H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC

Novak Djokovic vs Nikolay Davydenko H2H: 6-1

Novak Djokovic holds a 6–1 lead over Nikolay Davydenko in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Novak Djokovic leads 6–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Novak Djokovic won the 2012 Cincinnati Masters fourth round 6-0 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Novak Djokovic
Serbia Age 39 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
6 – 1
7 main draw meetings
Nikolay Davydenko
RUS Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 17, 2012* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Novak Djokovic #2 6-0 (ret.) Nikolay Davydenko #50 Match data
Sep 4, 2011* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Novak Djokovic #4 6-3 6-4 6-2 Nikolay Davydenko #39 Match data
Aug 11, 2011* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Novak Djokovic #1 7-5 6-1 Nikolay Davydenko #30 Match data
Nov 22, 2009 Tour Finals ATP Finals RR Hard Novak Djokovic #3 3-6 6-4 7-5 Nikolay Davydenko #7 Match data
Oct 17, 2009* Shanghai Masters Masters 1000 SF Hard Nikolay Davydenko #8 4-6 6-4 7-6(1) Novak Djokovic #4 Match data
Nov 17, 2008* Masters Cup ATP Finals F Hard Novak Djokovic #3 6-1 7-5 Nikolay Davydenko #5 Match data
Nov 9, 2008 Masters Cup ATP Finals RR Hard Novak Djokovic #3 7-6(3) 0-6 7-5 Nikolay Davydenko #5 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Novak Djokovic #7 #1 16,950 2,593 1,122 223 83.4% 24 40 7 14 15 100
Nikolay Davydenko #248 #3 5,335 2,213 467 324 59.0% 0 3 1 1 16 21

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Novak Djokovic Nikolay Davydenko
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2004 1–3 25.0% #186 1,490 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2005 9–9 50.0% #78 1,732 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2006 35–17 67.3% #16 1,884 0 2 2000 3–1 75.0% #133 1,544 0 0
20 2007 65–19 77.4% #3 2,067 0 7 2001 6–15 28.6% #79 1,568 0 0
21 2008 58–15 79.5% #3 2,120 1 11 2002 12–24 33.3% #81 1,601 0 0
22 2009 78–17 82.1% #3 2,267 1 16 2003 29–30 49.2% #44 1,595 0 2
23 2010 56–18 75.7% #3 2,166 1 18 2004 32–28 53.3% #28 1,758 0 4
24 2011 72–6 92.3% #1 2,357 4 28 2005 52–29 64.2% #5 1,868 0 5
25 2012 71–10 87.7% #1 2,429 5 34 2006 67–28 70.5% #3 1,971 0 10
26 2013 67–9 88.2% #2 2,469 6 41 2007 53–30 63.9% #4 1,935 0 11
27 2014 65–8 89.0% #1 2,463 7 48 2008 51–20 71.8% #5 1,974 0 14
28 2015 82–6 93.2% #1 2,554 10 59 2009 57–19 75.0% #6 2,142 0 19
29 2016 64–8 88.9% #2 2,450 12 66 2010 29–19 60.4% #22 1,897 0 20
30 2017 31–8 79.5% #12 2,293 12 68 2011 26–25 51.0% #41 1,848 0 21
31 2018 53–12 81.5% #1 2,332 14 72 2012 23–24 48.9% #44 1,824 0 21
32 2019 55–11 83.3% #2 2,264 16 77 2013 22–22 50.0% #53 1,824 0 21
33 2020 35–5 87.5% #1 2,275 17 81 2014 5–10 33.3% #250 1,730 0 21
34 2021 46–5 90.2% #1 2,372 20 86 — — — — — — —
35 2022 42–6 87.5% #5 2,368 21 91 — — — — — — —
36 2023 54–6 90.0% #1 2,405 24 98 — — — — — — —
37 2024 29–9 76.3% #7 2,226 24 98 — — — — — — —
38 2025 39–11 78.0% #4 2,174 24 100 — — — — — — —
39 2026 15–5 75.0% #7 2,155 24 100 — — — — — — —