H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Novak Djokovic vs Radek Stepanek H2H: 12-1
Novak Djokovic holds a 12–1 lead over Radek Stepanek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 13 main-draw meetings, Novak Djokovic leads 7–1 on hard courts and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Novak Djokovic won the 2017 Doha quarterfinal 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Serbia
Age 39
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
12
–
1
13 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 47
Right-Handed
186 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 6, 2017* | Doha | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 6-3 6-3 | Radek Stepanek | Match data |
| Jul 29, 2016* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 6-2 6-4 | Radek Stepanek | Match data |
| Jun 26, 2014* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Novak Djokovic | 6-4 6-3 6-7(5) 7-6(5) | Radek Stepanek | Match data |
| May 14, 2014* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Novak Djokovic | 6-3 7-5 | Radek Stepanek | Match data |
| Jan 20, 2013* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 6-4 6-3 7-5 | Radek Stepanek | Match data |
| Jul 1, 2012* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Novak Djokovic | 4-6 6-2 6-2 6-2 | Radek Stepanek | Match data |
| Aug 19, 2011* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 6-3 6-3 | Radek Stepanek | Match data |
| Nov 7, 2009* | Basel | ATP 500 | SF | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 6-7(4) 7-5 6-2 | Radek Stepanek | Match data |
| Sep 8, 2009* | US Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 6-1 6-3 6-3 | Radek Stepanek | Match data |
| May 10, 2008* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | SF | Clay | Novak Djokovic | 6-0 1-0 (ret.) | Radek Stepanek | Match data |
| Aug 30, 2007* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 6-7(4) 7-6(5) 5-7 7-5 7-6(2) | Radek Stepanek | Match data |
| Feb 25, 2006* | Rotterdam | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Radek Stepanek | 7-5 4-6 7-6(2) | Novak Djokovic | Match data |
| Feb 3, 2006* | Zagreb | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Novak Djokovic | 6-3 6-4 | Radek Stepanek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Novak Djokovic | #7 | #1 | 16,950 | 2,593 | 1,122 | 223 | 83.4% | 24 | 40 | 7 | 14 | 15 | 100 |
| Radek Stepanek | #492 | #8 | 2,700 | 2,034 | 366 | 283 | 56.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Novak Djokovic | Radek Stepanek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2004 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #186 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2005 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #78 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2006 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #16 | 1,884 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #165 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2007 | 65–19 | 77.4% | #3 | 2,067 | 0 | 7 | 1999 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #169 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2008 | 58–15 | 79.5% | #3 | 2,120 | 1 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2009 | 78–17 | 82.1% | #3 | 2,267 | 1 | 16 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #542 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2010 | 56–18 | 75.7% | #3 | 2,166 | 1 | 18 | 2002 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #63 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2011 | 72–6 | 92.3% | #1 | 2,357 | 4 | 28 | 2003 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #46 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2012 | 71–10 | 87.7% | #1 | 2,429 | 5 | 34 | 2004 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #33 | 1,790 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2013 | 67–9 | 88.2% | #2 | 2,469 | 6 | 41 | 2005 | 45–26 | 63.4% | #20 | 1,840 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2014 | 65–8 | 89.0% | #1 | 2,463 | 7 | 48 | 2006 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,865 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2015 | 82–6 | 93.2% | #1 | 2,554 | 10 | 59 | 2007 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #30 | 1,863 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2016 | 64–8 | 88.9% | #2 | 2,450 | 12 | 66 | 2008 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #27 | 1,837 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2017 | 31–8 | 79.5% | #12 | 2,293 | 12 | 68 | 2009 | 44–19 | 69.8% | #12 | 2,010 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 2018 | 53–12 | 81.5% | #1 | 2,332 | 14 | 72 | 2010 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #62 | 1,872 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 2019 | 55–11 | 83.3% | #2 | 2,264 | 16 | 77 | 2011 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #28 | 1,880 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | 2020 | 35–5 | 87.5% | #1 | 2,275 | 17 | 81 | 2012 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #31 | 1,930 | 0 | 5 |
| 34 | 2021 | 46–5 | 90.2% | #1 | 2,372 | 20 | 86 | 2013 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #44 | 1,828 | 0 | 5 |
| 35 | 2022 | 42–6 | 87.5% | #5 | 2,368 | 21 | 91 | 2014 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #68 | 1,801 | 0 | 5 |
| 36 | 2023 | 54–6 | 90.0% | #1 | 2,405 | 24 | 98 | 2015 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #197 | 1,766 | 0 | 5 |
| 37 | 2024 | 29–9 | 76.3% | #7 | 2,226 | 24 | 98 | 2016 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #107 | 1,866 | 0 | 5 |
| 38 | 2025 | 39–11 | 78.0% | #4 | 2,174 | 24 | 100 | 2017 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #354 | 1,900 | 0 | 5 |
| 39 | 2026 | 15–5 | 75.0% | #7 | 2,155 | 24 | 100 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |