H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Novak Djokovic vs Robby Ginepri H2H: 4-0

Novak Djokovic holds a 4–0 lead over Robby Ginepri in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Novak Djokovic leads 2–0 on clay and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Novak Djokovic won the 2010 Roland Garros fourth round 6-4 2-6 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Novak Djokovic
Serbia Age 39 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
4 – 0
4 main draw meetings
Robby Ginepri
USA Age 43 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 1, 2010* Roland Garros Grand Slam R16 Clay Novak Djokovic #3 6-4 2-6 6-1 6-2 Robby Ginepri #98 Match data
Oct 10, 2007* Vienna ATP 500 R32 Hard Novak Djokovic #3 6-3 6-4 Robby Ginepri #70 Match data
Mar 8, 2007* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Novak Djokovic #13 6-4 6-4 Robby Ginepri #43 Match data
May 25, 2005* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Novak Djokovic #153 6-0 6-0 6-3 Robby Ginepri #71 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Novak Djokovic #7 #1 16,950 2,593 1,122 223 83.4% 24 40 7 14 15 100
Robby Ginepri #1,221 #15 1,525 1,927 185 194 48.8% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Novak Djokovic Robby Ginepri
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2004 1–3 25.0% #186 1,490 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2005 9–9 50.0% #78 1,732 0 0 2001 3–5 37.5% #175 1,521 0 0
19 2006 35–17 67.3% #16 1,884 0 2 2002 6–12 33.3% #100 1,580 0 0
20 2007 65–19 77.4% #3 2,067 0 7 2003 31–19 62.0% #32 1,789 0 1
21 2008 58–15 79.5% #3 2,120 1 11 2004 19–24 44.2% #63 1,697 0 1
22 2009 78–17 82.1% #3 2,267 1 16 2005 37–23 61.7% #15 1,882 0 2
23 2010 56–18 75.7% #3 2,166 1 18 2006 23–24 48.9% #51 1,804 0 2
24 2011 72–6 92.3% #1 2,357 4 28 2007 11–20 35.5% #134 1,716 0 2
25 2012 71–10 87.7% #1 2,429 5 34 2008 25–19 56.8% #51 1,814 0 2
26 2013 67–9 88.2% #2 2,469 6 41 2009 13–18 41.9% #100 1,689 0 3
27 2014 65–8 89.0% #1 2,463 7 48 2010 8–12 40.0% #144 1,669 0 3
28 2015 82–6 93.2% #1 2,554 10 59 2011 2–4 33.3% #311 1,665 0 3
29 2016 64–8 88.9% #2 2,450 12 66 2012 2–4 33.3% #287 1,598 0 3
30 2017 31–8 79.5% #12 2,293 12 68 2013 2–2 50.0% #214 1,639 0 3
31 2018 53–12 81.5% #1 2,332 14 72 2014 3–8 27.3% #223 1,700 0 3
32 2019 55–11 83.3% #2 2,264 16 77 — — — — — — —
33 2020 35–5 87.5% #1 2,275 17 81 — — — — — — —
34 2021 46–5 90.2% #1 2,372 20 86 — — — — — — —
35 2022 42–6 87.5% #5 2,368 21 91 — — — — — — —
36 2023 54–6 90.0% #1 2,405 24 98 — — — — — — —
37 2024 29–9 76.3% #7 2,226 24 98 — — — — — — —
38 2025 39–11 78.0% #4 2,174 24 100 — — — — — — —
39 2026 15–5 75.0% #7 2,155 24 100 — — — — — — —