 90.2% 19 1 20 95.0% 7 0 7 100.0% — — — — 2019 9 13 22 40.9% 2 6 8 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
25 2012 50 5 55 90.9% 16 4 20 80.0% 9 3 12 75.0% — — — — 2020 10 8 18 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
26 2013 49 5 54 90.7% 12 3 15 80.0% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2014 44 6 50 88.0% 14 2 16 87.5% 7 0 7 100.0% — — — — 2022 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2015 59 5 64 92.2% 16 1 17 94.1% 7 0 7 100.0% — — — — 2023 0 4 4 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
29 2016 46 6 52 88.5% 16 2 18 88.9% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2017 10 3 13 76.9% 13 4 17 76.5% 8 1 9 88.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2018 31 6 37 83.8% 11 5 16 68.8% 11 1 12 91.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2019 32 8 40 80.0% 16 3 19 84.2% 7 0 7 100.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2020 24 4 28 85.7% 11 1 12 91.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2021 25 4 29 86.2% 18 3 21 85.7% 7 0 7 100.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2022 20 2 22 90.9% 15 4 19 78.9% 7 0 7 100.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2023 36 2 38 94.7% 12 3 15 80.0% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2024 13 4 17 76.5% 16 4 20 80.0% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2025 25 7 32 78.1% 9 3 12 75.0% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2026 8 4 12 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 712 134 846 84.2% 292 71 363 80.4% 131 22 153 85.6% 6 4 10 60.0% — 78 75 153 51.0% 24 27 51 47.1% 12 19 31 38.7% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 1,324/1,372 of Novak Djokovic's and 230/235 of Kyle Edmund's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Novak Djokovic Kyle Edmund
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2004 4/4 6.5 5.3 62.5% 59.7% 42.5% 44.3% 38.4% 53.1% 41.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2005 18/18 4.9 3.2 63.1% 69.1% 48.2% 60.2% 44.6% 61.2% 37.8% 2013 4/4 4.5 2.0 64.2% 73.6% 51.0% 74.3% 14.3% 65.6% 31.0%
19 2006 52/52 5.5 3.0 63.0% 72.3% 53.1% 59.7% 49.3% 65.1% 40.0% 2014 5/5 5.6 2.8 61.2% 68.8% 43.4% 53.2% 11.3% 59.5% 28.3%
20 2007 83/84 6.2 2.3 64.2% 73.1% 54.5% 64.7% 44.4% 66.4% 41.0% 2015 5/6 5.2 2.8 57.8% 62.5% 47.8% 52.4% 25.3% 56.6% 32.3%
21 2008 73/79 6.3 2.0 64.7% 74.2% 58.0% 67.4% 50.9% 68.6% 42.6% 2016 36/39 6.2 2.9 59.3% 71.8% 51.0% 57.8% 44.0% 63.3% 35.1%
22 2009 95/95 5.3 2.8 63.1% 73.3% 54.3% 63.6% 43.6% 66.3% 42.5% 2017 56/56 5.6 2.9 58.3% 74.7% 54.1% 61.2% 42.6% 65.9% 37.6%
23 2010 72/74 4.2 3.9 64.0% 71.6% 54.0% 65.8% 48.0% 65.2% 42.4% 2018 57/58 6.9 2.5 59.6% 75.7% 54.5% 66.1% 40.8% 67.3% 37.9%
24 2011 75/78 4.6 1.9 65.5% 74.8% 57.2% 63.6% 51.1% 68.6% 46.2% 2019 36/36 5.1 2.1 62.2% 72.0% 52.5% 51.4% 42.8% 64.7% 34.1%
