H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Novak Djokovic vs Nicolas Almagro H2H: 5-0

Novak Djokovic holds a 5–0 lead over Nicolas Almagro in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Novak Djokovic leads 3–0 on clay and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Novak Djokovic won the 2017 Madrid Masters third round 6-1 4-6 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Novak Djokovic
Serbia Age 39 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
5 – 0
5 main draw meetings
Nicolas Almagro
ESP Age 40 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 10, 2017* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Novak Djokovic #2 6-1 4-6 7-5 Nicolas Almagro #76 Match data
May 13, 2015* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Novak Djokovic #1 6-1 6-7(5) 6-3 Nicolas Almagro #174 Match data
Mar 16, 2012* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 QF Hard Novak Djokovic #1 6-3 6-4 Nicolas Almagro #12 Match data
Jan 25, 2011* Australian Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Novak Djokovic #3 6-3 6-4 6-0 Nicolas Almagro #14 Match data
May 10, 2008* Rome Masters Masters 1000 QF Clay Novak Djokovic #3 6-1 1-0 (ret.) Nicolas Almagro #21 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Novak Djokovic #7 #1 16,950 2,593 1,122 223 83.4% 24 40 7 14 15 100
Nicolas Almagro #846 #9 2,735 2,076 385 272 58.6% 0 0 0 2 11 13

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Novak Djokovic Nicolas Almagro
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2004 1–3 25.0% #186 1,490 0 0 2003 1–1 50.0% #156 1,511 0 0
18 2005 9–9 50.0% #78 1,732 0 0 2004 2–7 22.2% #103 1,539 0 0
19 2006 35–17 67.3% #16 1,884 0 2 2005 13–22 37.1% #114 1,551 0 0
20 2007 65–19 77.4% #3 2,067 0 7 2006 27–20 57.4% #32 1,721 0 1
21 2008 58–15 79.5% #3 2,120 1 11 2007 32–27 54.2% #28 1,723 0 2
22 2009 78–17 82.1% #3 2,267 1 16 2008 34–16 68.0% #18 1,794 0 4
23 2010 56–18 75.7% #3 2,166 1 18 2009 30–24 55.6% #26 1,831 0 5
24 2011 72–6 92.3% #1 2,357 4 28 2010 41–23 64.1% #15 1,885 0 7
25 2012 71–10 87.7% #1 2,429 5 34 2011 47–23 67.1% #10 1,874 0 10
26 2013 67–9 88.2% #2 2,469 6 41 2012 51–21 70.8% #11 2,010 0 12
27 2014 65–8 89.0% #1 2,463 7 48 2013 42–23 64.6% #13 1,961 0 12
28 2015 82–6 93.2% #1 2,554 10 59 2014 15–10 60.0% #71 1,928 0 12
29 2016 64–8 88.9% #2 2,450 12 66 2015 18–20 47.4% #73 1,795 0 12
30 2017 31–8 79.5% #12 2,293 12 68 2016 22–22 50.0% #44 1,790 0 13
31 2018 53–12 81.5% #1 2,332 14 72 2017 10–12 45.5% #151 1,833 0 13
32 2019 55–11 83.3% #2 2,264 16 77 2018 0–1 0.0% #846 1,777 0 13
33 2020 35–5 87.5% #1 2,275 17 81 — — — — — — —
34 2021 46–5 90.2% #1 2,372 20 86 — — — — — — —
35 2022 42–6 87.5% #5 2,368 21 91 — — — — — — —
36 2023 54–6 90.0% #1 2,405 24 98 — — — — — — —
37 2024 29–9 76.3% #7 2,226 24 98 — — — — — — —
38 2025 39–11 78.0% #4 2,174 24 100 — — — — — — —
39 2026 15–5 75.0% #7 2,155 24 100 — — — — — — —