H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Novak Djokovic vs Lleyton Hewitt H2H: 5-1

Novak Djokovic holds a 5–1 lead over Lleyton Hewitt in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Novak Djokovic leads 3–0 on grass and 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Novak Djokovic won the 2012 Australian Open fourth round 6-1 6-3 4-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Novak Djokovic
Serbia Age 39 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
5 – 1
6 main draw meetings
Lleyton Hewitt
AUS Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 24, 2012* Australian Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Novak Djokovic #1 6-1 6-3 4-6 6-3 Lleyton Hewitt #181 Match data
Jun 29, 2010* Wimbledon Grand Slam R16 Grass Novak Djokovic #3 7-5 6-4 3-6 6-4 Lleyton Hewitt #26 Match data
Jun 14, 2008* Queen's Club ATP 500 QF Grass Novak Djokovic #3 6-2 6-2 Lleyton Hewitt #30 Match data
Jan 22, 2008* Australian Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Novak Djokovic #3 7-5 6-3 6-3 Lleyton Hewitt #22 Match data
Jul 3, 2007* Wimbledon Grand Slam R16 Grass Novak Djokovic #5 7-6(8) 7-6(2) 4-6 7-6(5) Lleyton Hewitt #19 Match data
Sep 3, 2006* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Lleyton Hewitt #17 6-3 6-1 6-2 Novak Djokovic #23 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Novak Djokovic #7 #1 16,950 2,593 1,122 223 83.4% 24 40 7 14 15 100
Lleyton Hewitt #636 #1 5,205 2,159 564 241 70.1% 2 2 2 1 23 30

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Novak Djokovic Lleyton Hewitt
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1997 0–1 0.0% #550 1,492 0 0
17 2004 1–3 25.0% #186 1,490 0 0 1998 10–9 52.6% #100 1,614 0 1
18 2005 9–9 50.0% #78 1,732 0 0 1999 40–18 69.0% #25 1,853 0 2
19 2006 35–17 67.3% #16 1,884 0 2 2000 53–15 77.9% #7 1,993 0 6
20 2007 65–19 77.4% #3 2,067 0 7 2001 71–15 82.6% #1 2,116 1 12
21 2008 58–15 79.5% #3 2,120 1 11 2002 61–16 79.2% #1 2,062 2 17
22 2009 78–17 82.1% #3 2,267 1 16 2003 29–10 74.4% #17 1,939 2 19
23 2010 56–18 75.7% #3 2,166 1 18 2004 64–16 80.0% #3 2,076 2 23
24 2011 72–6 92.3% #1 2,357 4 28 2005 36–9 80.0% #4 2,092 2 24
25 2012 71–10 87.7% #1 2,429 5 34 2006 32–14 69.6% #20 1,964 2 25
26 2013 67–9 88.2% #2 2,469 6 41 2007 34–15 69.4% #21 1,925 2 26
27 2014 65–8 89.0% #1 2,463 7 48 2008 17–10 63.0% #67 1,936 2 26
28 2015 82–6 93.2% #1 2,554 10 59 2009 33–19 63.5% #22 1,956 2 27
29 2016 64–8 88.9% #2 2,450 12 66 2010 18–11 62.1% #54 1,907 2 28
30 2017 31–8 79.5% #12 2,293 12 68 2011 8–9 47.1% #186 1,817 2 28
31 2018 53–12 81.5% #1 2,332 14 72 2012 13–11 54.2% #83 1,867 2 28
32 2019 55–11 83.3% #2 2,264 16 77 2013 22–18 55.0% #60 1,884 2 28
33 2020 35–5 87.5% #1 2,275 17 81 2014 19–15 55.9% #50 1,841 2 30
34 2021 46–5 90.2% #1 2,372 20 86 2015 3–9 25.0% #307 1,715 2 30
35 2022 42–6 87.5% #5 2,368 21 91 2016 1–1 50.0% #633 1,727 2 30
36 2023 54–6 90.0% #1 2,405 24 98 — — — — — — —
37 2024 29–9 76.3% #7 2,226 24 98 — — — — — — —
38 2025 39–11 78.0% #4 2,174 24 100 — — — — — — —
39 2026 15–5 75.0% #7 2,155 24 100 — — — — — — —