H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Novak Djokovic vs Robin Soderling H2H: 6-1

Novak Djokovic holds a 6–1 lead over Robin Soderling in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Novak Djokovic leads 4–1 on hard courts and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Novak Djokovic won the 2011 Rome Masters quarterfinal 6-3 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Novak Djokovic
Serbia Age 39 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
6 – 1
7 main draw meetings
Robin Soderling
SWE Age 41 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 14, 2011* Rome Masters Masters 1000 QF Clay Novak Djokovic #2 6-3 6-0 Robin Soderling #5 Match data
Nov 22, 2009 Tour Finals ATP Finals RR Hard Robin Soderling #9 7-6(5) 6-1 Novak Djokovic #3 Match data
Nov 14, 2009* Paris Masters Masters 1000 QF Hard Novak Djokovic #3 6-4 1-6 6-3 Robin Soderling #10 Match data
Oct 10, 2009* Beijing ATP 500 SF Hard Novak Djokovic #4 6-3 6-3 Robin Soderling #11 Match data
Sep 27, 2008* Bangkok ATP 250 QF Hard Novak Djokovic #3 6-4 7-5 Robin Soderling #34 Match data
Jul 25, 2008* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Novak Djokovic #3 6-4 6-4 Robin Soderling #49 Match data
May 10, 2007* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Novak Djokovic #5 3-6 6-4 6-3 Robin Soderling #27 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Novak Djokovic #7 #1 16,950 2,593 1,122 223 83.4% 24 40 7 14 15 100
Robin Soderling #195 #4 6,055 2,172 285 166 63.2% 0 1 0 2 7 10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Novak Djokovic Robin Soderling
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 2001 1–1 50.0% #444 1,518 0 0
17 2004 1–3 25.0% #186 1,490 0 0 2002 1–5 16.7% #163 1,554 0 0
18 2005 9–9 50.0% #78 1,732 0 0 2003 10–6 62.5% #60 1,728 0 0
19 2006 35–17 67.3% #16 1,884 0 2 2004 31–26 54.4% #34 1,824 0 1
20 2007 65–19 77.4% #3 2,067 0 7 2005 16–18 47.1% #77 1,737 0 2
21 2008 58–15 79.5% #3 2,120 1 11 2006 33–22 60.0% #25 1,823 0 2
22 2009 78–17 82.1% #3 2,267 1 16 2007 22–15 59.5% #41 1,831 0 2
23 2010 56–18 75.7% #3 2,166 1 18 2008 40–19 67.8% #17 1,959 0 3
24 2011 72–6 92.3% #1 2,357 4 28 2009 44–23 65.7% #8 2,070 0 4
25 2012 71–10 87.7% #1 2,429 5 34 2010 53–22 70.7% #5 2,118 0 6
26 2013 67–9 88.2% #2 2,469 6 41 2011 34–9 79.1% #13 2,127 0 10
27 2014 65–8 89.0% #1 2,463 7 48 — — — — — — —
28 2015 82–6 93.2% #1 2,554 10 59 — — — — — — —
29 2016 64–8 88.9% #2 2,450 12 66 — — — — — — —
30 2017 31–8 79.5% #12 2,293 12 68 — — — — — — —
31 2018 53–12 81.5% #1 2,332 14 72 — — — — — — —
32 2019 55–11 83.3% #2 2,264 16 77 — — — — — — —
33 2020 35–5 87.5% #1 2,275 17 81 — — — — — — —
34 2021 46–5 90.2% #1 2,372 20 86 — — — — — — —
35 2022 42–6 87.5% #5 2,368 21 91 — — — — — — —
36 2023 54–6 90.0% #1 2,405 24 98 — — — — — — —
37 2024 29–9 76.3% #7 2,226 24 98 — — — — — — —
38 2025 39–11 78.0% #4 2,174 24 100 — — — — — — —
39 2026 15–5 75.0% #7 2,155 24 100 — — — — — — —