25 2012 81/87 5.6 1.8 64.5% 75.7% 56.9% 65.1% 50.8% 69.1% 44.0% 2020 19/19 5.7 2.7 61.2% 74.4% 50.2% 68.7% 36.6% 65.0% 38.0%
26 2013 76/76 6.3 1.6 65.8% 76.3% 62.2% 64.6% 45.0% 71.3% 44.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2014 69/73 6.2 1.5 67.0% 75.5% 57.5% 60.3% 47.7% 69.6% 44.3% 2022 5/5 7.2 3.4 53.3% 73.2% 39.8% 65.6% 63.3% 57.5% 33.7%
28 2015 87/88 5.4 1.6 66.7% 75.4% 61.4% 62.8% 48.1% 70.7% 44.3% 2023 7/7 3.7 3.3 56.8% 63.2% 43.7% 33.7% 31.7% 54.4% 25.2%
29 2016 71/73 3.8 2.4 64.8% 75.0% 57.4% 62.1% 49.2% 68.6% 44.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2017 38/39 4.1 1.9 66.8% 73.4% 53.8% 61.4% 47.9% 66.8% 41.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2018 65/65 5.3 2.3 66.4% 75.5% 58.1% 64.1% 45.1% 69.7% 42.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2019 65/66 5.7 2.6 66.1% 77.4% 59.4% 63.1% 53.6% 71.3% 42.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2020 40/40 6.1 2.8 64.1% 75.9% 53.8% 64.3% 43.4% 67.9% 44.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2021 50/57 8.3 2.7 64.8% 76.7% 54.6% 59.4% 48.3% 68.9% 44.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2022 47/48 6.0 1.9 65.8% 78.5% 58.2% 59.4% 46.9% 71.7% 41.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2023 60/60 7.2 2.9 63.5% 78.0% 57.9% 60.8% 45.3% 70.7% 41.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2024 36/44 7.3 2.7 63.8% 76.0% 56.7% 61.5% 43.5% 69.1% 41.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2025 46/50 8.2 2.1 67.2% 76.8% 55.8% 53.0% 47.1% 69.9% 39.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
39 2026 21/22 8.8 3.5 68.2% 74.6% 54.0% 64.4% 39.0% 67.8% 36.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Novak Djokovic Kyle Edmund
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2004 1491 107.5 -0.98 -0.85 0.885 47.7% — +57 — 36.4% -0.91 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — +0.01 2012 1500 100.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2005 1733 128.8 -0.13 +0.84 0.974 49.7% -92 -124 -27 51.0% -0.14 2–2 (50%) 8–2 (80%) — -0.77 2013 1510 104.9 -0.84 -2.06 0.901 48.3% — — +57 22.2% -1.22 — 0–3 (0%) — -0.13
19 2006 1885 144.3 +2.58 +1.86 1.145 52.6% -115 -18 -101 63.6% +0.85 10–6 (63%) 14–5 (74%) — +0.06 2014 1474 106.7 -2.93 -2.24 0.699 44.8% +38 — — 8.3% -2.50 0–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.07
20 2007 2069 168.7 +4.20 +4.63 1.219 53.6% -9 -83 -156 70.3% +1.30 18–6 (75%) 28–13 (68%) — -0.04 2015 1587 116.6 -3.20 -1.53 0.745 45.0% — — — 20.0% -1.60 1–0 0–3 (0%) — +0.23
21 2008 2130 172.3 +5.71 +7.08 1.355 55.3% +34 +15 -166 75.3% +1.68 8–6 (57%) 18–12 (60%) — -1.51 2016 1883 152.7 +0.52 -0.61 0.956 49.6% -23 -173 -355 51.6% -0.02 6–6 (50%) 12–4 (75%) — -0.63
22 2009 2274 175.6 +3.72 +6.70 1.260 54.2% +35 -48 -230 74.9% +1.62 18–4 (82%) 19–15 (56%) — +2.04 2017 1876 157.4 +2.08 +1.53 1.102 51.8% +2 -87 -353 56.3% +0.53 7–18 (28%) 13–13 (50%) — -0.39
23 2010 2163 172.7 +2.60 +6.48 1.220 53.7% +62 0 -55 71.1% +1.38 9–7 (56%) 11–8 (58%) — +0.94 2018 1952 158.9 +3.43 +1.57 1.159 52.4% -10 -74 -299 60.5% +0.60 9–10 (47%) 14–11 (56%) — -0.07
24 2011 2383 182.8 +6.53 +9.98 1.473 57.2% +13 -31 -72 82.9% +2.35 14–2 (88%) 8–7 (53%) — -1.11 2019 1770 148.4 +0.75 -0.44 0.966 49.4% +37 +36 -119 44.3% -0.26 3–7 (30%) 1–10 (9%) — -0.60
25 2012 2426 182.4 +6.77 +8.20 1.427 56.2% +70 -20 -80 77.8% +2.07 16–3 (84%) 17–12 (59%) — -2.53 2020 1764 146.7 +0.91 +1.13 1.084 51.3% +37 — — 52.1% +0.27 2–3 (40%) 3–7 (30%) — -0.14
26 2013 2471 184.6 +8.33 +8.48 1.555 57.0% +86 -60 -72 79.4% +2.09 15–6 (71%) 19–9 (68%) — -1.97 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2014 2451 184.1 +6.63 +9.04 1.457 56.5% +45 +29 +72 78.4% +2.05 15–2 (88%) 13–10 (57%) — -1.15 2022 1735 110.8 -1.90 +0.25 0.792 45.8% +26 — — 36.4% -1.09 — 1–1 — +0.12
28 2015 2554 186.4 +7.05 +9.59 1.509 56.9% +60 +29 +50 83.8% +2.33 16–2 (89%) 17–9 (65%) — +0.06 2023 1653 115.8 -3.22 -3.72 0.554 40.8% +59 +68 — 6.3% -2.75 0–1 0–1 — -1.04
29 2016 2430 183.4 +5.55 +8.54 1.418 56.0% +83 +151 +115 81.8% +2.05 8–1 (89%) 19–7 (73%) — -0.65 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2017 2281 169.1 +3.30 +4.52 1.236 53.9% +127 +161 +137 73.4% +1.50 8–2 (80%) 10–5 (67%) — -0.74 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2018 2333 175.5 +5.76 +7.04 1.406 55.3% +44 +2 +149 76.3% +1.72 8–6 (57%) 15–9 (63%) — -1.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2019 2263 174.5 +6.82 +6.86 1.476 56.3% 0 +80 +290 80.5% +2.00 7–8 (47%) 15–5 (75%) — -0.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2020 2277 174.3 +4.76 +6.66 1.375 55.6% -19 +74 — 81.3% +1.93 6–1 (86%) 11–2 (85%) — -1.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2021 2339 175.3 +5.82 +8.26 1.443 56.3% +2 +113 +292 77.0% +1.99 9–5 (64%) 12–9 (57%) — -2.44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2022 2354 170.3 +7.26 +6.21 1.481 56.1% +24 +57 +322 80.0% +1.83 6–4 (60%) 18–4 (82%) — -0.84 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2023 2402 174.8 +7.28 +6.22 1.422 55.5% +78 +9 +271 82.1% +1.97 11–4 (73%) 31–8 (79%) — -1.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2024 2273 164.2 +4.66 +5.21 1.354 54.9% +76 +122 +363 74.1% +1.59 4–3 (57%) 13–5 (72%) — -0.71 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2025 2192 161.5 +5.25 +3.10 1.297 54.3% +52 +120 +371 72.3% +1.53 5–1 (83%) 11–13 (46%) — -1.44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2026 2095 144.5 +2.71 +1.71 1.124 51.9% +65 +133 +377 61.0% +0.65 4–5 (44%) 5–4 (56%) — -1.84 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2594 180.7 +5.47 +6.81 1.362 55.3% +38 +32 +76 76.2% +1.76 218–88 (71%) 332–174 (66%) 107.4 -1.42 — 2002 155.4 +1.34 +0.47 1.016 50.4% +7 -64 -227 50.3% +0.06 28–46 (38%) 45–55 (45%) 88.6 -1.17

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.