H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Novak Djokovic vs Sergiy Stakhovsky H2H: 4-0
Novak Djokovic holds a 4–0 lead over Sergiy Stakhovsky in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Novak Djokovic leads 3–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Novak Djokovic won the 2015 Doha fourth round 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Serbia
Age 39
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
4
–
0
4 main draw meetings
UKR
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 8, 2015* | Doha | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 6-2 6-1 | Sergiy Stakhovsky | Match data |
| Mar 1, 2012* | Dubai | ATP 500 | R16 | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 7-6(5) 6-3 | Sergiy Stakhovsky | Match data |
| Feb 11, 2010* | Rotterdam | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 6-2 4-1 (ret.) | Sergiy Stakhovsky | Match data |
| May 28, 2009* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Novak Djokovic | 6-3 6-4 6-1 | Sergiy Stakhovsky | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Novak Djokovic | #7 | #1 | 16,950 | 2,593 | 1,122 | 223 | 83.4% | 24 | 40 | 7 | 14 | 15 | 100 |
| Sergiy Stakhovsky | #678 | #31 | 1,263 | 1,839 | 145 | 195 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Novak Djokovic | Sergiy Stakhovsky | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2004 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #186 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #335 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #78 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #184 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #16 | 1,884 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #195 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 65–19 | 77.4% | #3 | 2,067 | 0 | 7 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #199 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 58–15 | 79.5% | #3 | 2,120 | 1 | 11 | 2008 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #92 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 |
| 2009 | 78–17 | 82.1% | #3 | 2,267 | 1 | 16 | 2009 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #60 | 1,750 | 0 | 2 |
| 2010 | 56–18 | 75.7% | #3 | 2,166 | 1 | 18 | 2010 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,743 | 0 | 4 |
| 2011 | 72–6 | 92.3% | #1 | 2,357 | 4 | 28 | 2011 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #62 | 1,707 | 0 | 4 |
| 2012 | 71–10 | 87.7% | #1 | 2,429 | 5 | 34 | 2012 | 13–26 | 33.3% | #103 | 1,739 | 0 | 4 |
| 2013 | 67–9 | 88.2% | #2 | 2,469 | 6 | 41 | 2013 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #98 | 1,679 | 0 | 4 |
| 2014 | 65–8 | 89.0% | #1 | 2,463 | 7 | 48 | 2014 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #58 | 1,686 | 0 | 4 |
| 2015 | 82–6 | 93.2% | #1 | 2,554 | 10 | 59 | 2015 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #62 | 1,715 | 0 | 4 |
| 2016 | 64–8 | 88.9% | #2 | 2,450 | 12 | 66 | 2016 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #109 | 1,693 | 0 | 4 |
| 2017 | 31–8 | 79.5% | #12 | 2,293 | 12 | 68 | 2017 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #122 | 1,728 | 0 | 4 |
| 2018 | 53–12 | 81.5% | #1 | 2,332 | 14 | 72 | 2018 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #134 | 1,649 | 0 | 4 |
| 2019 | 55–11 | 83.3% | #2 | 2,264 | 16 | 77 | 2019 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #150 | 1,576 | 0 | 4 |
| 2020 | 35–5 | 87.5% | #1 | 2,275 | 17 | 81 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,568 | 0 | 4 |
| 2021 | 46–5 | 90.2% | #1 | 2,372 | 20 | 86 | 2021 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #220 | 1,530 | 0 | 4 |
| 2022 | 42–6 | 87.5% | #5 | 2,368 | 21 | 91 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 54–6 | 90.0% | #1 | 2,405 | 24 | 98 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 29–9 | 76.3% | #7 | 2,226 | 24 | 98 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 39–11 | 78.0% | #4 | 2,174 | 24 | 100 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 15–5 | 75.0% | #7 | 2,155 | 24 | 100 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |