H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Novak Djokovic vs Richard Gasquet H2H: 13-1
Novak Djokovic holds a 13–1 lead over Richard Gasquet in their ATP head-to-head. Across 14 main-draw meetings, Novak Djokovic leads 9–1 on hard courts and 3–0 on clay. Most recently, Novak Djokovic won the 2018 US Open third round 6-2 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Serbia
Age 39
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
13
–
1
14 main draw meetings
France
Age 40
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 2018* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 6-2 6-3 6-3 | Richard Gasquet | Match data |
| Jul 11, 2015* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | SF | Grass | Novak Djokovic | 7-6(2) 6-4 6-4 | Richard Gasquet | Match data |
| Jun 2, 2015* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R16 | Clay | Novak Djokovic | 6-1 6-2 6-3 | Richard Gasquet | Match data |
| Nov 4, 2013 | Tour Finals | ATP Finals | RR | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 7-6(5) 4-6 6-3 | Richard Gasquet | Match data |
| Oct 5, 2013* | Beijing | ATP 500 | SF | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 6-4 6-2 | Richard Gasquet | Match data |
| Aug 10, 2013* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | QF | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 6-1 6-2 | Richard Gasquet | Match data |
| Aug 12, 2012* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | F | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 6-3 6-2 | Richard Gasquet | Match data |
| Mar 28, 2012* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 7-5 6-3 | Richard Gasquet | Match data |
| May 31, 2011* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R16 | Clay | Novak Djokovic | 6-4 6-4 6-2 | Richard Gasquet | Match data |
| Mar 18, 2011* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | QF | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 6-2 6-4 | Richard Gasquet | Match data |
| Oct 15, 2010* | Shanghai Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 6-1 6-1 | Richard Gasquet | Match data |
| Nov 12, 2007 | Masters Cup | ATP Finals | RR | Hard | Richard Gasquet | 6-4 6-2 | Novak Djokovic | Match data |
| May 5, 2007* | Estoril | ATP 250 | F | Clay | Novak Djokovic | 7-6(7) 0-6 6-1 | Richard Gasquet | Match data |
| Oct 19, 2006* | Madrid Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 7-6(2) 1-6 6-1 | Richard Gasquet | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Novak Djokovic | #7 | #1 | 16,950 | 2,593 | 1,122 | 223 | 83.4% | 24 | 40 | 7 | 14 | 15 | 100 |
| Richard Gasquet | #448 | #7 | 3,365 | 2,165 | 596 | 406 | 59.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 16 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Novak Djokovic | Richard Gasquet | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #161 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2004 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #186 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #93 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2005 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #78 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #107 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2006 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #16 | 1,884 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 30–10 | 75.0% | #16 | 1,851 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2007 | 65–19 | 77.4% | #3 | 2,067 | 0 | 7 | 2006 | 33–20 | 62.3% | #18 | 1,922 | 0 | 4 |
| 21 | 2008 | 58–15 | 79.5% | #3 | 2,120 | 1 | 11 | 2007 | 47–24 | 66.2% | #8 | 1,920 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 2009 | 78–17 | 82.1% | #3 | 2,267 | 1 | 16 | 2008 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #25 | 1,869 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 2010 | 56–18 | 75.7% | #3 | 2,166 | 1 | 18 | 2009 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #52 | 1,855 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 2011 | 72–6 | 92.3% | #1 | 2,357 | 4 | 28 | 2010 | 38–24 | 61.3% | #30 | 1,892 | 0 | 6 |
| 25 | 2012 | 71–10 | 87.7% | #1 | 2,429 | 5 | 34 | 2011 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #19 | 1,984 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 2013 | 67–9 | 88.2% | #2 | 2,469 | 6 | 41 | 2012 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #10 | 2,002 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | 2014 | 65–8 | 89.0% | #1 | 2,463 | 7 | 48 | 2013 | 48–23 | 67.6% | #9 | 2,046 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | 2015 | 82–6 | 93.2% | #1 | 2,554 | 10 | 59 | 2014 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #26 | 1,935 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | 2016 | 64–8 | 88.9% | #2 | 2,450 | 12 | 66 | 2015 | 43–17 | 71.7% | #9 | 2,127 | 0 | 12 |
| 30 | 2017 | 31–8 | 79.5% | #12 | 2,293 | 12 | 68 | 2016 | 33–17 | 66.0% | #18 | 1,998 | 0 | 14 |
| 31 | 2018 | 53–12 | 81.5% | #1 | 2,332 | 14 | 72 | 2017 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #31 | 1,956 | 0 | 14 |
| 32 | 2019 | 55–11 | 83.3% | #2 | 2,264 | 16 | 77 | 2018 | 34–23 | 59.6% | #26 | 1,933 | 0 | 15 |
| 33 | 2020 | 35–5 | 87.5% | #1 | 2,275 | 17 | 81 | 2019 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #61 | 1,844 | 0 | 15 |
| 34 | 2021 | 46–5 | 90.2% | #1 | 2,372 | 20 | 86 | 2020 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #47 | 1,823 | 0 | 15 |
| 35 | 2022 | 42–6 | 87.5% | #5 | 2,368 | 21 | 91 | 2021 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #87 | 1,772 | 0 | 15 |
| 36 | 2023 | 54–6 | 90.0% | #1 | 2,405 | 24 | 98 | 2022 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #68 | 1,860 | 0 | 15 |
| 37 | 2024 | 29–9 | 76.3% | #7 | 2,226 | 24 | 98 | 2023 | 15–25 | 37.5% | #76 | 1,628 | 0 | 16 |
| 38 | 2025 | 39–11 | 78.0% | #4 | 2,174 | 24 | 100 | 2024 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #129 | 1,620 | 0 | 16 |
| 39 | 2026 | 15–5 | 75.0% | #7 | 2,155 | 24 | 100 | 2025 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #313 | 1,636 | 0 | 16 |