H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Novak Djokovic vs Mikhail Youzhny H2H: 7-3
Novak Djokovic holds a 7–3 lead over Mikhail Youzhny in their ATP head-to-head. Across 10 main-draw meetings, Novak Djokovic leads 5–3 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Novak Djokovic won the 2016 US Open third round 4-2 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Serbia
Age 39
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
7
–
3
10 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 44
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 4, 2016* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 4-2 (ret.) | Mikhail Youzhny | Match data |
| Feb 28, 2014* | Dubai | ATP 500 | QF | Hard | Novak Djokovic | (w/o) | Mikhail Youzhny | Match data |
| Sep 5, 2013* | US Open | Grand Slam | QF | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 6-3 6-2 3-6 6-0 | Mikhail Youzhny | Match data |
| Apr 17, 2013* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Novak Djokovic | 4-6 6-1 6-4 | Mikhail Youzhny | Match data |
| Feb 27, 2010* | Dubai | ATP 500 | F | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 7-5 5-7 6-3 | Mikhail Youzhny | Match data |
| Feb 13, 2010* | Rotterdam | ATP 500 | SF | Hard | Mikhail Youzhny | 7-6(5) 7-6(6) | Novak Djokovic | Match data |
| Aug 14, 2009* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 6-3 6-4 | Mikhail Youzhny | Match data |
| Feb 24, 2007* | Rotterdam | ATP 500 | SF | Hard | Mikhail Youzhny | 3-6 7-6(7) 7-5 | Novak Djokovic | Match data |
| Feb 15, 2007* | Marseille | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Mikhail Youzhny | 6-4 4-6 7-6 | Novak Djokovic | Match data |
| Jul 2, 2006* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Novak Djokovic | 4-6 6-2 6-3 6-3 | Mikhail Youzhny | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Novak Djokovic | #7 | #1 | 16,950 | 2,593 | 1,122 | 223 | 83.4% | 24 | 40 | 7 | 14 | 15 | 100 |
| Mikhail Youzhny | #115 | #8 | 3,500 | 2,069 | 477 | 405 | 54.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Novak Djokovic | Mikhail Youzhny | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2004 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #186 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #286 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2005 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #78 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #113 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2006 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #16 | 1,884 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #58 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2007 | 65–19 | 77.4% | #3 | 2,067 | 0 | 7 | 2002 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #32 | 1,866 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2008 | 58–15 | 79.5% | #3 | 2,120 | 1 | 11 | 2003 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #43 | 1,746 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2009 | 78–17 | 82.1% | #3 | 2,267 | 1 | 16 | 2004 | 38–25 | 60.3% | #16 | 1,870 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2010 | 56–18 | 75.7% | #3 | 2,166 | 1 | 18 | 2005 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #43 | 1,758 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2011 | 72–6 | 92.3% | #1 | 2,357 | 4 | 28 | 2006 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #24 | 1,803 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2012 | 71–10 | 87.7% | #1 | 2,429 | 5 | 34 | 2007 | 48–24 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,880 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2013 | 67–9 | 88.2% | #2 | 2,469 | 6 | 41 | 2008 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #32 | 1,761 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 2014 | 65–8 | 89.0% | #1 | 2,463 | 7 | 48 | 2009 | 41–27 | 60.3% | #19 | 1,960 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 2015 | 82–6 | 93.2% | #1 | 2,554 | 10 | 59 | 2010 | 40–19 | 67.8% | #10 | 1,936 | 0 | 7 |
| 29 | 2016 | 64–8 | 88.9% | #2 | 2,450 | 12 | 66 | 2011 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #35 | 1,837 | 0 | 7 |
| 30 | 2017 | 31–8 | 79.5% | #12 | 2,293 | 12 | 68 | 2012 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #25 | 1,902 | 0 | 8 |
| 31 | 2018 | 53–12 | 81.5% | #1 | 2,332 | 14 | 72 | 2013 | 39–24 | 61.9% | #15 | 2,016 | 0 | 10 |
| 32 | 2019 | 55–11 | 83.3% | #2 | 2,264 | 16 | 77 | 2014 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #48 | 1,795 | 0 | 10 |
| 33 | 2020 | 35–5 | 87.5% | #1 | 2,275 | 17 | 81 | 2015 | 9–24 | 27.3% | #127 | 1,701 | 0 | 10 |
| 34 | 2021 | 46–5 | 90.2% | #1 | 2,372 | 20 | 86 | 2016 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #57 | 1,774 | 0 | 10 |
| 35 | 2022 | 42–6 | 87.5% | #5 | 2,368 | 21 | 91 | 2017 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #84 | 1,679 | 0 | 10 |
| 36 | 2023 | 54–6 | 90.0% | #1 | 2,405 | 24 | 98 | 2018 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #115 | 1,637 | 0 | 10 |
| 37 | 2024 | 29–9 | 76.3% | #7 | 2,226 | 24 | 98 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2025 | 39–11 | 78.0% | #4 | 2,174 | 24 | 100 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 2026 | 15–5 | 75.0% | #7 | 2,155 | 24 | 100 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |