H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Novak Djokovic vs Simone Bolelli H2H: 4-0

Novak Djokovic holds a 4–0 lead over Simone Bolelli in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Novak Djokovic leads 3–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Novak Djokovic won the 2015 China Open first round 6-1 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Novak Djokovic
Serbia Age 39 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
4 – 0
4 main draw meetings
Simone Bolelli
ITA Age 40 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Novak Djokovic #1 6-1 6-1 Simone Bolelli #59 Match data Oct 8, 2015* R32 China Open ATP 500 Hard
Novak Djokovic #4 7-5 6-2 Simone Bolelli #66 Match data Jun 11, 2009* R32 Halle Open ATP 250 Grass
Novak Djokovic #3 7-6(2) 7-6(2) Simone Bolelli #50 Match data Jul 31, 2008* R32 Cincinnati Open Masters 1000 Hard
Novak Djokovic #3 6-1 6-2 6-2 Simone Bolelli #70 Match data Jan 17, 2008* R64 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS Olympics 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Novak Djokovic #5 #1 16,950 2,593 1,141 231 83.2% 24 1 40 7 15 14 101
Simone Bolelli #1,391 #36 1,686 1,931 113 157 41.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Novak Djokovic Simone Bolelli
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2004 1–3 25.0% #186 1,490 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2005 9–9 50.0% #78 1,733 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2006 35–17 67.3% #16 1,884 0 2 — — — — — — —
20 2007 65–19 77.4% #3 2,068 0 7 2006 0–4 0.0% #127 1,465 0 0
21 2008 63–16 79.7% #3 2,130 1 11 2007 8–14 36.4% #67 1,601 0 0
22 2009 78–17 82.1% #3 2,273 1 16 2008 26–28 48.1% #41 1,775 0 0
23 2010 56–18 75.7% #3 2,163 1 18 2009 14–22 38.9% #93 1,698 0 0
24 2011 72–6 92.3% #1 2,382 4 28 2010 5–11 31.2% #107 1,672 0 0
25 2012 75–12 86.2% #1 2,425 5 34 2011 4–8 33.3% #134 1,679 0 0
26 2013 67–9 88.2% #2 2,471 6 41 2012 6–10 37.5% #84 1,713 0 0
27 2014 65–8 89.0% #1 2,450 7 48 2013 6–8 42.9% #245 1,693 0 0
28 2015 82–6 93.2% #1 2,554 10 59 2014 6–8 42.9% #55 1,744 0 0
29 2016 64–9 87.7% #2 2,429 12 66 2015 28–25 52.8% #58 1,874 0 0
30 2017 31–8 79.5% #12 2,281 12 68 2016 2–8 20.0% #464 1,791 0 0
31 2018 53–12 81.5% #1 2,332 14 72 2017 2–4 33.3% #171 1,801 0 0
32 2019 55–11 83.3% #2 2,262 16 77 2018 5–4 55.6% #141 1,788 0 0
33 2020 35–5 87.5% #1 2,277 17 81 2019 1–3 25.0% #334 1,736 0 0
34 2021 50–7 87.7% #1 2,339 20 86 — — — — — — —
35 2022 42–6 87.5% #5 2,353 21 91 — — — — — — —
36 2023 54–6 90.0% #1 2,402 24 98 — — — — — — —
37 2024 35–9 79.5% #7 2,273 24 99 — — — — — — —
38 2025 39–11 78.0% #4 2,191 24 101 — — — — — — —
39 2026 15–7 68.2% #5 2,094 24 101 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Novak Djokovic Simone Bolelli
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2004 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2005 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2006 14 8 22 63.6% 14 5 19 73.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2007 43 12 55 78.2% 16 5 21 76.2% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2006 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2008 42 11 53 79.2% 16 3 19 84.2% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2007 3 6 9 33.3% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 2009 53 11 64 82.8% 17 4 21 81.0% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — — 2008 12 18 30 40.0% 11 7 18 61.1% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
23 2010 40 12 52 76.9% 10 4 14 71.4% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2009 6 13 19 31.6% 7 7 14 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
24 2011 46 5 51 90.2% 19 1 20 95.0% 7 0 7 100.0% — — — — 2010 0 5 5 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — — — — —
25 2012 50 5 55 90.9% 16 4 20 80.0% 9 3 12 75.0% — — — — 2011 1 2 3 33.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
26 2013 49 5 54 90.7% 12 3 15 80.0% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — — 2012 1 3 4 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
27 2014 44 6 50 88.0% 14 2 16 87.5% 7 0 7 100.0% — — — — 2013 3 3 6 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 2015 59 5 64 92.2% 16 1 17 94.1% 7 0 7 100.0% — — — — 2014 2 4 6 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
29 2016 46 6 52 88.5% 16 2 18 88.9% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2015 16 15 31 51.6% 9 7 16 56.3% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
30 2017 10 3 13 76.9% 13 4 17 76.5% 8 1 9 88.9% — — — — 2016 1 6 7 14.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
31 2018 31 6 37 83.8% 11 5 16 68.8% 11 1 12 91.7% — — — — 2017 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
32 2019 32 8 40 80.0% 16 3 19 84.2% 7 0 7 100.0% — — — — 2018 — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
33 2020 24 4 28 85.7% 11 1 12 91.7% — — — — — — — — 2019 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
34 2021 25 4 29 86.2% 18 3 21 85.7% 7 0 7 100.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2022 20 2 22 90.9% 15 4 19 78.9% 7 0 7 100.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2023 36 2 38 94.7% 12 3 15 80.0% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2024 13 4 17 76.5% 16 4 20 80.0% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2025 25 7 32 78.1% 9 3 12 75.0% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2026 8 4 12 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 712 134 846 84.2% 292 71 363 80.4% 131 22 153 85.6% 6 4 10 60.0% — 46 80 126 36.5% 50 59 109 45.9% 16 16 32 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 1,324/1,372 of Novak Djokovic's and 266/270 of Simone Bolelli's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Novak Djokovic Simone Bolelli
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2004 4/4 6.5 5.3 62.5% 59.7% 42.5% 44.3% 38.4% 53.1% 41.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2005 18/18 4.9 3.2 63.1% 69.1% 48.2% 60.2% 44.6% 61.2% 37.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2006 52/52 5.5 3.0 63.0% 72.3% 53.1% 59.7% 49.3% 65.1% 40.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2007 83/84 6.2 2.3 64.2% 73.1% 54.5% 64.7% 44.4% 66.4% 41.0% 2006 4/4 4.0 0.8 61.9% 62.3% 51.2% 60.8% 21.9% 58.5% 33.3%
21 2008 73/79 6.3 2.0 64.7% 74.2% 58.0% 67.4% 50.9% 68.6% 42.6% 2007 22/22 4.5 1.1 65.5% 68.7% 52.3% 48.4% 46.5% 63.0% 29.8%
22 2009 95/95 5.3 2.8 63.1% 73.3% 54.3% 63.6% 43.6% 66.3% 42.5% 2008 53/54 5.0 1.4 66.9% 70.0% 54.6% 67.0% 39.3% 64.9% 33.3%
23 2010 72/74 4.2 3.9 64.0% 71.6% 54.0% 65.8% 48.0% 65.2% 42.4% 2009 35/36 4.7 1.4 62.8% 69.0% 52.1% 63.8% 34.1% 62.8% 33.4%
24 2011 75/78 4.6 1.9 65.5% 74.8% 57.2% 63.6% 51.1% 68.6% 46.2% 2010 16/16 3.4 1.5 67.1% 66.4% 44.3% 48.6% 45.6% 59.2% 34.1%
25 2012 81/87 5.6 1.8 64.5% 75.7% 56.9% 65.1% 50.8% 69.1% 44.0% 2011 12/12 3.1 0.4 69.6% 62.8% 52.8% 55.1% 51.6% 59.7% 32.4%
26 2013 76/76 6.3 1.6 65.8% 76.3% 62.2% 64.6% 45.0% 71.3% 44.6% 2012 16/16 2.9 2.0 64.9% 69.4% 46.3% 52.2% 50.5% 61.5% 33.7%
27 2014 69/73 6.2 1.5 67.0% 75.5% 57.5% 60.3% 47.7% 69.6% 44.3% 2013 14/14 3.6 1.7 63.1% 66.1% 51.9% 38.0% 43.4% 61.0% 33.4%
28 2015 87/88 5.4 1.6 66.7% 75.4% 61.4% 62.8% 48.1% 70.7% 44.3% 2014 14/14 5.7 2.6 64.7% 70.3% 59.7% 44.0% 31.9% 66.1% 33.2%
29 2016 71/73 3.8 2.4 64.8% 75.0% 57.4% 62.1% 49.2% 68.6% 44.5% 2015 52/53 4.2 1.6 66.7% 72.3% 56.2% 63.8% 47.2% 66.8% 35.1%
30 2017 38/39 4.1 1.9 66.8% 73.4% 53.8% 61.4% 47.9% 66.8% 41.1% 2016 9/10 5.9 1.7 65.1% 66.8% 49.0% 60.6% 44.0% 60.3% 28.9%
31 2018 65/65 5.3 2.3 66.4% 75.5% 58.1% 64.1% 45.1% 69.7% 42.5% 2017 6/6 2.5 1.0 73.1% 61.7% 58.7% 62.5% 45.4% 60.9% 33.2%
32 2019 65/66 5.7 2.6 66.1% 77.4% 59.4% 63.1% 53.6% 71.3% 42.4% 2018 9/9 2.0 1.1 76.5% 65.6% 52.5% 65.5% 35.4% 62.1% 37.9%
33 2020 40/40 6.1 2.8 64.1% 75.9% 53.8% 64.3% 43.4% 67.9% 44.1% 2019 4/4 1.8 1.0 68.3% 62.6% 53.1% 50.6% 66.7% 59.4% 28.4%
34 2021 50/57 8.3 2.7 64.8% 76.7% 54.6% 59.4% 48.3% 68.9% 44.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2022 47/48 6.0 1.9 65.8% 78.5% 58.2% 59.4% 46.9% 71.7% 41.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2023 60/60 7.2 2.9 63.5% 78.0% 57.9% 60.8% 45.3% 70.7% 41.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2024 36/44 7.3 2.7 63.8% 76.0% 56.7% 61.5% 43.5% 69.1% 41.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2025 46/50 8.2 2.1 67.2% 76.8% 55.8% 53.0% 47.1% 69.9% 39.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
39 2026 21/22 8.8 3.5 68.2% 74.6% 54.0% 64.4% 39.0% 67.8% 36.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1,324/1,372 5.8 2.3 65.1% 75.0% 56.7% 62.7% 47.4% 68.6% 42.8% — 266/270 4.2 1.5 66.3% 68.8% 53.1% 58.4% 42.5% 63.4% 33.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Novak Djokovic Simone Bolelli
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2004 1491 107.5 -0.98 -0.85 0.885 47.7% — +57 — 36.4% -0.91 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2005 1733 128.8 -0.13 +0.84 0.974 49.7% -92 -124 -27 51.0% -0.14 2–2 (50%) 8–2 (80%) — -0.77 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2006 1885 144.3 +2.58 +1.86 1.145 52.6% -115 -18 -101 63.6% +0.85 10–6 (63%) 14–5 (74%) — +0.06 2005 1496 97.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2007 2069 168.7 +4.20 +4.63 1.219 53.6% -9 -83 -156 70.3% +1.30 18–6 (75%) 28–13 (68%) — -0.04 2006 1465 108.7 -0.66 -0.84 0.803 46.1% — — — 20.0% -1.60 0–2 1–3 (25%) — -0.29
21 2008 2130 172.3 +5.71 +7.08 1.355 55.3% +34 +15 -166 75.3% +1.68 8–6 (57%) 18–12 (60%) — -1.51 2007 1602 127.2 +0.03 -4.56 0.806 47.1% -42 -20 — 34.6% -0.88 1–1 4–6 (40%) — -1.31
22 2009 2274 175.6 +3.72 +6.70 1.260 54.2% +35 -48 -230 74.9% +1.62 18–4 (82%) 19–15 (56%) — +2.04 2008 1775 145.8 +2.16 -1.96 0.948 49.3% -80 -27 -102 49.6% -0.16 3–9 (25%) 17–16 (52%) — -1.86
23 2010 2163 172.7 +2.60 +6.48 1.220 53.7% +62 0 -55 71.1% +1.38 9–7 (56%) 11–8 (58%) — +0.94 2009 1699 138.5 +0.14 -1.79 0.899 48.4% -66 +76 — 42.2% -0.63 5–6 (45%) 8–10 (44%) — -2.05
24 2011 2383 182.8 +6.53 +9.98 1.473 57.2% +13 -31 -72 82.9% +2.35 14–2 (88%) 8–7 (53%) — -1.11 2010 1673 123.9 -1.48 -2.28 0.836 46.4% -130 +148 — 33.3% -1.12 0–3 (0%) 6–5 (55%) — -0.61
25 2012 2426 182.4 +6.77 +8.20 1.427 56.2% +70 -20 -80 77.8% +2.07 16–3 (84%) 17–12 (59%) — -2.53 2011 1679 123.8 -1.26 -2.49 0.805 46.3% -108 +81 +96 36.7% -0.93 — 4–4 (50%) — -0.44
26 2013 2471 184.6 +8.33 +8.48 1.555 57.0% +86 -60 -72 79.4% +2.09 15–6 (71%) 19–9 (68%) — -1.97 2012 1713 127.3 -0.23 -1.02 0.877 47.7% -107 +38 +114 37.8% -1.03 1–1 5–2 (71%) — -0.65
27 2014 2451 184.1 +6.63 +9.04 1.457 56.5% +45 +29 +72 78.4% +2.05 15–2 (88%) 13–10 (57%) — -1.15 2013 1693 126.1 -1.20 -2.42 0.855 46.8% -60 +25 — 43.3% -0.77 3–1 (75%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.13
28 2015 2554 186.4 +7.05 +9.59 1.509 56.9% +60 +29 +50 83.8% +2.33 16–2 (89%) 17–9 (65%) — +0.06 2014 1744 131.5 +2.15 -1.19 0.981 49.0% -78 +17 +83 45.7% -0.52 3–3 (50%) 4–2 (67%) — +0.20
29 2016 2430 183.4 +5.55 +8.54 1.418 56.0% +83 +151 +115 81.8% +2.05 8–1 (89%) 19–7 (73%) — -0.65 2015 1874 157.5 +2.49 -0.19 1.057 50.9% -60 0 -28 53.5% +0.16 8–8 (50%) 13–13 (50%) — -3.63
30 2017 2281 169.1 +3.30 +4.52 1.236 53.9% +127 +161 +137 73.4% +1.50 8–2 (80%) 10–5 (67%) — -0.74 2016 1792 125.5 -1.80 -4.48 0.729 46.0% -65 — — 29.2% -1.54 0–1 4–2 (67%) — -0.64
31 2018 2333 175.5 +5.76 +7.04 1.406 55.3% +44 +2 +149 76.3% +1.72 8–6 (57%) 15–9 (63%) — -1.21 2017 1802 128.3 -0.83 -0.46 0.850 48.0% — — — 38.9% -0.72 0–1 0–2 — -0.45
32 2019 2263 174.5 +6.82 +6.86 1.476 56.3% 0 +80 +290 80.5% +2.00 7–8 (47%) 15–5 (75%) — -0.39 2018 1788 126.3 +1.16 +0.59 1.003 50.3% — +93 — 50.0% -0.04 2–1 (67%) 3–1 (75%) — -0.61
33 2020 2277 174.3 +4.76 +6.66 1.375 55.6% -19 +74 — 81.3% +1.93 6–1 (86%) 11–2 (85%) — -1.17 2019 1737 109.6 -1.97 -2.79 0.700 44.5% -17 — — 22.2% -1.55 — 0–1 — +0.08
34 2021 2339 175.3 +5.82 +8.26 1.443 56.3% +2 +113 +292 77.0% +1.99 9–5 (64%) 12–9 (57%) — -2.44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2022 2354 170.3 +7.26 +6.21 1.481 56.1% +24 +57 +322 80.0% +1.83 6–4 (60%) 18–4 (82%) — -0.84 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2023 2402 174.8 +7.28 +6.22 1.422 55.5% +78 +9 +271 82.1% +1.97 11–4 (73%) 31–8 (79%) — -1.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2024 2273 164.2 +4.66 +5.21 1.354 54.9% +76 +122 +363 74.1% +1.59 4–3 (57%) 13–5 (72%) — -0.71 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2025 2192 161.5 +5.25 +3.10 1.297 54.3% +52 +120 +371 72.3% +1.53 5–1 (83%) 11–13 (46%) — -1.44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2026 2095 144.5 +2.71 +1.71 1.124 51.9% +65 +133 +377 61.0% +0.65 4–5 (44%) 5–4 (56%) — -1.84 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2594 180.7 +5.47 +6.81 1.362 55.3% +38 +32 +76 76.2% +1.76 218–88 (71%) 332–174 (66%) 107.4 -1.42 — 1932 141.2 +0.75 -1.74 0.911 48.5% -70 +37 +10 43.7% -0.51 26–37 (41%) 71–68 (51%) 98.2 -4.54

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.