H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Novak Djokovic vs Marcos Baghdatis H2H: 8-0

Novak Djokovic holds a 8–0 lead over Marcos Baghdatis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Novak Djokovic leads 5–0 on hard courts and 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Novak Djokovic won the 2015 Indian Wells Masters second round 6-1 6-3.

Serbia Age 39 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
8 0
8 main draw meetings
CYP Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 15, 2015* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Novak Djokovic #1 6-1 6-3 Marcos Baghdatis #61 Match data
Mar 24, 2012* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Novak Djokovic #1 6-4 6-4 Marcos Baghdatis #42 Match data
Nov 5, 2011* Basel ATP 500 QF Hard Novak Djokovic #1 2-6 6-2 6-3 Marcos Baghdatis #59 Match data
Jun 26, 2011* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Novak Djokovic #2 6-4 4-6 6-3 6-4 Marcos Baghdatis #30 Match data
Feb 27, 2010* Dubai ATP 500 SF Hard Novak Djokovic #2 6-7(2) 6-3 6-4 Marcos Baghdatis #37 Match data
Jan 27, 2009* Australian Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Novak Djokovic #3 6-1 7-6(1) 6-7(5) 6-2 Marcos Baghdatis #97 Match data
Jul 5, 2007* Wimbledon Grand Slam QF Grass Novak Djokovic #5 7-6(4) 7-6(9) 6-7(3) 4-6 7-5 Marcos Baghdatis #16 Match data
May 11, 2007* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R16 Clay Novak Djokovic #5 6-2 7-5 Marcos Baghdatis #18 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Novak Djokovic #7 #1 16,950 2,593 1,122 223 83.4% 24 40 7 14 15 100
Marcos Baghdatis #179 #8 2,111 1,952 324 272 54.4% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Novak Djokovic Marcos Baghdatis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2004 1–3 25.0% #186 1,490 0 0
18 2005 9–9 50.0% #78 1,732 0 0
19 2006 35–17 67.3% #16 1,884 0 2 2004 1–1 50.0% #159 1,559 0 0
20 2007 65–19 77.4% #3 2,067 0 7 2005 11–12 47.8% #55 1,694 0 0
21 2008 58–15 79.5% #3 2,120 1 11 2006 33–20 62.3% #12 1,842 0 1
22 2009 78–17 82.1% #3 2,267 1 16 2007 44–22 66.7% #16 1,937 0 2
23 2010 56–18 75.7% #3 2,166 1 18 2008 12–12 50.0% #98 1,815 0 2
24 2011 72–6 92.3% #1 2,357 4 28 2009 18–16 52.9% #42 1,810 0 3
25 2012 71–10 87.7% #1 2,429 5 34 2010 41–27 60.3% #20 1,852 0 4
26 2013 67–9 88.2% #2 2,469 6 41 2011 26–27 49.1% #44 1,844 0 4
27 2014 65–8 89.0% #1 2,463 7 48 2012 31–24 56.4% #36 1,897 0 4
28 2015 82–6 93.2% #1 2,554 10 59 2013 14–22 38.9% #87 1,804 0 4
29 2016 64–8 88.9% #2 2,450 12 66 2014 7–11 38.9% #85 1,703 0 4
30 2017 31–8 79.5% #12 2,293 12 68 2015 26–19 57.8% #46 1,869 0 4
31 2018 53–12 81.5% #1 2,332 14 72 2016 26–23 53.1% #36 1,884 0 4
32 2019 55–11 83.3% #2 2,264 16 77 2017 18–16 52.9% #102 1,839 0 4
33 2020 35–5 87.5% #1 2,275 17 81 2018 12–17 41.4% #124 1,723 0 4
34 2021 46–5 90.2% #1 2,372 20 86 2019 4–3 57.1% #179 1,740 0 4
35 2022 42–6 87.5% #5 2,368 21 91
36 2023 54–6 90.0% #1 2,405 24 98
37 2024 29–9 76.3% #7 2,226 24 98
38 2025 39–11 78.0% #4 2,174 24 100
39 2026 15–5 75.0% #7 2,155 24 100